Ghalibaf: US Couldn't Earn Iran's Trust in Key Ceasefire Talks

The Islamabad Talks wrapped up without agreement, prompting Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf to accuse the US of failing miserably in gaining Iran's confidence. In a series of posts on X, Ghalibaf dissected the 21-hour marathon sessions, revealing Iran's preconditions rooted in historical conflicts. From the outset, Ghalibaf made it plain: Iran brought sincerity and determination to the table, yet two prior wars eroded any faith in the American side. The Pakistani-hosted dialogue, spanning April 9-10 under their leadership, followed President Trump's ceasefire declaration after 40 days of strife. US Vice President JD Vance headed the American team, facing off against Ghalibaf's Iranian contingent. Sunday's press conference by Vance painted a picture of deadlock. He lamented the lack of progress, deeming it detrimental to Iran, while hinting at lingering possibilities. A 'final offer' was extended as the US delegation departed, shifting the onus to Tehran. Ghalibaf lauded Pakistan's instrumental support in smoothing the talks and paid tribute to his nation's 90 million citizens. He invoked their solidarity under the Supreme Leader, which fortified the Iranian resolve during the grueling exchanges. 'I salute the Iranian people who stood with us,' he wrote. As the dust settles, this impasse underscores persistent divides. Iran's unyielding stance, forged by past betrayals, challenges US diplomacy in the region. Observers now watch if Tehran's rejection of the final proposal escalates matters or paves way for renewed efforts.