In a developing legal battle with profound political undertones, Rahul Gandhi is set to argue his case before the Allahabad High Court on Monday, April 20. The summons stem from a petition by BJP supporter Vignesh Shishir, alleging the Congress stalwart maintains dual Indian-British citizenship, rendering him ineligible for parliamentary roles.
The single-judge bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi has scheduled the crucial session following a series of interim orders. Initially, the court directed UP Police to investigate the complaint and contemplate an FIR. But recognizing procedural gaps, it later mandated notice to Gandhi, ensuring he can counter the claims before any adverse action.
This reversal draws from established precedents like Jagannath Verma vs. UP Government, which holds that FIR refusal orders aren’t conclusive and require accused participation. During hearings, all parties acknowledged Section 528 BNSS norms, yet a key judgment prompted the court to prioritize due process.
The petitioner’s evidence includes alleged UK records and documents purportedly proving Gandhi’s foreign allegiance. He seeks stringent measures under multiple statutes, including the new criminal code and passport regulations. The saga began in Raebareli’s MP/MLA court, which denied FIR registration in late January, prompting the High Court transfer.
Reminiscent of 2019 Supreme Court rebuff under CJI Gogoi, these allegations refuse to fade. As Leader of Opposition, Gandhi’s defense could either quash the controversy or fuel further debates on loyalty and eligibility. Legal experts watch closely, noting how this unfolds amid heightened political rivalries ahead of key electoral battles.
