Tag: Om Birla

  • Lok Sabha Live Updates: NDA Vs Opposition On Speaker Post, Om Birla Vs K Suresh| Updates |

    Lok Sabha Speaker Election: Kota MP Om Birla, who previously served as Lok Sabha Speaker of the previous House, submitted his nomination as an NDA candidate on Tuesday. Birla’s name was unanimously agreed upon by all NDA parties, and senior BJP leader Rajnath Singh also sought the opposition’s support. The INDIA bloc fielded Congress leader K Suresh as its candidate for the Speaker’s position against Om Birla, accusing the ruling NDA of failing to follow convention in handing over the Dy speaker position to the opposition.

    Congress leader K C Venugopal and DMK’s T R Baalu walked out of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh’s office, refusing to endorse NDA candidate Birla unless they were offered the position of Deputy Speaker. Venugopal stated that the BJP refused to commit to offering the Deputy Speaker position to the opposition.

    Union ministers Piyush Goyal and Lalan Singh accused the Congress of imposing conditions, adding that the ruling alliance was willing to discuss their demand when the election for Deputy Speaker took place.

    According to sources, over ten sets of nominations were filed in support of Birla’s candidature, including those from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union ministers Shah, Singh, and Nadda, as well as BJP allies such as the TDP, JD(U), JD(S), and LJP(R).

    Three nominations were submitted in support of Suresh, a Dalit leader and eight-term MP.

    Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had clarified on Tuesday that the INDIA bloc will only support the government’s nomination if the opposition is given the deputy speaker’s position. He also said that Defence Minister and senior BJP leader Rajnath Singh had yet to respond to the opposition’s request for the post of deputy speaker. Gandhi also accused the BJP of insulting Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge. 

    While speaking to reporters outside the Parliament house, Gandhi said, “Today it is written in the newspaper that PM Modi has said that the Opposition should cooperate with the Govt constructively. Rajnath Singh called Mallikarjun Kharge and he asked him to extend support to the Speaker. The entire Opposition said that we would support the Speaker but the convention is that the Deputy Speaker post should be given to the opposition.”

    #WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says “Today it is written in the newspaper that PM Modi has said that the Opposition should cooperate with the Govt constructively. Rajnath Singh called Mallikarjun Kharge and he asked him to extend support to the Speaker. The entire… pic.twitter.com/yR5CzlagEx


    — ANI (@ANI) June 25, 2024

    “Rajnath Singh said that he would call back Mallikarjun Kharge but he has not done that yet…PM Modi is asking for cooperation from Opposition but our leader is getting insulted…,” he said.

    Here are the live updates on Lok Sabha speaker’s election: 

    12:30 pm: Congress leader K C Venugopal and DMK’s T R Baalu walked out of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh’s office, refusing to endorse NDA candidate Birla unless they were offered the position of Deputy Speaker.

    Venugopal stated that the BJP refused to commit to offering the Deputy Speaker position to the opposition.

    12:00 pm: Union ministers Piyush Goyal and Lalan Singh accused the Congress of imposing conditions, saying the ruling alliance was willing to discuss their demand when the election for Deputy Speaker was held.

  • Supreme Court seeks Lok Sabha secretary general’s reply on Mahua Moitra’s expulsion plea

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought a reply from the Lok Sabha secretary general on Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging her expulsion from the Lower House. A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta refused to pass any order on an interim prayer of Moitra to let her attend the proceedings of the House, saying, allowing it would be like allowing the main petition.

    “We will consider your plea for interim relief in March,” Justice Khanna told Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for Moitra.

    The top court also refused to issue any notice to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and the Committee on Ethics of Lok Sabha — both were made a party by Moitra in her plea — and said it would only seek a reply from the Lok Sabha secretary general. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Lok Sabha secretary general, requested the court not to issue a formal notice and said that he would file a reply to Moitra’s petition.

    Mehta said the court should not venture into the internal matter of discipline in the sovereign organ of the state. The bench then passed the order and listed the matter for further hearing in the week starting March 11.

    On December 8, after a heated debate in the Lok Sabha over the panel report, during which Moitra was not allowed to speak, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi moved a motion to expel the TMC MP from the House for “unethical conduct,” which was adopted by a voice vote. The ethics committee found Moitra guilty of “unethical conduct” and contempt of the House as she shared her Lok Sabha members’ portal credentials — user ID and password — with unauthorised people, which had an irrepressible impact on national security, Joshi had said. The committee had also recommended that in view of the “highly objectionable, unethical, heinous and criminal conduct” of Moitra, an intense legal and institutional inquiry be initiated by the government with a set deadline.

    The motion moved by Joshi said Moitra’s “conduct has further been found to be unbecoming as an MP for accepting gifts and illegal gratification from a businessman to further his interest, which is a serious misdemeanour and highly deplorable conduct” on her part.

    Earlier, ethics committee Chairman Vinod Kumar Sonkar had tabled the first report of the panel on a complaint filed by Bharatiya Janata Party MP Nishikant Dubey against Moitra.

    In October last year, Dubey, on the basis of a complaint submitted by Supreme Court lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai, alleged that Moitra had asked questions in the Lok Sabha in exchange for cash and gifts from businessman Darshan Hiranandani to mount an attack on industrialist Gautam Adani and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

    In an affidavit to the ethics committee on October 19, last year, Hiranandani claimed that Moitra had provided him with her login ID and password for the Lok Sabha members’ website.

    The Central Bureau of Investigation has already filed a preliminary FIR in the case.

  • BJP MP makes ‘Cash for Query’ allegations against Mahua Moitra

    By ANI

    NEW DELHI: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has written a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla making “cash for query” allegations against Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra and demanding an inquiry committee against her.

    He urged for her ‘immediate suspension’ from the House alleging that “bribes were exchanged between her and businessman Darshan Hiranandani to ask questions in Parliament in exchange for cash and gifts”.

    In his letter titled “Re-emergence of nasty ‘Cash for Query’ in Parliament”, Dubey has alleged “serious Breach of Privilege’, ‘Contempt of the House’ and a ‘Criminal Offence’ under Section 120A of IPC” by the Trinamool Congress MP.

    Reacting to the complaint, about which Dubey also tweeted, Moitra said she will welcome any motion once the pending breach of privileges against ruling party members are dealt with.

    “Multiple breach of privileges pending against fake degreewala & other @BJP4India luminaries. Welcome any motions against me right after Speaker finishes dealing with those. Also waiting for @dir_ed & others to file FIR in Adani coal scam before coming to my doorstep,” she said in a post on ‘X’.

    Multiple breach of privileges pending against fake degreewala & other @BJP4India luminaries. Welcome any motions against me right after Speaker finishes dealing with those.Also waiting for @dir_ed & others to file FIR in Adani coal scam before coming to my doorstep.
    — Mahua Moitra (@MahuaMoitra) October 15, 2023
    In his letter, Dubey has written that he is in receipt of a letter from Jai Anant Dehadrai, Advocate, in which he has shared “irrefutable evidence of bribes allegedly exchanged between Mohua Moitra and Darshan Hiranandani, a well-known business tycoon, to ask questions in Parliament in exchange for ‘Cash’ and ‘Gifts’.”

    The letter says that it appears that the person making the representation, Jai Anant Dehadrai, has “done elaborate and painstaking research” based on which, he has concluded that till recently “Smt. Moitra asked approximately 50 questions in Parliament, out of total 61. posted by her, which shockingly seek information, with the intent of protecting or perpetuating business interests of Shri Darshan Hiranandani and his company.”

    The letter says the questions were also often focused on the Adani Group, “another business conglomerate, Hiranandani Group was bidding for business against”.

    Dubey claimed in his letter “the representationist has forwarded all the papers and documents in support of information” and he is enclosing them.

    The letter said the documents are “reminiscent of ‘Cash for Query’ episode of December 12, 2005”

    The letter alleged “quid pro quo to raise money from a businessman in lieu of asking questions in Lok Sabha, targeting another business Group”.

    “Now, with the unmasking of quid pro quo in the form of ugly and deliberate motive of Smt Mahua Moitra, to raise money from a businessman in leu of asking questions in Lok Sabha, targeting another business Group, it has become amply clear that the edifice of ‘morality’ being exhibited by Smt Mahua Moitra was nothing but a ‘Machiavellian Camouflage’ for committing a crime by entering into a criminal conspiracy and at the same time enjoying the title given to Smt Mahua Moitra: as a firebrand Member of Parliament’ which is nothing but a sham” said the letter from Nishikant Dubey.

    The letter alleges that the “instant episode is nothing but a re-emergence of ‘cash for query’.

    It said that when a similar episode happened on December 12, 2005 during the Fourteenth Lok Sabha, the then Speaker immediately constituted an Inquiry Committee on December 12 , 2005 itself and subsequently 10 members were expelled from the membership of Lok Sabha on December 23, 2005 in 23 days.

    “Since the instant episode is nothing but a re-emergence of Cash for Query’ by Smt Mahua Moitra, Member of Parliament, I humbly request your goodself to constitute an ‘Inquiry Committee, by following the past precedent. I also request you that during the interregnum period, i.e. constitution of an ‘Inquiry Committee and its submission of Report, Smt Mahua Moitra may be immediately suspended from the services of the House so that she may not be able to enter in the precincts of the Parliament and does not further attempt to vitiate the sanctity, that is synonymous with Parliament,” the letter said.

    In his post on X Nishikant Dubey alleged that there had been exchange of several gifts.

    “This very house cancelled membership of 11 MPs in ‘cash for questions’. Today also this theft will not work. One businessman is bad for them, but they have no qualms in taking 35 pairs of shoes from the other. Like Mrs (Imelda) Marcos the Hermes, LV, Gucci bag, purse, clothes and hawala money will not work. The membership will go, please wait” the BJP MP said.

    11 सांसद को इसी भारतीय संसद ने प्रश्न पैसे लेने के कारण सदस्यता रद्द कर दिया था, आज भी चोरी और सीनाज़ोरी नहीं चलेगी,एक व्यापारी ख़राब लेकिन दूसरे व्यापारी से 35 जोड़ी जूते श्रीमती मारकोस की आत्मा की तरह Hermes,LV,Gucci का बैग,पर्स,कपड़े,नक़द हवाला से पैसे नहीं चलेंगे । सदस्यता तो…
    — Dr Nishikant Dubey (@nishikant_dubey) October 15, 2023
    In her response also posted on X , Mahua Moitra alleged that the BJP would use agencies against her.

    “Also welcome @CBIHeadquarters enquiry into my alleged money laundering right after they finish investigating Adani’s offshore money trail, over invoicing, benami accounts. Adani may use BJP agencies to browbeat competition & buy airports but just try doing it with me” she posted on X.

    Also welcome @CBIHeadquarters enquiry into my alleged money laundering right after they finish investigating Adani’s offshore money trail, over invoicing, benami accounts.Adani may use BJP agencies to browbeat competition & buy airports but just try doing it with me.
    — Mahua Moitra (@MahuaMoitra) October 15, 2023
    Earlier the TMC MP Mahua Moitra had alleged that her personal photographs had been circulated by BJP workers.

    “Most amused to see some personal photos of me being circulated on social media by @BJP4India’s troll Sena. I like green dress better on me than white blouse. And why bother cropping – show rest of the folks at dinner as well. Bengal’s women live a life. Not a lie” she posted on X.

    With this war of words, an open battle has begun between the BJP MP from Godda, Jharkhand, and the TMC MP from Krishnanagar, West Bengal.  Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp

    NEW DELHI: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has written a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla making “cash for query” allegations against Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra and demanding an inquiry committee against her.

    He urged for her ‘immediate suspension’ from the House alleging that “bribes were exchanged between her and businessman Darshan Hiranandani to ask questions in Parliament in exchange for cash and gifts”.

    In his letter titled “Re-emergence of nasty ‘Cash for Query’ in Parliament”, Dubey has alleged “serious Breach of Privilege’, ‘Contempt of the House’ and a ‘Criminal Offence’ under Section 120A of IPC” by the Trinamool Congress MP.googletag.cmd.push(function() {googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); });

    Reacting to the complaint, about which Dubey also tweeted, Moitra said she will welcome any motion once the pending breach of privileges against ruling party members are dealt with.

    “Multiple breach of privileges pending against fake degreewala & other @BJP4India luminaries. Welcome any motions against me right after Speaker finishes dealing with those. Also waiting for @dir_ed & others to file FIR in Adani coal scam before coming to my doorstep,” she said in a post on ‘X’.

    Multiple breach of privileges pending against fake degreewala & other @BJP4India luminaries. Welcome any motions against me right after Speaker finishes dealing with those.
    Also waiting for @dir_ed & others to file FIR in Adani coal scam before coming to my doorstep.
    — Mahua Moitra (@MahuaMoitra) October 15, 2023
    In his letter, Dubey has written that he is in receipt of a letter from Jai Anant Dehadrai, Advocate, in which he has shared “irrefutable evidence of bribes allegedly exchanged between Mohua Moitra and Darshan Hiranandani, a well-known business tycoon, to ask questions in Parliament in exchange for ‘Cash’ and ‘Gifts’.”

    The letter says that it appears that the person making the representation, Jai Anant Dehadrai, has “done elaborate and painstaking research” based on which, he has concluded that till recently “Smt. Moitra asked approximately 50 questions in Parliament, out of total 61. posted by her, which shockingly seek information, with the intent of protecting or perpetuating business interests of Shri Darshan Hiranandani and his company.”

    The letter says the questions were also often focused on the Adani Group, “another business conglomerate, Hiranandani Group was bidding for business against”.

    Dubey claimed in his letter “the representationist has forwarded all the papers and documents in support of information” and he is enclosing them.

    The letter said the documents are “reminiscent of ‘Cash for Query’ episode of December 12, 2005”

    The letter alleged “quid pro quo to raise money from a businessman in lieu of asking questions in Lok Sabha, targeting another business Group”.

    “Now, with the unmasking of quid pro quo in the form of ugly and deliberate motive of Smt Mahua Moitra, to raise money from a businessman in leu of asking questions in Lok Sabha, targeting another business Group, it has become amply clear that the edifice of ‘morality’ being exhibited by Smt Mahua Moitra was nothing but a ‘Machiavellian Camouflage’ for committing a crime by entering into a criminal conspiracy and at the same time enjoying the title given to Smt Mahua Moitra: as a firebrand Member of Parliament’ which is nothing but a sham” said the letter from Nishikant Dubey.

    The letter alleges that the “instant episode is nothing but a re-emergence of ‘cash for query’.

    It said that when a similar episode happened on December 12, 2005 during the Fourteenth Lok Sabha, the then Speaker immediately constituted an Inquiry Committee on December 12 , 2005 itself and subsequently 10 members were expelled from the membership of Lok Sabha on December 23, 2005 in 23 days.

    “Since the instant episode is nothing but a re-emergence of Cash for Query’ by Smt Mahua Moitra, Member of Parliament, I humbly request your goodself to constitute an ‘Inquiry Committee, by following the past precedent. I also request you that during the interregnum period, i.e. constitution of an ‘Inquiry Committee and its submission of Report, Smt Mahua Moitra may be immediately suspended from the services of the House so that she may not be able to enter in the precincts of the Parliament and does not further attempt to vitiate the sanctity, that is synonymous with Parliament,” the letter said.

    In his post on X Nishikant Dubey alleged that there had been exchange of several gifts.

    “This very house cancelled membership of 11 MPs in ‘cash for questions’. Today also this theft will not work. One businessman is bad for them, but they have no qualms in taking 35 pairs of shoes from the other. Like Mrs (Imelda) Marcos the Hermes, LV, Gucci bag, purse, clothes and hawala money will not work. The membership will go, please wait” the BJP MP said.

    11 सांसद को इसी भारतीय संसद ने प्रश्न पैसे लेने के कारण सदस्यता रद्द कर दिया था, आज भी चोरी और सीनाज़ोरी नहीं चलेगी,एक व्यापारी ख़राब लेकिन दूसरे व्यापारी से 35 जोड़ी जूते श्रीमती मारकोस की आत्मा की तरह Hermes,LV,Gucci का बैग,पर्स,कपड़े,नक़द हवाला से पैसे नहीं चलेंगे । सदस्यता तो…
    — Dr Nishikant Dubey (@nishikant_dubey) October 15, 2023
    In her response also posted on X , Mahua Moitra alleged that the BJP would use agencies against her.

    “Also welcome @CBIHeadquarters enquiry into my alleged money laundering right after they finish investigating Adani’s offshore money trail, over invoicing, benami accounts. Adani may use BJP agencies to browbeat competition & buy airports but just try doing it with me” she posted on X.

    Also welcome @CBIHeadquarters enquiry into my alleged money laundering right after they finish investigating Adani’s offshore money trail, over invoicing, benami accounts.
    Adani may use BJP agencies to browbeat competition & buy airports but just try doing it with me.
    — Mahua Moitra (@MahuaMoitra) October 15, 2023
    Earlier the TMC MP Mahua Moitra had alleged that her personal photographs had been circulated by BJP workers.

    “Most amused to see some personal photos of me being circulated on social media by @BJP4India’s troll Sena. I like green dress better on me than white blouse. And why bother cropping – show rest of the folks at dinner as well. Bengal’s women live a life. Not a lie” she posted on X.

    With this war of words, an open battle has begun between the BJP MP from Godda, Jharkhand, and the TMC MP from Krishnanagar, West Bengal.  Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp

  • Parliament library now accessible to visually challenged

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: Visually challenged people will now have easier access to the vast repository of resources in the parliament library which is now equipped with necessary assistive technologies, officials said.

    Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Tuesday inaugurated special facilities that provide visually challenged people access to more than 1.7 million publications and resources in the library. Birla took the initiative after he found that visually impaired people were facing difficulty in accessing the library for want of digital visual aids.

    After consultations with institutes and domain experts, the Lok Sabha Secretariat procured necessary hardware and software to assist such people to access library resources, officials said.

    ALSO READ | Only parliamentary enactments can create govt fact-check unit: Experts

    Visually challenged people will be able to listen to the contents of the screen in Indian accented voices, read, translate, digitise, take audio output for any printed books, and listen to physical books, they said.

    Persons with partial blindness who can operate computers will be able to magnify the contents of the screen through magnifiers, while those having hearing impairment can have access to screen contents through Braille devices, a senior official said.

    He said the parliament library has also subscribed to Sugamaya Pustakalaya, India’s largest online library of books with access to more than six lakh book titles. These books can now be accessed by fully visually challenged people using a daisy player. 

    NEW DELHI: Visually challenged people will now have easier access to the vast repository of resources in the parliament library which is now equipped with necessary assistive technologies, officials said.

    Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Tuesday inaugurated special facilities that provide visually challenged people access to more than 1.7 million publications and resources in the library. Birla took the initiative after he found that visually impaired people were facing difficulty in accessing the library for want of digital visual aids.

    After consultations with institutes and domain experts, the Lok Sabha Secretariat procured necessary hardware and software to assist such people to access library resources, officials said.googletag.cmd.push(function() {googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); });

    ALSO READ | Only parliamentary enactments can create govt fact-check unit: Experts

    Visually challenged people will be able to listen to the contents of the screen in Indian accented voices, read, translate, digitise, take audio output for any printed books, and listen to physical books, they said.

    Persons with partial blindness who can operate computers will be able to magnify the contents of the screen through magnifiers, while those having hearing impairment can have access to screen contents through Braille devices, a senior official said.

    He said the parliament library has also subscribed to Sugamaya Pustakalaya, India’s largest online library of books with access to more than six lakh book titles. These books can now be accessed by fully visually challenged people using a daisy player. 

  • Never refer to anyone’s caste or religion in House: Lok Sabha Speaker warns members

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Monday warned members against referring to anyone’s caste and religion in the House after a Congress MP alleged that Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman made certain remarks about his proficiency in Hindi because he belonged to a particular community.

    Taking serious exception to the word used by Congress member A R Reddy to refer to his own social category during the Question Hour, the Speaker pointed out that people have not elected the members to Lok Sabha on the basis of their caste and religion.

    “Anyone here should never use such words in the House. Otherwise, I will have to take action against such a member,” the Speaker warned.

    Birla also took serious exception to the Congress member asking the Speaker not to “interrupt” him when he was asking a question.

    Birla asked the Congress leader in the House, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, to make his party members understand that they should never make such comments about the Speaker.

    “You are the Leader of the House. Make members understand that they should never comment on the Speaker in the future ‘that you (Speaker) cannot interrupt’. Did you understand what I said?” Birla said.

    The issue appeared as Reddy began asking a question on the depreciation of the rupee against the dollar, referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s earlier remark when he was the chief minister of Gujarat that the rupee was in the ICU (intensive care unit).

    “Sir, you cannot interrupt,” Reddy said as the Speaker objected to his comment and directed him to limit himself to asking the question.

    Birla warned Reddy against making such comments against the Speaker and then allowed him to ask his question.

    Responding to Reddy’s question, the finance minister said she will also give her reply in “weak Hindi” to the question asked by the Congress member in “weak Hindi.”

    The Congress member, while referring to Modi’s remarks on the value of the rupee against the dollar in the past, should have also referred to the economic indicators of that time, she said.

    “Economy was certainly in the ICU then. India was kept in fragile five,” she said.

    India is the fastest growing economy today despite the pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war, she asserted.

    “This is a matter of pride. But they are making fun of it,” she said.

    “It’s sad that they talk such things out of jealousy when our economy is doing well,” she added.

    The finance minister asserted that the Indian rupee has been strong against “every currency”.

    “And, that is proved and I can read the records,” she added.

    The US dollar is getting “stronger and stronger” due to “the policy adopted by the US Fed”, the finance minister said.

    In the last couple of weeks, the foreign reserves have gone up because of the flow of FDIs and FIIs, she said.

    “The fact remains that the reserves are going up. That’s why, at this time, talks about foreign exchange, rupee depreciation, reserves coming down or investors running away are actually not proven by data,” she added.

    NEW DELHI: Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Monday warned members against referring to anyone’s caste and religion in the House after a Congress MP alleged that Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman made certain remarks about his proficiency in Hindi because he belonged to a particular community.

    Taking serious exception to the word used by Congress member A R Reddy to refer to his own social category during the Question Hour, the Speaker pointed out that people have not elected the members to Lok Sabha on the basis of their caste and religion.

    “Anyone here should never use such words in the House. Otherwise, I will have to take action against such a member,” the Speaker warned.

    Birla also took serious exception to the Congress member asking the Speaker not to “interrupt” him when he was asking a question.

    Birla asked the Congress leader in the House, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, to make his party members understand that they should never make such comments about the Speaker.

    “You are the Leader of the House. Make members understand that they should never comment on the Speaker in the future ‘that you (Speaker) cannot interrupt’. Did you understand what I said?” Birla said.

    The issue appeared as Reddy began asking a question on the depreciation of the rupee against the dollar, referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s earlier remark when he was the chief minister of Gujarat that the rupee was in the ICU (intensive care unit).

    “Sir, you cannot interrupt,” Reddy said as the Speaker objected to his comment and directed him to limit himself to asking the question.

    Birla warned Reddy against making such comments against the Speaker and then allowed him to ask his question.

    Responding to Reddy’s question, the finance minister said she will also give her reply in “weak Hindi” to the question asked by the Congress member in “weak Hindi.”

    The Congress member, while referring to Modi’s remarks on the value of the rupee against the dollar in the past, should have also referred to the economic indicators of that time, she said.

    “Economy was certainly in the ICU then. India was kept in fragile five,” she said.

    India is the fastest growing economy today despite the pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war, she asserted.

    “This is a matter of pride. But they are making fun of it,” she said.

    “It’s sad that they talk such things out of jealousy when our economy is doing well,” she added.

    The finance minister asserted that the Indian rupee has been strong against “every currency”.

    “And, that is proved and I can read the records,” she added.

    The US dollar is getting “stronger and stronger” due to “the policy adopted by the US Fed”, the finance minister said.

    In the last couple of weeks, the foreign reserves have gone up because of the flow of FDIs and FIIs, she said.

    “The fact remains that the reserves are going up. That’s why, at this time, talks about foreign exchange, rupee depreciation, reserves coming down or investors running away are actually not proven by data,” she added.

  • Cong terms MPs suspended from LS for remaining monsoon session as ‘blot on democracy’

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: Four Congress Lok Sabha members were suspended on Monday for the rest of the Monsoon session after Speaker Om Birla took a stern view of the continuous disruptions by them, evoking a sharp reaction from the party, which termed the action against its MPs a “blot on democracy”.

    The suspension of Congress MPs –Manickam Tagore, TN Prathapan, Ramya Haridas and Jothimani– under Rule 374 for obstructing the functioning of the House, came amidst continuous demand of the Opposition for a discussion on price rise and hike in GST rates.

    Defending the suspension of these MPs from Lok Sabha, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi said the government is ready for discussion on price rise, but the MPs did not respect the chair and created a ruckus by violating the laws.

    As the protesting opposition members again stalled Lok Sabha proceedings on Monday after the near washout first week of the current session, the Chair named the Congress MPs.

    When members are named, they have to immediately withdraw from the chamber of the House. Joshi then moved a resolution to suspend the four for the rest of the session. He said these MPs have shown “utter disregard” for the authority of the Chair and a “serious note of their misconduct” had been taken by the House.

    Earlier, Speaker Om Birla had warned the protesting members, including from the Congress, TMC and DMK, that those who continue to shout slogans and display placards will have to do it outside the House after 3 pm.

    As the other opposition members continued to protest, a visibly peeved Birla told them that the government was ready to discuss issues raised by them and stressed that people want the House to function. Birla then adjourned the House till 3 pm.

    However, as the House proceedings resumed, waving of placards and sloganeering continued, drowning the voices of members participating in the Zero Hour.

    Rajendra Agarwal, who was chairing the proceedings, asked the opposition members to take note of the warning given by the Speaker. He said that the members who had been suspended had shown “stubborn behaviour”, “deliberately and continuously disrupted proceedings” and ignored House rules and directions of the Speaker.

    The House then passed the resolution by a voice vote and Agarwal announced their suspension. He then asked the members named in the resolution to immediately leave the House.

    At a press conference, Congress spokesperson Shaktisinh Gohil said there is a tradition in Parliament that suspension is done only in exceptional and rarest of rare circumstances when the member is unruly and there is no other option but to suspend that member.

    “It is a tradition of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha that the member comes to the well of the House, it gets adjourned, there is a dialogue, a middle path is found and work goes on. Suspension is not the way and in the past, the suspension has not happened in this manner,” he said. “Suspension instead of dialogue is a blot on democracy,” he said.

    Congress’ leader in Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury said the government wants to “throttle” the voice of the Opposition by resorting to “tactics of intimidation”.

    “Our demands are very simple, since day one and before the commencement of the House at the all-party meeting in the presence of Rajnath Singh, the entire Opposition had in one voice called for discussion on price rise,” he said.

    The price rise issue needs to be discussed forthwith because all people have been the victim of this, Chowdhury said.

    “But the government on one pretext or another is shying away from having a discussion on price rise. So finding no alternative in Parliament, where it is our duty to raise the issues of the common people, we were shouting that this issue should be discussed,” he said.

    “This government has resorted to a brutal measure by suspending our MPs only to throttle the voice of the Opposition. It is an anathema to the democratic ethos of our country. Day in and day out, the rights of the people, the institution of democracy is being trampled upon,” he said.

    Speaking to reporters along with the four suspended MPs outside the House, Congress’ deputy leader in LS Gaurav Gogoi said, “The government is trying to intimidate us by suspending our MPs. What was their fault? They were trying to raise the issues which matter to people.”

    The Congress party will not be cowed down like this, he asserted. The MPs were holding placards raising the issues of rising prices of gas cylinders, imposition of GST on items such as flour and buttermilk. “We moved an adjournment motion demanding a discussion on these issues, but no discussion was held,” he said.

    Tagore, one of the suspended MPs, alleged that the government “only hears the voice of the fourth-richest man in the world and not the common man.”

    Later talking to reporters, Joshi said the government has been saying that it is “ready for discussion on price rise as soon as Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman recovers from Covid.”

    Joshi termed the conduct of suspended Congress MPs in the House “unacceptable” and said, “placing placards in front of the Lok Sabha Speaker chair is not the way to protest.” “They were doing this after being warned by the Speaker,” he said.

    Joshi, who had moved the motion to suspend these MPs, said he had personally told the Congress leaders of both LS and RS that the government was ready for discussion on price rise.

    “But the Congress MPs’ action in the House shows they don’t respect the chair and the house. The action taken against them is appropriate,” he said.

    NEW DELHI: Four Congress Lok Sabha members were suspended on Monday for the rest of the Monsoon session after Speaker Om Birla took a stern view of the continuous disruptions by them, evoking a sharp reaction from the party, which termed the action against its MPs a “blot on democracy”.

    The suspension of Congress MPs –Manickam Tagore, TN Prathapan, Ramya Haridas and Jothimani– under Rule 374 for obstructing the functioning of the House, came amidst continuous demand of the Opposition for a discussion on price rise and hike in GST rates.

    Defending the suspension of these MPs from Lok Sabha, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi said the government is ready for discussion on price rise, but the MPs did not respect the chair and created a ruckus by violating the laws.

    As the protesting opposition members again stalled Lok Sabha proceedings on Monday after the near washout first week of the current session, the Chair named the Congress MPs.

    When members are named, they have to immediately withdraw from the chamber of the House. Joshi then moved a resolution to suspend the four for the rest of the session. He said these MPs have shown “utter disregard” for the authority of the Chair and a “serious note of their misconduct” had been taken by the House.

    Earlier, Speaker Om Birla had warned the protesting members, including from the Congress, TMC and DMK, that those who continue to shout slogans and display placards will have to do it outside the House after 3 pm.

    As the other opposition members continued to protest, a visibly peeved Birla told them that the government was ready to discuss issues raised by them and stressed that people want the House to function. Birla then adjourned the House till 3 pm.

    However, as the House proceedings resumed, waving of placards and sloganeering continued, drowning the voices of members participating in the Zero Hour.

    Rajendra Agarwal, who was chairing the proceedings, asked the opposition members to take note of the warning given by the Speaker. He said that the members who had been suspended had shown “stubborn behaviour”, “deliberately and continuously disrupted proceedings” and ignored House rules and directions of the Speaker.

    The House then passed the resolution by a voice vote and Agarwal announced their suspension. He then asked the members named in the resolution to immediately leave the House.

    At a press conference, Congress spokesperson Shaktisinh Gohil said there is a tradition in Parliament that suspension is done only in exceptional and rarest of rare circumstances when the member is unruly and there is no other option but to suspend that member.

    “It is a tradition of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha that the member comes to the well of the House, it gets adjourned, there is a dialogue, a middle path is found and work goes on. Suspension is not the way and in the past, the suspension has not happened in this manner,” he said. “Suspension instead of dialogue is a blot on democracy,” he said.

    Congress’ leader in Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury said the government wants to “throttle” the voice of the Opposition by resorting to “tactics of intimidation”.

    “Our demands are very simple, since day one and before the commencement of the House at the all-party meeting in the presence of Rajnath Singh, the entire Opposition had in one voice called for discussion on price rise,” he said.

    The price rise issue needs to be discussed forthwith because all people have been the victim of this, Chowdhury said.

    “But the government on one pretext or another is shying away from having a discussion on price rise. So finding no alternative in Parliament, where it is our duty to raise the issues of the common people, we were shouting that this issue should be discussed,” he said.

    “This government has resorted to a brutal measure by suspending our MPs only to throttle the voice of the Opposition. It is an anathema to the democratic ethos of our country. Day in and day out, the rights of the people, the institution of democracy is being trampled upon,” he said.

    Speaking to reporters along with the four suspended MPs outside the House, Congress’ deputy leader in LS Gaurav Gogoi said, “The government is trying to intimidate us by suspending our MPs. What was their fault? They were trying to raise the issues which matter to people.”

    The Congress party will not be cowed down like this, he asserted. The MPs were holding placards raising the issues of rising prices of gas cylinders, imposition of GST on items such as flour and buttermilk. “We moved an adjournment motion demanding a discussion on these issues, but no discussion was held,” he said.

    Tagore, one of the suspended MPs, alleged that the government “only hears the voice of the fourth-richest man in the world and not the common man.”

    Later talking to reporters, Joshi said the government has been saying that it is “ready for discussion on price rise as soon as Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman recovers from Covid.”

    Joshi termed the conduct of suspended Congress MPs in the House “unacceptable” and said, “placing placards in front of the Lok Sabha Speaker chair is not the way to protest.” “They were doing this after being warned by the Speaker,” he said.

    Joshi, who had moved the motion to suspend these MPs, said he had personally told the Congress leaders of both LS and RS that the government was ready for discussion on price rise.

    “But the Congress MPs’ action in the House shows they don’t respect the chair and the house. The action taken against them is appropriate,” he said.

  • Two rebel Shiv Sena MPs, including Shinde’s son, meet Lok Sabha speaker Om Birla

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: Lok Sabha member Shrikant Shinde, the son of Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, met Speaker Om Birla on Tuesday amid a buzz about a split in the Shiv Sena Parliamentary Party.

    The meeting of Shrikant Shinde, the Lok Sabha member from Kalyan, and Hemant Patil, the Lok Sabha member from Hingoli, with Birla came a day after Shiv Sena leader Vinayak Raut gave a letter to the speaker, asking him not to entertain any representation from the rival faction. It was not immediately clear whether Shinde and Patil had submitted any representation to the speaker.

    At least 12 Lok Sabha members of the Shiv Sena are learnt to have been in touch with the Shinde faction and are keen to replace Raut, the current floor leader of the party, with Rahul Shewale.

    Raut, in his letter submitted to the speaker on Monday night, had made it clear that he was the “duly appointed” leader of the Shiv Sena Parliamentary Party and Rajan Vichare was the chief whip.

    NEW DELHI: Lok Sabha member Shrikant Shinde, the son of Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, met Speaker Om Birla on Tuesday amid a buzz about a split in the Shiv Sena Parliamentary Party.

    The meeting of Shrikant Shinde, the Lok Sabha member from Kalyan, and Hemant Patil, the Lok Sabha member from Hingoli, with Birla came a day after Shiv Sena leader Vinayak Raut gave a letter to the speaker, asking him not to entertain any representation from the rival faction. It was not immediately clear whether Shinde and Patil had submitted any representation to the speaker.

    At least 12 Lok Sabha members of the Shiv Sena are learnt to have been in touch with the Shinde faction and are keen to replace Raut, the current floor leader of the party, with Rahul Shewale.

    Raut, in his letter submitted to the speaker on Monday night, had made it clear that he was the “duly appointed” leader of the Shiv Sena Parliamentary Party and Rajan Vichare was the chief whip.

  • ‘Opposition trying to create issue where none exists’: BJP on row over unparliamentary words

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: The BJP took on the opposition, especially the Congress, over the issue of unparliamentary words on Thursday and said it is trying to create an issue where none exists.

    Opposition parties have slammed the government, saying the new list of unparliamentary words is meant to gag the criticism of the Centre’s functioning.

    Citing Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla’s remarks over the issue, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson Sambit Patra said the speaker has presented the facts and cleared all illusions created by the opposition.

    The speaker has clearly stated that no word has been banned and that certain words would be expunged on the basis of its context, he pointed out.

    Hitting out at the opposition, Patra said several political parties, including Congress, are trying to mislead the country and creating an issue where none exists.

    The opposition on Thursday went straight for the government’s jugular over the “gag order” on using certain words in Parliament, insisting indignantly every expression used by them to describe how the BJP was destroying India has now been declared unparliamentary.

    The clamour forced Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to step in to soothe frayed tempers by making it clear no word has been banned from use in Parliament but will be expunged on a contextual basis.

    Members are free to express their views while maintaining decorum of the House, he said.

    The opposition was brimming with anger after a new booklet by the Lok Sabha Secretariat said on Wednesday the use of terms like ‘jumlajeevi’, ‘baal buddhi’, ‘Covid spreader’, ‘Snoopgate’ and even commonly used words like ‘ashamed’, ‘abused, ‘betrayed’, ‘corrupt’, ‘drama’, ‘hypocrisy’ and ‘incompetent’ will henceforth be considered unparliamentary in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.

    Former Congress chief Rahul Gandhi derisively termed the compilation the “New Dictionary for New India”.

    “Words used in discussion and debates which correctly describe the PM’s handling of the government, now banned from being spoken.”

    “Example of an unparliamentary sentence: ‘Jumlajeevi Tanashah shed Crocodile Tears when his lies and incompetence were exposed’,” he said.

    An angry Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said, “All words used by the Opposition to describe the reality of Modi Sarkar now to be considered ‘unparliamentary’. What next Vishguru”.

    Trinamool Congress leader Derek O’Brien showed even greater belligerence, declaring he will use those words and dared the government to act against him.

    “Session begins in a few days. GAG ORDER ISSUED ON MPs.”

    “Now, we will not be allowed to use these basic words while delivering a speech in #Parliament : Ashamed. Abused. Betrayed. Corrupt. Hypocrisy. Incompetent. I will use all these words. Suspend me. Fighting for democracy,” the TMC leader said.

    As the political temperature soared, Speaker Om Birla hastened to address the issue.

    “No word has been banned. Members are free to express their views. No one can snatch that right, but it should be as per decorum of Parliament,” Birla told reporters.

    The Speaker rejected the criticism that the BJP-led government at the Centre was behind the selection of ‘unparliamentary’ words and asserted that legislatures are independent of any government and the executive cannot give instructions to Parliament.

    “It is a routine practice continuing since 1954,” he said referring to the release of the booklet that lists words and expressions deemed unparliamentary.

    The Speaker’s clarification, however, failed to cut ice with Congress.

    “Clarification from @ombirlakota about ‘unparliamentary’ words doesn’t mean much. In all discussions, media seems to have overlooked that they can’t report on these comments in their dispatches. Also, print media will have to think twice before using these words in their articles,” Jairam Ramesh said in a tweet.

    Birla said words chosen for expunging have been used by members of the ruling party as well as the opposition.

    Several words and expressions, even those used commonly, get routinely expunged during legislative proceedings if a member protests and the presiding officer finds them inapt in a particular context.

    Taking on those who have been criticising the booklet, Birla said they should have read the 1100-page dictionary comprising unparliamentary words.

    Had they read it they would not have spread misconception.

    The Lok Sabha Secretariat’s list of unparliamentary words also says some terms may not be deemed unparliamentary unless read in conjunction with the other expressions spoken during the parliamentary proceedings.

    The booklet says any aspersions made against the Chair in both the houses, in any language, shall be considered unparliamentary and expunged from the records of Parliament.

    Some officials also sought to smooth ruffled feathers, saying “it is not a suggestion or order”, as these terms have been already expunged by presiding officers of Parliament and state legislatures.

    They said the words were considered unparliamentary even when the Congress-led UPA was in power.

    Sources in Parliament said 62 new words have been added to the list during the last year and some of these may be under review.

    Government sources said the list is not a new suggestion, but merely a compilation of words already expunged in the Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha or state legislatures.

    It also contains words considered unparliamentary in parliaments of the Commonwealth countries, they said.

    “If certain words are found objectionable and not in consonance with decorum and dignity of Parliament, it is under the jurisdiction of the Chair of either houses to expunge those words,” a Lok Sabha source said.

    Government sources pointed out the word ‘abused’ was considered unparliamentary in the House of Representatives of Australia, while ‘childishness’ was frowned upon in Qubec’s National Assembly.

    They said the phrases ‘lollipops in the budget’ and ‘you have reached here telling a lie’ were expunged from the proceedings of the Punjab Assembly.

    Even a word as harmless as ‘asatya’ (untruth) was expunged from the records of the Rajasthan assembly in 2021.

    NEW DELHI: The BJP took on the opposition, especially the Congress, over the issue of unparliamentary words on Thursday and said it is trying to create an issue where none exists.

    Opposition parties have slammed the government, saying the new list of unparliamentary words is meant to gag the criticism of the Centre’s functioning.

    Citing Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla’s remarks over the issue, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson Sambit Patra said the speaker has presented the facts and cleared all illusions created by the opposition.

    The speaker has clearly stated that no word has been banned and that certain words would be expunged on the basis of its context, he pointed out.

    Hitting out at the opposition, Patra said several political parties, including Congress, are trying to mislead the country and creating an issue where none exists.

    The opposition on Thursday went straight for the government’s jugular over the “gag order” on using certain words in Parliament, insisting indignantly every expression used by them to describe how the BJP was destroying India has now been declared unparliamentary.

    The clamour forced Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to step in to soothe frayed tempers by making it clear no word has been banned from use in Parliament but will be expunged on a contextual basis.

    Members are free to express their views while maintaining decorum of the House, he said.

    The opposition was brimming with anger after a new booklet by the Lok Sabha Secretariat said on Wednesday the use of terms like ‘jumlajeevi’, ‘baal buddhi’, ‘Covid spreader’, ‘Snoopgate’ and even commonly used words like ‘ashamed’, ‘abused, ‘betrayed’, ‘corrupt’, ‘drama’, ‘hypocrisy’ and ‘incompetent’ will henceforth be considered unparliamentary in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.

    Former Congress chief Rahul Gandhi derisively termed the compilation the “New Dictionary for New India”.

    “Words used in discussion and debates which correctly describe the PM’s handling of the government, now banned from being spoken.”

    “Example of an unparliamentary sentence: ‘Jumlajeevi Tanashah shed Crocodile Tears when his lies and incompetence were exposed’,” he said.

    An angry Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said, “All words used by the Opposition to describe the reality of Modi Sarkar now to be considered ‘unparliamentary’. What next Vishguru”.

    Trinamool Congress leader Derek O’Brien showed even greater belligerence, declaring he will use those words and dared the government to act against him.

    “Session begins in a few days. GAG ORDER ISSUED ON MPs.”

    “Now, we will not be allowed to use these basic words while delivering a speech in #Parliament : Ashamed. Abused. Betrayed. Corrupt. Hypocrisy. Incompetent. I will use all these words. Suspend me. Fighting for democracy,” the TMC leader said.

    As the political temperature soared, Speaker Om Birla hastened to address the issue.

    “No word has been banned. Members are free to express their views. No one can snatch that right, but it should be as per decorum of Parliament,” Birla told reporters.

    The Speaker rejected the criticism that the BJP-led government at the Centre was behind the selection of ‘unparliamentary’ words and asserted that legislatures are independent of any government and the executive cannot give instructions to Parliament.

    “It is a routine practice continuing since 1954,” he said referring to the release of the booklet that lists words and expressions deemed unparliamentary.

    The Speaker’s clarification, however, failed to cut ice with Congress.

    “Clarification from @ombirlakota about ‘unparliamentary’ words doesn’t mean much. In all discussions, media seems to have overlooked that they can’t report on these comments in their dispatches. Also, print media will have to think twice before using these words in their articles,” Jairam Ramesh said in a tweet.

    Birla said words chosen for expunging have been used by members of the ruling party as well as the opposition.

    Several words and expressions, even those used commonly, get routinely expunged during legislative proceedings if a member protests and the presiding officer finds them inapt in a particular context.

    Taking on those who have been criticising the booklet, Birla said they should have read the 1100-page dictionary comprising unparliamentary words.

    Had they read it they would not have spread misconception.

    The Lok Sabha Secretariat’s list of unparliamentary words also says some terms may not be deemed unparliamentary unless read in conjunction with the other expressions spoken during the parliamentary proceedings.

    The booklet says any aspersions made against the Chair in both the houses, in any language, shall be considered unparliamentary and expunged from the records of Parliament.

    Some officials also sought to smooth ruffled feathers, saying “it is not a suggestion or order”, as these terms have been already expunged by presiding officers of Parliament and state legislatures.

    They said the words were considered unparliamentary even when the Congress-led UPA was in power.

    Sources in Parliament said 62 new words have been added to the list during the last year and some of these may be under review.

    Government sources said the list is not a new suggestion, but merely a compilation of words already expunged in the Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha or state legislatures.

    It also contains words considered unparliamentary in parliaments of the Commonwealth countries, they said.

    “If certain words are found objectionable and not in consonance with decorum and dignity of Parliament, it is under the jurisdiction of the Chair of either houses to expunge those words,” a Lok Sabha source said.

    Government sources pointed out the word ‘abused’ was considered unparliamentary in the House of Representatives of Australia, while ‘childishness’ was frowned upon in Qubec’s National Assembly.

    They said the phrases ‘lollipops in the budget’ and ‘you have reached here telling a lie’ were expunged from the proceedings of the Punjab Assembly.

    Even a word as harmless as ‘asatya’ (untruth) was expunged from the records of the Rajasthan assembly in 2021.

  • Karti Chidambaram writes to Lok Sabha Speaker over ‘breach of parliamentary privilege’ amid CBI raids

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: Congress MP Karti Chidamabaram on Friday wrote to Lok Speaker Speaker Om Birla alleging that during a raid CBI officers seized “highly confidential” personal notes and papers pertaining to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information and Technology of which he is a member, and sought redressal for what he said was a “breach of his parliamentary privilege”.

    In a letter to Birla, Karti Chidambaram also said that over the course of the past few years, his family and he himself have become targets of a “relentless campaign by the present government and its investigating agencies which are trying to silence our voices of dissent by foisting one fake case after another”.

    Such “targeted intimidation” of a member of the House amounts to a breach of privilege, the MP from Tamil Nadu’s Sivaganga constituency said.

    Karti Chidambaram’s letter to Birla comes amid his questioning by the CBI.

    He appeared before the CBI for the second day on Friday to answer queries related to allegations of bribe in issuance of visas to 263 Chinese workers in 2011 when his father P Chidambaram was the home minister, officials said.

    Earlier this month, CBI teams had conducted coordinated search operations at 10 locations in multiple cities in the country, including residences of the Chidambarams in Chennai and Delhi.

    “I am writing to you now because I have become the victim of a grossly illegal and patently unconstitutional action,” Karti Chidambaram said in his letter to Birla.

    “The Central Bureau of Investigation in the garb of conducting an investigation into an 11-year-old decision of the Government in which I have absolutely no involvement raided my residence in Delhi,” he said.

    In the course of this so-called raid, certain officers of the CBI seized my “highly confidential and sensitive personal notes and papers” pertaining to the Parliamentary Standing Committee for Information and Technology, Karti Chidambaram alleged.

    “Shockingly, even my draft notes and questions which I had intended to ask witnesses summoned to the Committee, were also seized,” he alleged.

    He claimed that his handwritten notes pertaining to the depositions made to the Committee by witnesses were also seized for reasons best known to the Agency.

    Karti Chidambaram alleged that these actions by the CBI, in so far as they relate to “interference with my duties as a Parliamentarian, amount to a direct assault upon democratic principles on which our Parliament is founded”.

    “I, therefore, urge you to take immediate cognizance of this issue, which is a brazen breach of my Parliamentary privilege,” he said in the letter.

  • Naidu, Birla discuss Covid-safe Budget Session

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: Rajya Sabha Chairman M Venkaiah Naidu and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Sunday discussed preparations for the Budget session of Parliament amid the surge in coronavirus cases.

    The session begins Monday with the address of President Ram Nath Kovind to members of both the Houses.

    During the meet, Birla suggested that members of both the Houses can be seated at different locations by name to avoid confusion, crowding, and inquiries. Naidu accepted the suggestion, parliamentary sources said.

    Due to Covid norms, the two Houses are meeting at different times. Members of the two Houses will be accommodated in chambers of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha as well as galleries to prevent crowding.

    To implement the sitting arrangement by name, parties have been approached to draw up a list of members who would be accommodated in various locations. Seats were allotted in chambers and galleries of both the Houses based on the strength of parties.

    ALSO READ: Budget expectations: Clarity on crypto taxation, hike in 80C limit, duty rationalisation on EVs

    Given the reduction in the time of sitting of both the Houses by one hour per sitting due to staggered timings, Naidu and Birla took stock of the time available for different items of business. They underscored the need for cooperation from all sections of both the Houses for effective utilisation of available time.

    While Rajya Sabha would meet from 10 am to 3 pm, the Lok Sabha would sit from 4 pm to 9 pm. Officials informed the two presiding officers that the Parliament House complex has been sanitised and all possible measures are being taken to contain the spread of coronavirus.

    They were told that all MPs have been requested to take RT-PCR test 48 before the commencement of the Session. Part one of the session would end on February 11. The second part would begin on March 14 and conclude on April 8.