In a closely watched legal battle, the Supreme Court wrapped up arguments on Delhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma’s petition today, keeping its decision under wraps. This high-stakes matter revolves around contested administrative directives impacting judicial postings.
Justice Varma filed the plea asserting that specific orders violate principles of judicial autonomy. The courtroom exchanges were intense, with lawyers on both sides presenting compelling cases. The bench probed deeply into the nuances of collegium functions and executive roles in high court judge transfers.
Proponents of the petition highlighted historical judgments that protect judicial self-governance. They warned against precedents that could erode the collegium system’s integrity. Government counsel countered by pointing to practical challenges in managing judicial manpower nationwide.
Throughout the hearing, the judges displayed sharp analytical skills, referencing key articles of the Constitution and past rulings. The session underscored persistent friction points in India’s judicial ecosystem, where autonomy clashes with administrative needs.
