In a bold diplomatic rebuff, Iran has cast doubt on Pakistan’s suitability as a neutral arbiter in ceasefire discussions aimed at defusing Iran-US hostilities. Pakistan’s self-appointed role in these talks comes amid its push for international rehabilitation and potential financial aid from Western powers.
The criticism peaked with statements from Iranian parliamentarian Ibrahim Rezaei, who used X to declare Pakistan unfit for mediation. Despite neighborly ties, Rezaei argued, ‘They always side with Trump’s benefits and won’t utter a word against the Americans.’ He cited Pakistan’s silence on US flip-flops, including unfulfilled promises related to Lebanon and frozen Iranian assets.
‘A mediator should remain impartial, never tilting toward one party,’ Rezaei asserted, highlighting the need for even-handed brokerage.
Fresh evidence of alleged bias surfaced in an edited X post by PM Shehbaz Sharif following the two-week ceasefire declaration. Archival edits revealed language that mirrored US rhetoric, sparking rumors of scripted American influence.
These developments threaten to derail the nascent peace process. Pakistan’s motivations—blending image-building with economic gains—now face intense scrutiny. Iran’s stance signals a potential shift, as Tehran weighs options for more credible intermediaries. Observers warn that without trust, the path to de-escalation remains fraught with obstacles.
