Tag: Delhi University

  • Fresh demand for immediate release of ex-DU professor Saibaba on medical grounds

    By PTI
    NEW DELHI: A committee comprising prominent personalities from different fields on Wednesday sought immediate release of former Delhi University professor G N Saibaba, who is serving a life term in Nagpur Central Prison for alleged Maoist links, on medical grounds.

    Saibaba, who is wheelchair-bound with over 90 per cent physical disability, had tested positive for COVID-19 on February 12.

    Addressing a press conference, the Committee for Defence and Release of G N Saibaba said his condition has deteriorated since then with his blood pressure dropping to “dangerous levels” over the last two weeks.

    “Our demands are that G N Saibaba should be released from Nagpur Central Jail immediately and that he should be administered treatment appropriate to all his medical problems with urgency,” committee member and DU professor Nandita Narayan said.

    The committee, which also comprises lawyer Prashant Bhushan, writer Arundhati Roy, CPI general secretary D Raja, also noted that Saibaba has been suffering from cold, fever, throat infection, body ache, joint pain, shortness of breath, headaches and muscle spasms, but has been “left to recover with only simple antibiotics, instead of a thorough medical check-up”.

    Filmmaker Sanjay Kak and DU professor Vikas Gupta are also part of the committee.

    Roy said what the country is currently witnessing is “not politics, but pathology”, and that every individual speaking against the government risks incarceration.

    “There’s something psychotic going on. Today, we are in the business of cultivating a mythological character called Narendra Modi who is trying to become a godman, who is trying to disappear all traces of his real life, of his college degrees.”

    “This nation is being hypnotised in some way. We can’t let it happen. We have to understand that all the best activists, the best lawyers are in jail. Whoever speaks for Saibaba and everyone else is next in line. We are up against an existential battle, a pathological battle,” she said.

    CPI general secretary D Raja said his party had been demanding Saibaba’s release since the first tenure of the NDA government when Rajnath Singh was the home minister, but the requests have failed to yield favourable results on account of the “grave charges” against the professor.

    The CPI leader said Saibaba’s treatment by the government was in violation of his right to adequate medical care, particularly as a disabled person.

    “I have come to the conclusion that political parties who believe in democracy, who believe in the Constitution, and social movements must come together, and there should be a countrywide popular movement for the release of professor Saibaba,” he said.

    Lawyer Prashant Bhushan claimed that one of the major reasons why Saibaba was incarcerated was because he was “relentlessly raising questions about the actions and policies of the government”.

    “This has been one of the USPs of this regime that it has relentlessly gone after human rights activists, particularly the people who question the politics of this government. They have gone after dissenting journalists who have written against the government and the method of doing that is to arrest them by making up any kind of charges,” he said.

    Bhushan termed the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), the stringent law under which Saibaba has been booked, “totally draconian”.

    “In my view, the provision for bail in that law is totally unconstitutional, as is the definition of unlawful activity which is partly borrowed from the law of sedition,” he said.

    Bhushan alleged that people in the country are being “falsely” implicated because the police officers who are doing that “at the behest of the political government are not being held accountable”.

    Muralidharan, general secretary, National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled (NPRD), alleged denying bail and proper medical treatment to Saibaba amounts to “torture, cruelty and indignity”.

    As per the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which India is a signatory to, as per other international conventions and also the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, “all this constitutes torture”, he said.

    “What we have been demanding is that implement laws that are there in the country, implement the convention we are signatories to. We are not demanding anything beyond that,” he said.

    In March 2017, a Gadchiroli sessions court sentenced Saibaba and four others, including a journalist and a JNU student, to life imprisonment for Maoist links and indulging in activities amounting to waging war against the country under provisions of the UAPA.

  • Delhi University reopens central library for research scholars, faculty members

    By PTI
    NEW DELHI: As part of its phased reopening, Delhi University will allow research scholars and faculty members to use the central library and its reading rooms.

    In a notification issued on Thursday, the university announced that the library will be reopened to research scholars and teachers with immediate effect while maintaining UGC and Delhi University Library System (DULS) specific guidelines.

    “Library facilities under DULS will be made operational in phases. In first phase only bona-fide faculty members, Ph.D/M. Phil scholars will be allowed to use library reading room facilities. The reading room facilities would be limited to 10 AM to 4 PM during the week days i.e.Monday to Friday,” the notification read.

    All the reading rooms on research floor and three rooms on the ground floor will be available for visitors.

    However, they will have to take permission through an email to the librarian before visiting the library.

    The library will also allow its members to borrow and return books and no “late return fine” would be charged for the period of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    While it advised the staff handling books to wear gloves, visitors have also been instructed to carry gloves and hand sanitiser and maintain social distancing.

    “The user/staff who does not adhere to the guidelines would face disciplinary action like cancellation of membership etc,” it said.

    Delhi University had announced reopening its campus and colleges from February 1 for final-year students who require access to facilities for practical purposes.

    Schools, colleges and universities across the country were closed in March last year in a bid to contain the spread of COVID-19.

  • HC asks Delhi University to provide timeline for results, mark sheets, holding convocation

    By PTI
    NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi University (DU) to provide a timeline for declaration of results, issuance of mark sheets and holding convocation on an annual basis for students.

    The high court said DU shall file a comprehensive affidavit providing the timeline and procedure regarding these issues so that students are not inconvenienced every semester and are not forced to approach the court for obtaining their transcripts, mark sheets and degree certificates, as was done in this matter.

    “This court is of the opinion that in order to ensure that there is a comprehensive, streamlined procedure for declaration of results, issuance of transcripts, mark sheets and degree certificates, etc. DU ought to have a prescribed timeline,” Justice M Prathiba Singh said.

    The high court said the earlier affidavit filed by the university was not satisfactory as no specific timelines have been given for the issuance of digital degree certificates and for transmission of data to Digilocker and the affidavit was “quite cryptic”.

    The court was hearing a batch of petitions by doctors, former DU students, seeking direction for issuance of degree certificates on an urgent basis to enable them to pursue higher education.

    It asked the university to provide a timeline for declaration of results after conclusion of the last exam in a particular semester for under-graduate and post-graduate courses, for issuance of mark sheets/ transcripts or making them available online after the results.

    The high court further asked it to provide the timeline for issuance of digital transcripts for such students who may require the same for further education or for employment and for transmission of data relating to mark sheets/ transcripts to Digilocker after the same has been announced by DU.

    “Timeline for issuance of provisional degree certificates or advance degree certificates after declaration of results, timeline for holding the convocation on an annual basis, timeline for issuance of actual degrees both in digital form and paper degrees and for transmission of the digital degrees/ paper degrees to Digilocker,” it said.

    The high court asked the university to file the affidavit within six weeks and listed the matter for further hearing on February 17.

    Earlier, the high court had directed the DU to issue within seven working days digital degree certificates to students who have already graduated and urgently require the document for taking admission in a foreign university or for employment.

    It had passed the order on a bunch of petitions, putting in place a proper procedure for issuance of degree certificates through an online mechanism to ensure that delay in printing of degree certificates does not become an impediment to students who need it and to dispense with the need for physical presence of students at the university during the COVID-19 pandemic.