‘The world is full of conflict, polarization, and uncertainty. India wants to find and expand common ground,’ Jaishankar stated, favoring dialogue over confrontation and consensus over division. He insisted on zero tolerance for terrorism, labeling it an unjustifiable assault on innocents and a core human rights breach.

India enters its seventh term on the Council backed by overwhelming support—177 votes out of 188—carrying the hopes of the Global South. Jaishankar committed to advancing rights via genuine partnerships, rejecting politicization, selectivity, or hypocrisy.

He outlined India’s perspective rooted in its democratic journey: overcoming poverty and crises while embracing pluralism. Any regional instability or marginalized group weakens universal rights, he noted, subtly rebuking some Western critics for narrow focuses.

Technology should amplify human rights, not divide societies, Jaishankar argued. India’s DPI exemplifies this, delivering efficient welfare, finance, and services to millions with transparency. Amid rising threats from pandemics, climate crises, and economic strains, he stressed scaling such innovations globally.

Jaishankar’s address reframed human rights as intertwined with security and development, urging the Council to prioritize terrorism combat and inclusive growth. India’s sharing of DPI insights positions it as a leader in equitable progress, offering a model for bridging global divides.

Posting on social media platform X, Shah paid obeisance to the soldiers who perished in the dastardly 2019 attack. He highlighted the enduring debt the country owes to security personnel for their bravery and sacrifices. This annual ritual of remembrance strengthens national unity against terror threats emanating from across the border.

Lt Governor Manoj Sinha of Jammu and Kashmir described the martyrs’ dedication as a beacon for all citizens. BJP chief JP Nadda emphasized how their heroism instills power and inspiration across the populace. Delhi CM Rekha Gupta’s tribute focused on the supreme sacrifice for Mother India, vowing eternal gratitude.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi kicked off the commemorations, reminiscing about the bravehearts’ loyalty and service that remains indelible. The February 14, 2019, incident saw a massive IED blast targeting CRPF personnel, killing 40 and injuring many. It prompted Operation Balakot, showcasing India’s proactive defense posture.

Five years on, the incident fuels policy reforms, including the abrogation of Article 370, aimed at curbing terror breeding grounds. Leaders’ messages today not only mourn but mobilize, reinforcing that India’s security apparatus stands vigilant. The martyrs’ legacy drives the mission: a terror-free nation, where peace prevails over prejudice.

The audacity of this maneuver lies in Pakistan’s own problematic history with terrorism. Decades of supporting and exporting terror, evidenced by past incidents involving individuals of Pakistani origin or direct links to Pakistani soil, create a stark contrast to its current accusations against Afghanistan. The recent attacks, including one near the White House and another in Tajikistan targeting Chinese workers, have become the focal points of Pakistan’s propaganda. By highlighting Afghanistan’s alleged involvement, Munir aims to incite a strong response from Washington and Beijing.

However, the Taliban has pushed back forcefully against these allegations. A Taliban spokesperson suggested that Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the ISI, might be behind the staged incidents. This counter-accusation implies that Pakistan seeks to destabilize Afghanistan due to its strengthening relationships with India and the broader international community, using familiar tactics of false flag operations and disinformation to achieve its geopolitical aims.

This alleged initiative is met with accusations of profound hypocrisy, given Pakistan’s history with terrorism. Critics point to the nation’s past support for militant groups and individuals designated as terrorists, contrasting it with its current stance. The current narrative focuses on framing Afghanistan as the epicenter of international terror, a stark reversal from its own documented involvement in fostering extremist elements. Pakistan is reportedly seeking international intervention to neutralize the Taliban, a task it is deemed incapable of undertaking independently.

Two specific incidents are cited as catalysts for this alleged Pakistani strategy. An attack on National Guard soldiers near the White House by an individual identified as an Afghan national, and a drone strike in Tajikistan that killed Chinese workers, reportedly launched from Afghan soil. Pakistan is reportedly emphasizing these events to highlight a perceived escalating threat emanating from Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, aiming to secure the cooperation of the United States and China. The narrative seeks to convince these superpowers that Afghanistan poses a direct and immediate danger, necessitating decisive action.

However, the Taliban has vehemently denied these accusations, with a spokesperson suggesting that Pakistan’s intelligence agency, ISI, may be orchestrating such incidents to frame the Taliban. This counter-narrative asserts that Pakistan’s motive is to disrupt Afghanistan’s improving international relations and its burgeoning ties with India. The Taliban’s response suggests a belief that Pakistan is resorting to familiar tactics of false flag operations and propaganda to achieve its strategic objectives through proxy action by global powers.

This broadened investigation stems from the Delhi blast that occurred on November 10th. Agencies are delving deeper into potential connections involving Umar Nabi, the alleged suicide bomber in the Red Fort blast, and his ties to Al-Falah University. Notably, approximately 30 doctors from Al-Falah University have already been questioned as part of this expanding inquiry.

The notice issued to at least one Delhi hospital specifically requests the identification of medical practitioners holding degrees from Pakistan, Bangladesh, UAE, or China. Investigators are keen to ascertain any links between these individuals and the prevailing security situation following the Red Fort incident. The urgency of the request underscores the sensitive nature of the ongoing investigation.

Further scrutiny is being directed at Al-Falah University. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has recorded statements from 30 doctors, focusing on their interactions and observations regarding Umar Nabi. Reports indicate that colleagues described Umar’s behavior as often rude and noted that he restricted access to his room. Authorities are also examining a mobile phone belonging to Umar, seized by Jammu & Kashmir Police, which reportedly contains videos justifying violent extremism. The aim is to identify potential accomplices through this digital evidence. Several suspects connected to the Red Fort blast and a dismantled terror module have already been apprehended in connection with the case.

The audacious plan is steeped in hypocrisy. Pakistan, which has been widely criticized for its role in fostering terrorism, is now positioning itself as a victim and accusing Afghanistan of being a threat. This is the same country that provided sanctuary to Osama bin Laden and nurtured figures like Hafiz Saeed. Munir’s objective is to exploit recent events, such as the attack near the White House and a drone strike in Tajikistan, to convince the global community that Taliban-controlled Afghanistan poses an imminent danger. The aim is to make the US and China act against the Taliban where Pakistan’s own military has fallen short.

Key incidents, including an attack on National Guard soldiers in Washington D.C. and a drone strike in Tajikistan that killed Chinese workers, are being amplified by Pakistan. Both events, allegedly linked to Afghanistan, provide Munir with the propaganda fodder needed to advance his agenda. By highlighting these incidents, Pakistan seeks to portray a unified threat emanating from Afghanistan, thereby enlisting the support of global powers for its own strategic objectives. This move is seen as a desperate attempt to regain influence and destabilize a region where its own military capabilities have been insufficient to achieve its goals.

The international community is now scrutinizing Pakistan’s narrative, given its historical involvement with terror networks. Past incidents involving individuals of Pakistani origin planning or executing attacks in the US and other countries cast a shadow of doubt over Pakistan’s claims. The Taliban has vehemently denied these accusations, with a spokesperson suggesting that Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the ISI, is behind these incidents to frame the Taliban and disrupt its improving international relations, particularly with India.