In a dramatic turn in the Rs 200 crore money laundering scandal, the Enforcement Directorate has strongly contested Bollywood star Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea to become an approver. Patiala House Court in Delhi postponed the hearing to May 8 after ED requested extra time to prepare its counter.
ED’s counsel argued before the judge that Fernandez’s application lacks merit and substance. The agency, probing the fraud orchestrated by jailed con artist Sukesh Chandrashekhar, has been relentless in linking the actress to ill-gotten gains.
Chandrashekhar, accused of swindling 200 crore from Ranbaxy promoters’ kin, allegedly splurged on extravagant presents for Fernandez, including pricey handbags, jewels, and timepieces. These revelations positioned her as a key figure in the ED’s investigation.
Fernandez counters that she was duped, unaware of Chandrashekhar’s shady dealings. Her latest move to turn state’s witness signals a bid for leniency, promising full cooperation. But ED dismissed it outright, prompting the court’s extension.
The probe kicked off with Delhi Police in 2021 before ED’s involvement deepened the money trail. This postponement keeps the suspense alive, with implications for how celebrities navigate legal entanglements in fraud cases.
As Bollywood watches closely, the May 8 hearing could redefine Fernandez’s role—from accused to potential ally in cracking this web of deceit. The saga highlights the blurred lines between fame, fortune, and felony.
