During an IANS interview, Naqvi laid bare what he called a ‘chronology of criminal acts’ meticulously orchestrated by Congress. He harked back to 2015, when heads of state from 54 African countries gathered in India, only for the ‘Return of Awards’ movement to hog headlines and undermine the occasion.

Fast-forward to 2019-20: As American President and his team landed amid international media glare, Shaheen Bagh blockades protesting CAA dominated narratives. ‘While PM Modi and Trump deliberated crucial issues, global reporters chased chaos at JNU and Shaheen Bagh,’ Naqvi observed.

The pattern persisted at the G20, with Rahul Gandhi’s globe-trotting rants about constitutional threats. At the ongoing AI Summit drawing 20-nation representatives, Congress stooped to vulgar protests. ‘They can’t fathom a poor, backward-class man propelling India forward,’ Naqvi remarked pointedly.

Constitutional rights allow expression, Naqvi stressed, but not license for hooliganism. ‘If Congress persists in these conspiracies to malign India, their downfall is certain,’ he predicted.

Commenting on Gujarat’s parental consent mandate for weddings, Naqvi called for straightforward social policies rooted in transparency. ‘Governments act with pure intent—to foster societal good without ambiguities.’

Naqvi’s words resonate as a broader indictment of opposition tactics, positioning Modi’s India as resilient against orchestrated sabotage. With AI innovation at the forefront, such protests merely underscore Congress’s irrelevance in a rising nation.

The hearing was conducted by a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta. Justice Mehta stated that the tweet was not merely a retweet but contained added commentary, making it a matter for trial.

The Supreme Court, while addressing the case, noted that even though the tweet was a retweet from another user, the case couldn’t be dismissed. The court added that the matter necessitates a trial. The court also made strong remarks, advising against commenting on the tweets to avoid negatively impacting the case. The court then inquired if Ranaut wished to withdraw her petition, leading her to do so following the court’s comments.

Ranaut’s lawyer argued that the tweet was a retweet, with the original tweet from someone else. The lawyer maintained that the tweet was misunderstood, and many people had retweeted it. The lawyer further stated that the case was filed, and a lower court issued a summons, with the High Court also denying relief. The lawyer added that the original tweet was not from Kangana.

The Supreme Court initiated a hearing on Kangana Ranaut’s petition regarding her disparaging comment made against a woman during the 2020-21 farmers’ protest. In her comment, she falsely identified the woman as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh. The complaint was filed in 2021 by 73-year-old Mahinder Kaur from Bathinda district, who alleged that Ranaut made false accusations against her in a retweet, claiming she was the same elderly woman (Bilkis Bano) who participated in the Shaheen Bagh protests.