The narrative of collapse surrounding the US-Iran talks in Islamabad doesn’t hold water, according to foreign policy commentator Wael Awwad. In an IANS interview, the senior journalist reframed the outcome of Pakistan-brokered discussions during a brief ceasefire as productive groundwork rather than a dead end.
US Vice President JD Vance had publicly stated no deal emerged from the high-stakes meeting. Yet Awwad counters: ‘Post-1949, this marks unprecedented direct engagement at the vice-presidential level.’ He highlights mutual agreements amid differing agendas—Iran’s 10 proposals against America’s 15.
The US sought a triumphant posture, Awwad observed, but Iran pushed back, demanding balanced negotiations. Key hurdles include nuclear advancements Iran has moderated, post-conflict dynamics in the Strait of Hormuz, and Iran’s push for enduring peace over interim halts.
Pakistan’s mediator role is limited, Awwad stressed; true resolution demands US flexibility, especially since Iran has retreated on nuclear issues. He drew parallels to Geneva’s third-round indirect nuclear talks, where US special envoy Steve Witkoff downplayed advancements verified by Omani and British security chiefs, leading to escalated conflict.
Awwad’s insights reveal a diplomacy teetering on mistrust. With Iran wary of deception after multiple setbacks, the ball is in Washington’s court to foster genuine accord and avert renewed hostilities.
