Tag: Varanasi

  • PM Modi to Release ₹20,000 Crore for Farmers in Varanasi Today – Full Details |

    PM Modi In Varanasi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi is all set to visit Uttar Pradesh and Bihar on June 18 and 19, Tuesday and Wednesday. According to PMO press release, the Prime Minister will participate in PM Kisan Samman Sammelan in Uttar Pradesh’s Varanasi at around 5 pm. 

    PM Kisan Samman Sammelan 

    During the event, the Prime Minister will grant certificates to more than 30,000 women from self-help groups (SHGs) Krishi Sakhis. PM Modi, after being sworn in as Prime Minister for the third time, signed his first file authorising the release of the 17th installment of PM Kisan Nidhi, reflecting the commitment of the government towards farmer welfare. In continuation of this commitment, the Prime Minister will release the 17th installment amounting to more than Rs 20,000 crore, to around 9.26 crore beneficiary farmers under the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN) through Direct Benefit Transfer today.

    So far, more than 11 crore eligible farmer families have received benefits of more than Rs. 3.04 lakh crore under PM-KISAN. Krishi Sakhi Convergence Program (KSCP) aims to transform rural India through the empowerment of rural women as Krishi Sakhi, by imparting training and certification of Krishi Sakhis as Para-extension Workers. This certification course also aligns with the objectives of the “Lakhpati Didi” Program.

    PM Modi’s Visit To Varanasi 

    At around 7 pm today, PM Modi will witness the Ganga Aarti at Dashashwamedh Ghat, and later, at around 8 pm, he will perform puja and darshan at Kashi Vishwanath temple.

    PM’s Action In Bihar 

    In Bihar, the Prime Minister will visit the Ruins of Nalanda at around 9.45 am. The ruins of Nalanda were declared a UN Heritage Site in 2016. At around 10.30 am, he will inaugurate the new campus of Nalanda University in Rajgir. The Prime Minister will also address the gathering on occasion.

    The university is conceived as a collaboration between India and East Asia Summit (EAS) countries. The inauguration ceremony will be attended by several eminent people, including the heads of missions from 17 countries.
    The campus has two academic blocks with 40 classrooms, with a total seating capacity of around 1900. It has two auditoriums with a capacity of 300 seats each. It has a student hostel with a capacity of around 550 students. It also has various other facilities, including an international center, an amphitheatre that can accommodate up to 2000 individuals, a faculty club, and a sports complex, among others.

    The Campus is a ‘Net Zero’ Green Campus. It is self-sustaining with solar plants, domestic and drinking water treatment plants, a water recycling plant for reusing wastewater, 100 acres of water bodies, and many other environment-friendly facilities.

    The University has a deep connection with history. The original Nalanda University, established around 1600 years ago, is considered to be among the first residential universities in the world. 

  • The man who wanted to challenge Modi but lost the battle even before it began

    For many years, Prime Minister Narendra Modi was not just a leader but a hero for Shyam Rangeela, mirroring the admiration held by millions of Indians. Shyam was so inspired that he began to mimic Modi, even mastering the PM’s iconic “Bhaiyon, Behno” greetings.Over time, however, things changed. Shyam experienced a shift in perspective, particularly after facing what he called restrictions on his work from a group of Modi supporters. This marked the beginning of his transformation from a devoted fan into a critic.Recently, the comedian made headlines with his announcement to contest against Modi from Varanasi as an Independent candidate.“Halfway into the show in which I was mimicking the PM, I was asked to walk out, and mend my ways. That day, I felt that my freedom was clipped. Later, I realised that such intimidation was common. Politicians are not so generous in taking humour and criticism,” a ToI report (by Shailvee Sharda) quoted Rangeela as saying.AllUttar PradeshMaharashtraTamil NaduWest BengalBiharKarnatakaAndhra PradeshTelanganaKeralaMadhya PradeshRajasthanDelhiOther StatesJourneying all the way from Rajasthan’s Sriganganagar to file his nomination, Shyam’s efforts were thwarted by a technical error. The reason for the cancellation of his papers was due to the omission of “not taking oath” during submission, leading to what he calls the “shattering of a dream”. Though disappointing, Rangeela sees the rejection as a form of victory. “The cause of freedom for which I stood up got some attention,” he adds, reflecting on his “chhoti si poll story”.Embracing the rejection, Shyam is relishing the moment, giving interviews, and meeting journalists and influencers from around the globe.Sharing his experience with TOI, the comedian says, “Wo kehte they ki challenge ke bina maza nahi aata hai. Why couldn’t Modi ji keep his words?” he wonders, questioning his rejection.

    Does he regret his political venture? The narrative doesn’t explicitly answer, leaving room for interpretation.

    “Haan, main toh kahin ka nahi raha. BJP wale kehte hain ki maine Modi ji ka mazak banyaya. Congress wale kehte hain main Rahul ki mimicry ki hai. Mujhe dono taraf se kaam nahi milta hai. Chunav mein bahut paisa bhi kharch ho gaya hai to ab naya kaam dhoondh ke hisab theek karna hoga,” Rangeela told the newspaper.

    He claimed to the newspaper that he said no to offers to join opposition candidates and target Narendra Modi from a stronger political platform.

    “I didn’t want to get tagged. In this way, I will prove my trollers right,” Rangeela adds.

    “Jibes such as ‘mazak mazak mein serious ho gaya’ and ‘ghode pe aaya tha nomination bharne’ are very decent compared to allegations like my nomination was rejected because of a pending rape case against me,” he says.

    Rangeela says he will miss the love that people showered on him when he announced to contest poll from Kashi.

  • “We are also saying we should get back PoK but…”: Asaduddin Owaisi attacks BJP

    Amid a debate on Pakistan-Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi asked the BJP on Wednesday what they have done in the last 10 years to get back PoK?

    Owaisi also mentioned that he also wants that PoJK should be included in India but this issue only comes forward during the elections.

    “Now they (BJP) are not saying ‘400 paar’. The real issue is that the prices of petrol have crossed Rs 100 and the incidents of paper leaks are taking place in Varanasi, from where PM Modi is a candidate. They talk about Pok, but what have they done in the last 10 years to get it? We are also saying that PoK is a part of India and we should get it back but the issue of PoK only comes forward during elections,” he said.”All the promises that they made in the last 10 years turned out to be false,” Owaisi added.AllUttar PradeshMaharashtraTamil NaduWest BengalBiharKarnatakaAndhra PradeshTelanganaKeralaMadhya PradeshRajasthanDelhiOther StatesNotably, the Bharatiya Janata Party have racked up the PoK issue in their campaign across the country. Several BJP leaders are highlighting that the territory belongs to India only.The Home Minister Amit Shah in a rally on May 20 in Delhi emphasized that Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir will remain India’s forever.”The leader of the INDI Alliance says do not talk about POK; respect Pakistan because it has atom bomb. Rahul Baba, we are the people of the BJP; we are not afraid of atom bombs. PoK belongs to India, will remain so and we will take it,” Shah said.Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, on Sunday said that the vision of securing over 400 seats in the Lok Sabha elections needs to be realised to integrate Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) into India.

    “The vision of ‘Abki Baar, 400 Paar’ needs to be realised to make PoK a part of India,” UP CM said.

  • Varanasi: PM Modi to hold road show in Varanasi on May 13 before filing nomination

    Varanasi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be filing his nomination papers from the Varanasi Lok Sabha seat on May 14 and before filling his nomination papers, he will hold a road show in his parliamentary constituency on May 13.

    Before starting the roadshow, PM Modi will first pay tribute to the Madan Mohan Malviya statue at the main gate of Banaras Hindu University (BHU) in Lanka.

    The roadshow will go until Kashi Vishwanath Corridor.The high-voltage roadshow is likely to see the participation of lakhs of workers from the party.AllUttar PradeshMaharashtraTamil NaduWest BengalBiharKarnatakaAndhra PradeshTelanganaKeralaMadhya PradeshRajasthanDelhiOther StatesMeanwhile, preparations are underway for the PM’s roadshow. In the Lok Sabha management committee meeting held in Varanasi, regional president Dilip Patel said that PM Modi’s roadshow will start by garlanding the Malviya statue in Lanka.”It will go to the Vishwanath Corridor via Assi, Sonarpura, Jangam Bari, Godaulia, and Bansphatak,” he added.PM Modi will be given a grand welcome during this. Responsibilities are being assigned to the workers to make the road show historic.Meetings of all the assembly constituencies in the Varanasi parliamentary constituency have been organised for tomorrow. After this, meetings will be held with workers in all 21 divisions in one day. The organisation is busy preparing with the target of participation of lakhs of workers in this roadshow.

    Varanasi is the stronghold of the Prime Minister. He won the seat twice – the 2014 and 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

    Congress has pitted Uttar Pradesh Congress chief Ajay Rai against PM Modi in Varanasi. This is the third time Ajay Rai will face PM Modi in a Lok Sabha contest

    In the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, PM Modi won the seat with over 674,664 votes and commanded a vote share of 63.6 per cent.

    Earlier in 2014, PM Modi fought on two Lok Sabha seats in Gujarat’s Vadodara and the second was Uttar Pradesh’s Varanasi.

    The Varanasi seat comprises five Assembly segments including Rohaniya, Varanasi North, Varanasi South, Varanasi Cantt, and Sevapuri.

    The voting for the Varanasi Lok Sabha constituency will be held in the seventh phase of the elections on June 1. The counting of the votes will be held on June 4.

  • Gyanvapi Case: Hindu side files petition in District Court; urges to protect ‘Vyas Ka Tehkhana’ – The Economic Times Video

    New Delhi: The Hindu’s side in the Gyanvapi case has filed a petition in the Varanasi District Court, urging it to protect the ‘Vyas Ka Tehkhana’ (cellar), where the Hindus have been worshipping after the court’s order in January. Vishnu Shankar Jain, the lawyer of the Hindu side, has said that there are continuous attempts made by the members of the Muslim community, who are going to offer ‘namaz’, to ‘demolish’ the cellar.

  • Gyanvapi Mosque Case: Allahabad HC Upholds Varanasi Court Order Allowing Hindu Side To Offer Prayer In Vyas Tehkhana |

    The Allahabad High Court today upheld the Varanasi Court order allowing Hindu side to offer prayer in ‘Vyas Ka Tehkhana’ in the Gyanvapi Mosque. The High Court refused to put a stay on the Varanasi court’s order and the Muslim side said that they will file a caveat in the Supreme Court against the order. 

    Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, who represented the Hindu side said, “Today, the Allahabad High Court has dismissed the first appeal from orders of Anjuman Intezamia wherein the order of 17th and 31st January passed by Varanasi District Court was under challenge before Allahabad High Court. The crux of the matter is that the ongoing puja in the ‘Vyas Tehkhana’ of Gyanvapi complex will continue.”

    The Allahabad High Court delivered the verdict on an appeal filed by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee (AIMC) in which the Muslim side challenged the order of Varanasi District Judge allowing Hindu devotees to offer prayers inside the ‘Vyas Ka Tehkhana’ area in the Gyanvapi mosque complex. Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal of Allahabad High Court delievered the judgement today after reserving the decision during the last hearing. The mosque has four ‘tahkhanas’ (cellars) in the basement, of which one is still in the possession of the Vyas family, who used to live there.

    Reacting to the judgement, Advocate Prabhash Pandey said that as per the order, Varanasi District Magistrate will continue as the Receiver of the ‘tehkhana’.

    Advocate Hari Shankar Jain, said, “It is a decision worth welcoming. The right that Hindus have to perform puja has been maintained by the High Court. Hindus were performing puja in the Vyas Tehkhana until 1993, but they were stopped unlawfully. They (the Muslim side) can move Supreme Court, but we are also ready to oppose.”

    On January 31, the Varanasi district court allowed the Hindu side to offer prayers in the southern cellar of Gyanvapi mosque. The court directed the Varanasi district magistrate to make arrangements within seven days for ‘puja’ to be performed by the Hindu side and a pujari (priest) nominated by Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Trust.

  • Varanasi: Priyanka Gandhi should contest from Varanasi against Modi: WB CM Mamata Banerjee – The Economic Times Video

    Find this comment offensive?

    Choose your reason below and click on the Report button. This will alert our moderators to take action

    Name

    Reason for reporting:

    Foul languageSlanderousInciting hatred against a certain communityOthers

    Your Reason has been Reported to the admin.

  • BREAKING: Gyanvapi Masjid Survey Case: ASI Submits Report To Varanasi District Court |

    NEW DELHI: In a significant development, the Archeological Survey of India (ASI) on Monday submitted its report on the scientific survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex. ASI submitted a sealed report on the Gyanvapi Mosque survey to the Varanasi court. The ASI submitted the report before the Varanasi district Judge AK Vishvesha. On the other hand, a petition has been moved by the Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee (which manages Gyanvapi Mosque) seeking information about the survey report,

    It may be noted that the ASI conducted a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi complex in Varanasi as per the July 21 order of the Varanasi District Judge to determine if the mosque was constructed over a pre-existing structure of a Hindu temple.

    ASI’s advocate Amit Kumar, while speaking to reporters, said several important evidence pointing to the existence of a temple, have been found and submitted to the court. Advocate Amit Kumar said that the ASI report is very crucial and will play a decisive role in settling the Kashi Vishwanath Temple-Gyanvapi Mosque dispute between the Hindu and the Muslim sides.   

    It may be noted that the ASI had earlier requested the Varanasi District Court, seeking additional time to conclude the survey and submit its report. Varanasi District Court Judge AK Vishvesh had then fixed December 18 as the next date of hearing in the matter. It is important to note that the district court has already given several extensions in the past to the ASI to submit its survey report.

    Earlier on November 30, the district court had given 10 days and ordered the ASI to file the report within the “provided time.” Before November 30, the court had asked the ASI to submit its report on November 17, and later on November 28 to file its report.

    Importantly, on August 4, the Supreme Court refused to stop the ASI from surveying the Gyanvapi Mosque at Varanasi, except the ‘wuzukhana’ area where a ‘shivling’ was claimed to have been found last year. 

    Taking on record an undertaking made on behalf of the ASI that no excavation would be done at the site and no damage would be caused to the structure, the court had allowed the survey to take place.

    On November 2, the ASI told the district court it had “completed” the survey but would need some more time to compile the report, along with the details of the equipment used in the survey.

    The ASI had been surveying since August 4 on the mosque premises. The survey was ordered by a Varanasi court on July 21, following a petition by four women who sought permission to pray at the Shringar Gauri Shrine which is behind the western wall of the temple.

  • Supreme Court refuses to halt ASI survey at Gyanvapi mosque, says it should be ‘non-invasive’

    Express News Service

    The Supreme Court on Friday refused to halt the ASI survey which is currently being carried at the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, dismissing a plea filed by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee against the Allahabad High Court’s order allowing it.

    A bench of CJI DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra allowed a “non-invasive survey” without causing any excavation or destruction of the mosque.

    The bench also turned down the Masjid Committee’s request to direct the ASI to submit its report to the district judge in a “sealed cover”.

    “The order of the trial judge under order 26 rule 10A CPC cannot prima facie be construed to be without jurisdiction. While recording submissions to the effect that the survey shall not involve any excavation or destruction, we also order and direct for conducting the process by using non-invasive methodology. There shall be no excavation at the site. The report of the ASI shall in terms of provisions of order 26 be remitted to the trial court,” the bench said in its order.

    ALSO READ | ASI begins survey of Gyanvapi mosque complex amid tight security

    Challenging the High Court’s order, senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi appearing for the masjid committee said that the act of conducting the survey was contrary to the provisions of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. “When you start digging into the past, the process is such that you are uncovering the past. When you order a survey, when you see as to what existed, you’re unravelling the wounds of the past,” Ahmadi said.

    On the other hand, senior advocate Madhavi Diwan submitted that the survey was neither prejudicial nor adversarial.

    Earlier, an Allahabad HC bench led by Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker had said the survey is necessary in the interest of justice and noted the ASI’s stand that no damage will be caused to the mosque.

    “Once the Department of Archaeology and learned Senior Counsel representing the Department have made their stand clear that no damage is going to be caused to the property in question, this Court has no reason to doubt their statements and most importantly, the affidavit filed by the officer of the ASI explaining the circumstances. Further, it is settled proposition of law that issue of a Commission, at this stage, is permissible. In the opinion of the Court, the scientific survey/investigation proposed to be carried out by the Commission, is necessary in the interest of justice and shall benefit the plaintiffs and defendants alike and come in aid of the trial court to arrive at a just decision. The law laid down and discussed above, make it clear that the Court below was justified in passing the impugned order. The present petition lacks substance and is liable to be dismissed,” the HC had said in its order.

    Challenging the order, the Masjid Committee in the plea had said that the HC went into the nature of exercise but did not consider the sensitivity of the order passed in 2021. It was also contended that the Supreme Court’s order to protect the Wazukhana protected the whole mosque and not just the particular area.

    “The impugned order is further liable to be set aside on account of grave risks posed by such an exercise which may have consequences throughout the country, as have been witnessed throughout these proceedings since a survey of the Gyanwapi Mosque was permitted, absolutely against the provisions of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991,” the plea stated.

    The Supreme Court on Friday refused to halt the ASI survey which is currently being carried at the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, dismissing a plea filed by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee against the Allahabad High Court’s order allowing it.

    A bench of CJI DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra allowed a “non-invasive survey” without causing any excavation or destruction of the mosque.

    The bench also turned down the Masjid Committee’s request to direct the ASI to submit its report to the district judge in a “sealed cover”.googletag.cmd.push(function() {googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); });

    “The order of the trial judge under order 26 rule 10A CPC cannot prima facie be construed to be without jurisdiction. While recording submissions to the effect that the survey shall not involve any excavation or destruction, we also order and direct for conducting the process by using non-invasive methodology. There shall be no excavation at the site. The report of the ASI shall in terms of provisions of order 26 be remitted to the trial court,” the bench said in its order.

    ALSO READ | ASI begins survey of Gyanvapi mosque complex amid tight security

    Challenging the High Court’s order, senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi appearing for the masjid committee said that the act of conducting the survey was contrary to the provisions of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. “When you start digging into the past, the process is such that you are uncovering the past. When you order a survey, when you see as to what existed, you’re unravelling the wounds of the past,” Ahmadi said.

    On the other hand, senior advocate Madhavi Diwan submitted that the survey was neither prejudicial nor adversarial.

    Earlier, an Allahabad HC bench led by Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker had said the survey is necessary in the interest of justice and noted the ASI’s stand that no damage will be caused to the mosque.

    “Once the Department of Archaeology and learned Senior Counsel representing the Department have made their stand clear that no damage is going to be caused to the property in question, this Court has no reason to doubt their statements and most importantly, the affidavit filed by the officer of the ASI explaining the circumstances. Further, it is settled proposition of law that issue of a Commission, at this stage, is permissible. In the opinion of the Court, the scientific survey/investigation proposed to be carried out by the Commission, is necessary in the interest of justice and shall benefit the plaintiffs and defendants alike and come in aid of the trial court to arrive at a just decision. The law laid down and discussed above, make it clear that the Court below was justified in passing the impugned order. The present petition lacks substance and is liable to be dismissed,” the HC had said in its order.

    Challenging the order, the Masjid Committee in the plea had said that the HC went into the nature of exercise but did not consider the sensitivity of the order passed in 2021. It was also contended that the Supreme Court’s order to protect the Wazukhana protected the whole mosque and not just the particular area.

    “The impugned order is further liable to be set aside on account of grave risks posed by such an exercise which may have consequences throughout the country, as have been witnessed throughout these proceedings since a survey of the Gyanwapi Mosque was permitted, absolutely against the provisions of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991,” the plea stated.

  • Gyanvapi issue: Pleas of four Hindu women plaintiffs to be shifted to Varanasi district court

    Express News Service

    LUCKNOW: In a major decision, Varanasi District Court Judge Dr Ajay Krishna Vishvesha on Monday accepted the plea of four Hindu women plaintiffs in suit no. 18/2022 (Rakhi Singh vs state of UP and others) seeking transfer of seven cases related to the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri issue from various courts to his court. As per district government counsel (civil) Mahendra Prasad Pandey, the district judge ordered to transfer seven cases related to Gyanvapi mosque issue to his court by accepting the plea of plaintiffs 2 to 5 (Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas and Rekha Pathak) where they had sought regular worship of Maa Shringar Gauri and other deities on the Gyanvapi mosque premises.

    In his order, district judge Dr Ajay Krishna Vishvesha also mentioned that after the transfer of the seven Gyanvapi related cases pending in different civil courts to his court, the issue of their consolidation would be examined to ascertain whether it would be relevant or not. The next date for hearing in the case was posted on April 21.

    ALSO READ | In UP badlands, will Atiq’s killing see new breed of criminals who seek fame by targeting bigger fish?

    Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain representing four women plaintiffs had moved an application on December 5, 2022 for transfer of seven cases including the one filed by Bhagwan Aadi Vishweshwar Viraajman through next friend Kiran Singh and others pending with civil judge (senior division) Fast Track Court and other six cases to the district judge court.

    Jain, in his application, had mentioned that those six cases pending in the court of civil judge (senior division) and the one in fast-track court of the civil judge (senior division) were of similar nature, hence if they were tried together, it would save both the public time and money along with avoiding other legal challenges.

    However, Shivam Gaur, the advocate of plaintiff-1 Rakhi Singh and Anjuman Intejamia Masajid (AIM) — the Gyanvapi mosque management committee — had strongly opposed the application to club all the petitions in their arguments which were completed on February 22 when the court had reserved its order. However, when contacted, Gaur said that he was satisfied with the order of the court as it had ordered for only their transfer from other courts to his court so far and not for consolidating them.

    LUCKNOW: In a major decision, Varanasi District Court Judge Dr Ajay Krishna Vishvesha on Monday accepted the plea of four Hindu women plaintiffs in suit no. 18/2022 (Rakhi Singh vs state of UP and others) seeking transfer of seven cases related to the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri issue from various courts to his court. As per district government counsel (civil) Mahendra Prasad Pandey, the district judge ordered to transfer seven cases related to Gyanvapi mosque issue to his court by accepting the plea of plaintiffs 2 to 5 (Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas and Rekha Pathak) where they had sought regular worship of Maa Shringar Gauri and other deities on the Gyanvapi mosque premises.

    In his order, district judge Dr Ajay Krishna Vishvesha also mentioned that after the transfer of the seven Gyanvapi related cases pending in different civil courts to his court, the issue of their consolidation would be examined to ascertain whether it would be relevant or not. The next date for hearing in the case was posted on April 21.

    ALSO READ | In UP badlands, will Atiq’s killing see new breed of criminals who seek fame by targeting bigger fish?googletag.cmd.push(function() {googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); });

    Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain representing four women plaintiffs had moved an application on December 5, 2022 for transfer of seven cases including the one filed by Bhagwan Aadi Vishweshwar Viraajman through next friend Kiran Singh and others pending with civil judge (senior division) Fast Track Court and other six cases to the district judge court.

    Jain, in his application, had mentioned that those six cases pending in the court of civil judge (senior division) and the one in fast-track court of the civil judge (senior division) were of similar nature, hence if they were tried together, it would save both the public time and money along with avoiding other legal challenges.

    However, Shivam Gaur, the advocate of plaintiff-1 Rakhi Singh and Anjuman Intejamia Masajid (AIM) — the Gyanvapi mosque management committee — had strongly opposed the application to club all the petitions in their arguments which were completed on February 22 when the court had reserved its order. However, when contacted, Gaur said that he was satisfied with the order of the court as it had ordered for only their transfer from other courts to his court so far and not for consolidating them.