Tag: Harvey Weinstein sexual assault rape

  • Judge rejects sex assault count against Harvey Weinstein

    By Associated Press

    LOS ANGELES: A Los Angeles judge on Thursday, August 12, 2021, again rejected one of 11 sexual assault counts in an indictment of Harvey Weinstein. Judge Lisa B. Lench first dismissed the count of sexual battery by restraint as too old and outside the statute of limitations two weeks ago, but allowed the district attorney’s office to amend the allegation against the 69-year-old former movie mogul and convicted rapist. On Thursday, she found that neither of two attempts at an amended complaint from prosecutors solved the problem, and rejected the count again. 

    ALSO READ: Harvey Weinstein’s one sexual assault count dismissed, for nowWeinstein attended the hearing in LA County jail attire. He was brought into the courtroom shackled to a wheelchair, and was uncuffed as the proceedings began. Lench gave prosecutors a glimmer of hope on the dismissed count, saying that if they reconvene the grand jury and get it to return a new indictment for it, she may accept it. But she offered no specific instructions. “I can’t tell you what to do,” the judge said. The rejected count dates to May 2010. Weinstein was first charged with it in January 2020, before the statute of limitations had expired. Prosecutors then got an indictment from a grand jury on an identical count six months later, when the time had lapsed. The judge agreed with Weinstein attorney Alan Jackson that the grand jury indictment was a new prosecution, and therefore was coming too late. “The people are grasping to try to save something that is unsalvageable,” Jackson said in court. “They did it, they blew it, they can’t fix it.” Prosecutors argued that it was a continuation of the same case. While the count is a small part of the case, dismissing it removes one of five accusers from Weinstein’s forthcoming trial. Still intact are four counts of rape and six other sexual assault counts. Weinstein pleaded not guilty to all of them last month in his first court appearance in the California case. He was extradited from New York, where he is serving a 23-year sentence for convictions of rape and sexual assault. Other charges against Weinstein are for even older incidents, but different statutes apply to them. The defense also revealed at the hearing that they have been given a list of 248 witnesses for the forthcoming trial, for which no date has been set. Weinstein’s attorneys will seek to reject many of them, and more technical fights are likely to come as they attempt to erode the case against him. “Today’s a great example of why we need judges with a backbone,” Weinstein attorney Mark Werksman said outside court, “and juries with a tough spine to stand up against false accusations.” 

  • Harvey Weinstein: One sexual assault count dismissed, for now

    By Associated Press
    LOS ANGELES: A Los Angeles judge on Thursday, July 29, 2021, dismissed one of 11 sexual assault counts against Harvey Weinstein, giving the former movie mogul and convicted rapist a minor and possibly temporary victory. At a hearing with the 69-year-old Weinstein in the courtroom, Judge Lisa B. Lench agreed with his defence attorneys that a count alleging sexual battery by restraint in May of 2010 was too old, and outside the statute of limitations. But she gave the prosecution permission to refile the charge in a way that may be allowable, setting up an ongoing fight. Weinstein pleaded not guilty to four counts of rape and seven other sexual assault counts last week in his first court appearance in the California case. He was extradited from New York, where he is serving a 23-year sentence for convictions of rape and sexual assault. In Los Angeles, Weinstein was first charged with the now-dismissed count in January of 2020, before the statute of limitations had expired. Prosecutors then got an indictment from a grand jury on an identical count six months later, when the time had lapsed. Weinstein’s lawyers successfully argued at Thursday’s hearing that the grand jury indictment counted as a new case, making the charge “fatally flawed.””No one forced the prosecution to go to the grand jury,” Weinstein attorney Alan Jackson said in court. “They chose to enter a new case.” Prosecutors argued that it was a continuation of the same case and should be considered what’s often called a superseding indictment. Other charges against Weinstein are for even older incidents, but different statutes apply to them. Outside court, the defense touted the ruling as a significant victory, pointing out that it removes one of the five women involved in the 11 counts. “Twenty per cent of the district attorneys case has just been thrown out,” Weinstein attorney Mark Werksman said.None of the women has been identified. The judge sided with the prosecution on two other counts that she refused to dismiss, rejecting defense arguments those incidents were also too old. No trial date has been set for Weinstein. More technical fights are likely to come before it begins as his lawyers seek to erode the case against him. They have said the charges are all baseless, old and uncorroborated. Weinstein was brought into court in a wheelchair wearing brown county jail attire. A bailiff unshackled him from the chair and put him next to his attorneys. The lawyers argued that Weinstein should be allowed to change into a suit for this and similar proceedings, a move that’s standard for a jury trial but less common for pre-trial hearings. Werksman called the jail clothes a “mark of Cain” that branded his client a criminal in photos and video from the courtroom. The judge rejected the argument, suggesting the garb wasn’t so bad.”Mr. Weinstein is wearing a brown top,” Lench said. “You know it’s jail attire, but I’m not sure everybody knows it’s jail attire.”  

  • Harvey Weinstein: 1 sexual assault count dismissed, for now

    By Associated Press
    LOS ANGELES: A Los Angeles judge on Thursday, July 29, 2021, dismissed one of 11 sexual assault counts against Harvey Weinstein, giving the former movie mogul and convicted rapist a minor and possibly temporary victory. At a hearing with the 69-year-old Weinstein in the courtroom, Judge Lisa B. Lench agreed with his defence attorneys that a count alleging sexual battery by restraint in May of 2010 was too old, and outside the statute of limitations. But she gave the prosecution permission to refile the charge in a way that may be allowable, setting up an ongoing fight. Weinstein pleaded not guilty to four counts of rape and seven other sexual assault counts last week in his first court appearance in the California case. He was extradited from New York, where he is serving a 23-year sentence for convictions of rape and sexual assault. In Los Angeles, Weinstein was first charged with the now-dismissed count in January of 2020, before the statute of limitations had expired. Prosecutors then got an indictment from a grand jury on an identical count six months later, when the time had lapsed. Weinstein’s lawyers successfully argued at Thursday’s hearing that the grand jury indictment counted as a new case, making the charge “fatally flawed.””No one forced the prosecution to go to the grand jury,” Weinstein attorney Alan Jackson said in court. “They chose to enter a new case.” Prosecutors argued that it was a continuation of the same case and should be considered what’s often called a superseding indictment. Other charges against Weinstein are for even older incidents, but different statutes apply to them. Outside court, the defense touted the ruling as a significant victory, pointing out that it removes one of the five women involved in the 11 counts. “Twenty per cent of the district attorneys case has just been thrown out,” Weinstein attorney Mark Werksman said.None of the women has been identified. The judge sided with the prosecution on two other counts that she refused to dismiss, rejecting defense arguments those incidents were also too old. No trial date has been set for Weinstein. More technical fights are likely to come before it begins as his lawyers seek to erode the case against him. They have said the charges are all baseless, old and uncorroborated. Weinstein was brought into court in a wheelchair wearing brown county jail attire. A bailiff unshackled him from the chair and put him next to his attorneys. The lawyers argued that Weinstein should be allowed to change into a suit for this and similar proceedings, a move that’s standard for a jury trial but less common for pre-trial hearings. Werksman called the jail clothes a “mark of Cain” that branded his client a criminal in photos and video from the courtroom. The judge rejected the argument, suggesting the garb wasn’t so bad.”Mr. Weinstein is wearing a brown top,” Lench said. “You know it’s jail attire, but I’m not sure everybody knows it’s jail attire.”