As Iran’s streets burn with anti-government fury, President Donald Trump faces a pivotal moment. US officials have presented him with detailed military plans targeting Iran, amid reports he may authorize strikes to punish Tehran’s response to mass demonstrations.

The unrest, sparked by crippling inflation since late December, has seen citizens decry skyrocketing costs for basics amid a collapsing currency. Protests have morphed into broader calls against the Khamenei regime, prompting a brutal crackdown—including a nationwide internet blackout lasting over 60 hours.

Citing US sources, the New York Times reports Trump was briefed on options like hitting non-military sites in the capital. This follows his vocal support for the protesters, including a Truth Social message offering American assistance in their quest for liberty.

Tehran fires back, blaming the US and Israel for instigating the disorder. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi lambasted Washington on X for sowing chaos. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf upped the ante, vowing retaliation against US troops, shipping hubs, and occupied lands if America intervenes militarily.

Trump’s history of tough talk on Iran— from withdrawing from the nuclear deal to past threats—suggests he’s no stranger to escalation. Yet, with domestic pressures like inflation at home, any strike carries risks of broader war, oil price spikes, and regional instability.

Analysts debate Trump’s calculus: leverage the protests to weaken Iran, or avoid entanglement? The White House remains silent on decisions, but the briefing signals serious intent. Iran’s economic despair, fueled by unemployment and sanctions, underscores why these uprisings could reshape Middle East power dynamics for years.