Tag: Madrassa

  • NCPCR issues notice to UP govt over madrasa board’s rejection of its recommendations

    Express News Service

    LUCKNOW: The National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) commission served a notice to the UP government after the UP Madrassa Education Board (UPMEB) unanimously rejected the child rights body’s recommendation, on Wednesday, regarding the shifting non-muslim students from madrassas to other educational facilities.

    In the notice addressed to the special secretary, UP Minority Affairs and Waqf Department, NCPCR chairman Priyank Kanoongo said: “No compliance report has been submitted to the commission from the UP government on the recommendations shared on December 8, 2022, for non-Muslim students studying in madrassas.”

    The commission, on Dec 8, 2022, asked the government and recognized madrasas to hold an inquiry to find out how many non-Muslim students were enrolled in them so that they could be shifted to other educational institutions. The commission said it had received complaints from different sources about non-Muslim students attending government-funded or recognised madrasas.

    “This is a violation of Article 28(3) of the Constitution of India prohibiting educational institutions from obligating the children to take part in any religious instruction, without the consent of parents,” wrote NCPCR chairman to the UP government.

    Therefore, NCPCR recommended the UP government to conduct a detailed inquiry into all government-funded or recognized madrassas where non-Muslim children were receiving education. The commission also demanded physical verification of non-Muslim children attending madrassas and shift them to schools for formal education.

    On Wednesday, after a meeting of UPMEB chairman Iftikhar Ahmed Javed announced that the Board had unanimously rejected NCPCR recommendations as there could be no differentiation on the basis of the religious faith of the students.

    Taking objection to the UPMEB’s stand, Kanoongo, on Friday, wrote to the state government, saying “Madrassa board chairperson’s comment violates the constitutional rights of the children and it disrespects the commission’s mandate.”

    Kanoongo sought a compliance report over the commission’s notice within the next three days.

    Meanwhile speaking to the media, the UPMEB chairman said that he stood by the Board’s decision reiterating that there would not be a differentiation among the children on the basis of their religious faith.

    “If NCPCR head has any evidence of forced religious conversion of any student or forceful admission of non-Muslim students in madrassa, then he must share input and lodge FIR,” Javed said while raising his objection on the NCPCR’s notice.

    LUCKNOW: The National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) commission served a notice to the UP government after the UP Madrassa Education Board (UPMEB) unanimously rejected the child rights body’s recommendation, on Wednesday, regarding the shifting non-muslim students from madrassas to other educational facilities.

    In the notice addressed to the special secretary, UP Minority Affairs and Waqf Department, NCPCR chairman Priyank Kanoongo said: “No compliance report has been submitted to the commission from the UP government on the recommendations shared on December 8, 2022, for non-Muslim students studying in madrassas.”

    The commission, on Dec 8, 2022, asked the government and recognized madrasas to hold an inquiry to find out how many non-Muslim students were enrolled in them so that they could be shifted to other educational institutions. The commission said it had received complaints from different sources about non-Muslim students attending government-funded or recognised madrasas.

    “This is a violation of Article 28(3) of the Constitution of India prohibiting educational institutions from obligating the children to take part in any religious instruction, without the consent of parents,” wrote NCPCR chairman to the UP government.

    Therefore, NCPCR recommended the UP government to conduct a detailed inquiry into all government-funded or recognized madrassas where non-Muslim children were receiving education. The commission also demanded physical verification of non-Muslim children attending madrassas and shift them to schools for formal education.

    On Wednesday, after a meeting of UPMEB chairman Iftikhar Ahmed Javed announced that the Board had unanimously rejected NCPCR recommendations as there could be no differentiation on the basis of the religious faith of the students.

    Taking objection to the UPMEB’s stand, Kanoongo, on Friday, wrote to the state government, saying “Madrassa board chairperson’s comment violates the constitutional rights of the children and it disrespects the commission’s mandate.”

    Kanoongo sought a compliance report over the commission’s notice within the next three days.

    Meanwhile speaking to the media, the UPMEB chairman said that he stood by the Board’s decision reiterating that there would not be a differentiation among the children on the basis of their religious faith.

    “If NCPCR head has any evidence of forced religious conversion of any student or forceful admission of non-Muslim students in madrassa, then he must share input and lodge FIR,” Javed said while raising his objection on the NCPCR’s notice.

  • AIMPLB alleges bias against madrassas in BJP-ruled states

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has expressed concern over the alleged targeting of madrassas by the BJP-led central and state governments and asked why same rules do not apply for other religious institutions such as mutts, gurukuls and dharmshalas.

    In a statement, AIMPLB general secretary Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani alleged that the governments of a party, which is influenced by the RSS, at the Centre and in some states were having a negative approach towards minorities, especially the Muslim community.

    “When a party influenced by a certain thought comes to power, it is expected that its approach will be unbiased and within the frame of our Constitution,” he said.

    Rahmani said Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself has spoken in parliament and other places about the importance of law and order but various state governments where the BJP is in power, their attitude is the opposite.

    “The way in which BJP governments in Assam and UP have been after the madrassas over very small violations and are targeting the madrassas by closing, bulldozing them and even harassing people working in the madrasas and masjids by alleging that they were terrorists without any reason,” he said, according to a statement issued on Thursday.

    Also, prominent people coming from outside the country have to face bans and restrictions, which is a gross violation of the Constitution, he said.

    “If bulldozing buildings is the only option for any violation then why don’t they take a similar approach for gurukuls, mutts and dharmshalas as they do in the case of madrassas and mosques,” Rahmani asked.

    It seems that the government is doing things at its own will and not following what is written in the Constitution, he alleged.

    The Muslim Personal Law Board condemns such a biased approach and requests governments to follow what is written in the Constitution and practise it with patience, he added.

    The statement came after the Uttar Pradesh government on Wednesday announced a survey of unrecognised madrassas in the state to gather information about the number of teachers, curriculum, and basic facilities available there, among others.

    Meanwhile, the Assam government’s ongoing drive to demolish madrassas for their connection to alleged “‘jihadi activities” has drawn sharp criticism from the Opposition, which has termed the exercise as “totally illegal” and targeted at “one partcular community”.

    Three madrassas have been demolished by the BJP government within the last one month in different parts of the state after arresting their teachers, who were found to be allegedly involved in “jihadi” activities.

    However, on each occasion the official reason for bringing down the structures are related to faulty construction or violation of land norms instead of any link with jihadi activities.

    It is only the political leaders from the ruling dispensation who usually give statements in the media that the madrassas have been demolished for allegedly carrying out jihadi activities from their premises.

    The administration bulldozed madrassas at Moirabari in Morigaon district on August 4, at Dhakaliapara in Barpeta on August 29 and at Jogighopa in Bongaigaon on August 31.

    “The Moirabari madrassa was demolished after a notice was sent to it saying that the building was small and the electricity connection was illegal. The one at Dhakaliapara one was demolished as it was on government land,” All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya secretary Abdul Kadir told PTI.

    The two-storeyed residential madrassa at Jogighopa was razed to the ground for violating disaster norms and the authorities asked the boarders to vacate the premises at 10 pm the previous night, he claimed.

    “We have been cooperating with the law enforcing agencies if someone is found doing something wrong. But that does not mean that the entire institution is at fault. What is the point in demolishing an educational centre?” asked Kadir.

    From April 1 last year, 610 state-run madrassas in Assam were converted into upper primary, high and higher secondary schools with no change of status, pay, allowances and service conditions for the teaching and non-teaching staff.

    Following it, the State Madrassa Education Board, Assam was dissolved and the last Assam High Madrassa examination by the Board of Secondary Education, Assam (SEBA) for Class 10 students took place in 2022.

    At present, there are about 1,000 private madrassas, which are run according to the guidelines and syllabus of the All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya (AATMQ).

    AATMQ offers general courses till class eight and theology thereafter.

    From this year those wishing to study general courses for classes 9 and 10 in madrassas will be able to appear for the exams under an open schooling system with its support.

    Meanwhile, a senior official of the SEBA said that about 10 private madrassas have approached it for converting those into general schools, which was done after following the due process.

    Opposition senior Congress leader Rakibul Hussain hit out at the Himanta Biswa Sarma government for the demolitions, “It is unconstitutional to destroy the madrassas.

    The chief minister said that the suspected jihadis entered Assam or started their activities within the last three year. If so, then only the BJP has to be blamed as they are in power since 2016.”

    He also alleged that Sarma is making contradictory statements as he had praised the madrassas as centres of spiritualism during his days in the Congress, but is now blaming them for anti-social activities.

    Opposition All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) said that the Assam government is “totally wrong” in bulldozing the educational centres on the pretext of curbing jihadi activities.

    “If there were something wrong, then rectify those. After all these madrassas are imparting education. Demolishing the madrassas is an expression of hatred against one particular community,” AIUDF MLA Ashraful Hussain said.

    He also said that Assam state Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, headed by AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal, and AATMQ are considering approaching the court against the demolition of the madrassas.

    CPI(M) state secretary Suprakash Talukdar said the party is totally against the demolition of madrassas as arresting a suspect is not the final step of the justice delivery system.

    “The government is breaking all laws. Who is responsible for demolishing a centre of education? Who will pay for its costs? These are usually constructed with public donations,” he said.

    “The government has become more intolerant. We have also seen a lot of cases against the alleged jihadi elements. But what is the fate of those cases? Were those accused convicted?” he asked.

    More than 40 people with suspected links to jihadi elements, including Bangladeshi nationals, have been arrested in the state since March this year.

    NEW DELHI: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has expressed concern over the alleged targeting of madrassas by the BJP-led central and state governments and asked why same rules do not apply for other religious institutions such as mutts, gurukuls and dharmshalas.

    In a statement, AIMPLB general secretary Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani alleged that the governments of a party, which is influenced by the RSS, at the Centre and in some states were having a negative approach towards minorities, especially the Muslim community.

    “When a party influenced by a certain thought comes to power, it is expected that its approach will be unbiased and within the frame of our Constitution,” he said.

    Rahmani said Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself has spoken in parliament and other places about the importance of law and order but various state governments where the BJP is in power, their attitude is the opposite.

    “The way in which BJP governments in Assam and UP have been after the madrassas over very small violations and are targeting the madrassas by closing, bulldozing them and even harassing people working in the madrasas and masjids by alleging that they were terrorists without any reason,” he said, according to a statement issued on Thursday.

    Also, prominent people coming from outside the country have to face bans and restrictions, which is a gross violation of the Constitution, he said.

    “If bulldozing buildings is the only option for any violation then why don’t they take a similar approach for gurukuls, mutts and dharmshalas as they do in the case of madrassas and mosques,” Rahmani asked.

    It seems that the government is doing things at its own will and not following what is written in the Constitution, he alleged.

    The Muslim Personal Law Board condemns such a biased approach and requests governments to follow what is written in the Constitution and practise it with patience, he added.

    The statement came after the Uttar Pradesh government on Wednesday announced a survey of unrecognised madrassas in the state to gather information about the number of teachers, curriculum, and basic facilities available there, among others.

    Meanwhile, the Assam government’s ongoing drive to demolish madrassas for their connection to alleged “‘jihadi activities” has drawn sharp criticism from the Opposition, which has termed the exercise as “totally illegal” and targeted at “one partcular community”.

    Three madrassas have been demolished by the BJP government within the last one month in different parts of the state after arresting their teachers, who were found to be allegedly involved in “jihadi” activities.

    However, on each occasion the official reason for bringing down the structures are related to faulty construction or violation of land norms instead of any link with jihadi activities.

    It is only the political leaders from the ruling dispensation who usually give statements in the media that the madrassas have been demolished for allegedly carrying out jihadi activities from their premises.

    The administration bulldozed madrassas at Moirabari in Morigaon district on August 4, at Dhakaliapara in Barpeta on August 29 and at Jogighopa in Bongaigaon on August 31.

    “The Moirabari madrassa was demolished after a notice was sent to it saying that the building was small and the electricity connection was illegal. The one at Dhakaliapara one was demolished as it was on government land,” All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya secretary Abdul Kadir told PTI.

    The two-storeyed residential madrassa at Jogighopa was razed to the ground for violating disaster norms and the authorities asked the boarders to vacate the premises at 10 pm the previous night, he claimed.

    “We have been cooperating with the law enforcing agencies if someone is found doing something wrong. But that does not mean that the entire institution is at fault. What is the point in demolishing an educational centre?” asked Kadir.

    From April 1 last year, 610 state-run madrassas in Assam were converted into upper primary, high and higher secondary schools with no change of status, pay, allowances and service conditions for the teaching and non-teaching staff.

    Following it, the State Madrassa Education Board, Assam was dissolved and the last Assam High Madrassa examination by the Board of Secondary Education, Assam (SEBA) for Class 10 students took place in 2022.

    At present, there are about 1,000 private madrassas, which are run according to the guidelines and syllabus of the All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya (AATMQ).

    AATMQ offers general courses till class eight and theology thereafter.

    From this year those wishing to study general courses for classes 9 and 10 in madrassas will be able to appear for the exams under an open schooling system with its support.

    Meanwhile, a senior official of the SEBA said that about 10 private madrassas have approached it for converting those into general schools, which was done after following the due process.

    Opposition senior Congress leader Rakibul Hussain hit out at the Himanta Biswa Sarma government for the demolitions, “It is unconstitutional to destroy the madrassas.

    The chief minister said that the suspected jihadis entered Assam or started their activities within the last three year. If so, then only the BJP has to be blamed as they are in power since 2016.”

    He also alleged that Sarma is making contradictory statements as he had praised the madrassas as centres of spiritualism during his days in the Congress, but is now blaming them for anti-social activities.

    Opposition All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) said that the Assam government is “totally wrong” in bulldozing the educational centres on the pretext of curbing jihadi activities.

    “If there were something wrong, then rectify those. After all these madrassas are imparting education. Demolishing the madrassas is an expression of hatred against one particular community,” AIUDF MLA Ashraful Hussain said.

    He also said that Assam state Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, headed by AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal, and AATMQ are considering approaching the court against the demolition of the madrassas.

    CPI(M) state secretary Suprakash Talukdar said the party is totally against the demolition of madrassas as arresting a suspect is not the final step of the justice delivery system.

    “The government is breaking all laws. Who is responsible for demolishing a centre of education? Who will pay for its costs? These are usually constructed with public donations,” he said.

    “The government has become more intolerant. We have also seen a lot of cases against the alleged jihadi elements. But what is the fate of those cases? Were those accused convicted?” he asked.

    More than 40 people with suspected links to jihadi elements, including Bangladeshi nationals, have been arrested in the state since March this year.

  • After national anthem sung across UP madrassas, MP, Haryana mull similar move

    By PTI

    CHANDIGARH: Haryana may make singing the national anthem mandatory in all madrassas in the state, Education Minister Kanwar Pal indicated here on Friday, a day after neighbouring Uttar Pradesh made it compulsory.

    “There is no harm. The national anthem should be sung everywhere, be it a madrassa or a school. Nobody should have any objection,” the minister said when asked by reporters to comment on the UP government’s move and if Haryana was contemplating a similar step.

    Singing of the national anthem has been made compulsory at all madrassas in Uttar Pradesh starting Thursday.

    The Registrar of the Uttar Pradesh Madrassa Education Board issued an order to this effect to all the District Minority Welfare Officers on May 9.

    Kanwar Pal was also asked to comment on Congress leader Randeep Singh Surjewala demanding on Wednesday that the Haryana government withdraw a new Class 9 history book that mentions the Congress’ “policy of appeasement” as one of the reasons for the country’s Partition in 1947.

    “You cannot make history sugar-coated. When the book gives credit to Congress on many things, mistakes will also be highlighted. Accepting partition of the country was a mistake and that will find a mention,” he said.

    Responding to a question, the education minister said lessons on freedom fighter and Hindutva ideologue Veer Savarkar were being taught in schools earlier and that will continue.

    Young generation is being given correct information about history, he said.

    He said great men in their own way contributed significantly to liberate the country from the British.

    “These are the events that happened in history and the younger generation is being made aware of them,” he said.

    Meanwhile, he also said there is a lot of enthusiasm among the people regarding the Pragati Rally to be organised in Yamunanagar on May 15.

    He said Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar will dedicate development projects worth crores of rupees to the public in this rally.

    Meanwhile, with singing of national anthem made compulsory in all madrassas in neighbouring Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh Home Minister Narottam Mishra on Friday said a similar step could be considered in the state.

    He made the statement in response to a query asked by reporters here.

    Speaking separately, Madhya Pradesh BJP chief Vishnu Dutt Sharma said ‘Jana Gana Mana’ should be recited in all educational institutions across the country.

    Singing of national anthem “Jana Gana Mana” has been made compulsory at all madrassas in Uttar Pradesh starting Thursday.

    The Registrar of the Uttar Pradesh Madrassa Education Board issued an order to this effect to all the District Minority Welfare Officers on May 9.

    Talking to reporters, minister Mishra said the national anthem should be sung everywhere.

    “It is a good thing. It is a national anthem and it can be sung everywhere,” he said.

    When asked whether a similar decision could be implemented in MP, Mishra said, “It is matter of consideration. It can be considered.”

    Replying to a query whether the national anthem should be sung in madrassas in Madhya Pradesh as well, state BJP president Sharma said, “We are not asking anyone to sing the national anthem in Pakistan.

    We are just asking for educational institutions situated in Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and all corners of the country to sing the national anthem and national song and slogans of ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’.”

    “If such a thing is happening and such a decision has been taken, then it is a welcome step,” he said.

    The national anthem was sung in madrassas across the state on Friday after it was made mandatory by the Uttar Pradesh government, according to reports.

    Though the decision came into effect from Thursday, most madrassas in the state had remained closed due to low attendance of children on the first day of classes after the end of Ramzan holidays.

    Friday is a holiday in most of the madrassas, but in those that were open, ‘Jana Gana Mana’ was sung as part of the morning prayers, the reports said.

    “The government wants the students of madrassas to remember that legacy forever. When they sing the national anthem in the morning, the nation will be strengthened,” the state’s Minister of State for Minority Welfare Danish Azad Ansari told PTI.

    “Its purpose is to further promote the feeling of patriotism among the children studying in madrasas,” he said, adding that madrassas played an important role in the country’s Independence.

    According to reports received from the Muslim-dominated Saharanpur district, minority welfare officer Bharat Lal Gond said all the students and teachers in the madrassas that were opened sang the national anthem “with enthusiasm”.

    In Badaun, ‘Jana Gana Mana’ was sung during the morning prayers, and teachers explained the national anthem’s importance to the children.

    Rashid Khan, director of Madrassa Hikmat Khan, said the national anthem has already been sung in madrassas on Independence Day, Republic Day and Gandhi Jayanti.

    “This country belongs to all and the national anthem is a symbol of the country’s honour. There is no objection by any madrassa in singing it. They have always respected the national anthem,” Khan said.

    Gorakhpur district minority welfare officer Ashutosh Pandey said most of the 243 madrassas sang the national anthem along with the traditional prayers in the morning.

    Diwan Sahab Zaman Khan, General Secretary of Teachers’ Association Madaris Arabia, said Hamd (praises to Allah) and Salam (salutations to Muhammad) used to be recited before the start of classes in madrassas until now.

    “In some places, the national anthem was also sung but it was not compulsory. Now it is.”

    After the singing of the national anthem was made compulsory at all madrassas in the state from Thursday, Registrar of the Uttar Pradesh Madrassa Education Board, SN Pandey, had issued an order to all the district minority welfare officers in this connection on May 9.

    At present, there are 16,461 madrassas in Uttar Pradesh, out of which 560 receive grants from the government.

  • Gauhati HC upholds Assam’s new madrassa law

    By Express News Service

    GUWAHATI: The Gauhati High Court on Friday upheld the Assam Repealing Act of 2020 that repealed the Madrassa Education Provincialisation Act.

    The state assembly had in 2020 passed the Assam Repealing Act of 2020 to convert the state-funded Madrassas into general schools.

    Dismissing a writ petition, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Soumitra Saikia said the claim of the 13 petitioners that the state-funded Madrassas are minority institutions and were established and administered by the minority had no foundation and as such, unacceptable.

    “The Madrasas in question, which are wholly maintained out of State funds, cannot impart religious instructions in terms of the mandate of Article 28(1) of the Constitution of India,” the court observed.

    Advocate General Debajit Saikia had submitted to the court that the changes effected by the state government affected only the state-funded provincialised Madrasas. He had argued that the new law had no bearing on the functioning of the “Community Madrasas”, “Qawmi Madrasas” or “Maktabs”.

    Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma hailed the court’s judgement.

    “Division Bench of Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in a landmark judgment delivered today upheld the Act of 2020 to repeal Madrassa Education Provincialisation Acts and also upheld all other notifications to convert 397 provincialised madrassas to general educational institutions,” he tweeted.