Tag: BJP

  • Fear, loathing and emergence of new minority politics in poll-bound Assam

    Express News Service
    KOKRAJHAR/DHUBRI: Sitting inside his dirtcoated, poorly-stocked provision store next to a rural road at Joypur village in Assam’s Kokrajhar district, Akbar Ahmed is reticent about the ongoing state elections. “I am so busy in my shop that I have had no time to think of it. Let voting day come then I will apply my mind,” he said as cacophonic traffic-blowing gas horns raced past, kicking up plumes of cough-inducing dust. A little later he dropped guard a tad, saying in the 2016 Assembly elections he had voted for the Bodoland People’s Front, then an alliance partner of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Ali-ur-Zaman in Kaziranga is similarly circumspect.

    Originally from Bongaigaon district in eastern Assam, he and his wife have been running a dhaba for the past four years on the national highway that cuts through the rhino sanctuary. “I will see, I can’t say anything about voting right now,” he answered in one-liners, suspicious of every question and refusing to even make eye contact. His wife hemmed and hawed in greater measure: “We are confused.” About 350 kms away inside a weather-beaten, tin-roofed tea stall in Bagbari village, Dhubri district, Noor Islam is watching a video on his mobile of the arrest of civil rights activist turned- candidate Akhil Gogoi.

    ALSO READ: Thumbs up for delivering development in Assam, but a big no for price rise

    Unlike Akbar and Zaman, Islam is not fearful of discussing the elections with a stranger. He declares his support for the Raijor Dal, Gogoi’s new political party, and spews venom on the BJP and its local candidate, Ashok Kumar Singhi. The tea shop owner, Usman Moni, in between blowing out betel nut from his paan-stained mouth and teeth every 15 minutes, is also vocal about the polls, the BJP and Singhi, describing the saffron party’s nominee as “Hitlerian”. It’s not difficult to understand why the Muslims of Kokrajhar and Kaziranga were suspicious while those in Dhubri were open, expansive and even polemical.

    ‘Assamese Muslims always identify themselves as Assamese, not by religion’

    Demography explains the contrasting mood. According to the 2011 Census, the Bodo-dominated Kokrajhar district has 59.64% Hindus while only 28.44% are Muslims. But in neighbouring Dhubri, Hindus are 19.92% and Muslims 79.67%. Their higher numbers in Dhubri perhaps provided them a sense of security, prompting confidence in engaging in a political discussion. Interestingly, the Muslims of Bagbari and neighbouring Lakhiganj village said they had voted for the BJP in 2016.

    Asked why, pat came Usman’s reply: “Because they promised parivartan (change).” Two things are clear from this: firstly, the characterisation of the Muslims being anti- BJP may be misplaced as many had voted for it the last time. Secondly, the narrative of Muslims being a captive voting bloc of either the Congress or the AIUDF could be erroneous. Despite the AIUDF’s strong presence in Dhubri, widely considered the gateway of illegal immigration from Bangladesh, some Bagbari villagers were willing to vote for the Raijor Dal, a political newbie.

    The fear and loathing of the BJP is not surprising. The party, particularly state finance minster and Assam BJP’s strongman, Himanta Biswa Sarma, has run a campaign against the Miyas, or Bengali-speaking Muslims who came to Assam from Bangladesh. Sarma has often said the party does not need the votes of Miyas. This seems to have antagonised not only the Bengali Muslims but even the Assamese Muslims, creating a new dynamic in minority politics. Assamese Muslims are counted among the indigenous people of the state, unlike the Bengali-speaking Muslims, who are considered as outsiders. As a result, the Assamese Muslims have been strongly opposed to illegal immigration by Bengali Muslims and have supported any political party that has fought against this.

    But the campaign against the Miyas seems to have driven the Assamese Muslims to close ranks with the Bengali Muslims against the BJP, purely because they have a common religious denomination. Sipping fruit juice from a tetra pack and cooled by a pedestal fan inside his office in Goalpara, Mofiyal Rahman, an Assamese Muslim and owner of a nursing home-cum-pharmaceutical shop, said Sarma had asked people to not eat food served by Miyas. “The comment was directed at the Bengali Muslims but this is not correct and we are upset. After all, we share the same religion,” said Rahman. Rahman’s assertion of his religion has lent a new turn to Assam’s complex identity politics.

    The Assamese Muslims like Rahman have never identified themselves by their religion, always calling themselves simply as Assamese. In fact, there is little to differentiate between an Assamese Hindu and a Muslim. They speak the same language, share the same food habits, celebrate the same festivals and are culturally united. Barring the religion, the two communities are indistinguishable. “Assamese Muslims are more Assamese than the Hindus.

    They have always identified themselves only as Assamese, not by their religion. Bengalis are culturally different,” said Arindam Borkotaky, a political analyst and lecturer at ADP College, Nagaon. Many Assamese Muslims, estimated to be 20 lakh out of the total Muslim population of 1.03 crore, are said to have supported the BJP in 2016. “But this time the Muslims and Christians will not vote for the BJP. All minorities feel threatened by it,” said Satyakam Borthakur, a teacher at Dibrugarh University.

  • Day before Assam polls, Shah says BJP will enact laws to prevent ‘love and land jihad’ in state

    By Online Desk
    A day before Assam gets ready for its first phase of Assembly elections, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said at a rally that BJP will enact laws to prevent “love and land jihad”.

    Addressing a rally in Assam’s Kamrup, Shah said AIUDF leader Badruddin Ajmal is doing ‘land jihad’.

    “I give you a guarantee that after five years you will not find anyone indulging in ‘land jihad’ in the state.” said the BJP leader.

    ​ALSO READ | Assam Assembly elections: 47 constituencies gear up for first phase of polls amid COVID-19

    Shah also questioned the voters if Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and modern Kalapahad Badruddin Ajmal would keep Assam safe. 

    He also said ‘if Badruddin Ajmal government is formed here, will it be able to stop infiltrators? Only BJP govt can stop the infiltrators. PM Modi speaks of developing Assam with the help of double engine govt and Congress brings Kalapahad to facilitate double infiltration”

    Assam is all set to witness mostly direct or triangular contests between the ruling BJP, its alliance partner the Asom Gana Parishad, opposition Congress and the newly formed Assam Jatiya Parishad in the first of the three-phased assembly elections.

    (Inputs from ANI)

  • Some people in Delhi preparing to form UPA-II, claims Shiv Sena’s Sanjay Raut 

    By PTI
    MUMBAI: Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut on Friday said that “some people in Delhi” are preparing to form UPA-II, which is why the existing UPA needs to be strengthened if the opposition is to fight the BJP.

    He made the statement while speaking to reporters in Delhi, a day after he reiterated that NCP chief Sharad Pawar should head the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) that is currently being led by the Congress.

    Replying to a question, Raut said the “drama” of forming “third, fourth or fifth fronts” has failed so far, hence the existing UPA needs to be strengthened.

    “Some people in Delhi are preparing to form UPA-II. Hence, I am saying this out of concern. The UPA-I has to be strengthened,” he said, without specifying who these people in the national capital are.

    He said the importance of the present-day UPA will reduce if the UPA-II is formed and then the opposition parties will have nothing in their hands.

    On Raut’s suggestion that Pawar should lead the UPA, Maharashtra Congress leaders had on Thursday asked the Shiv Sena leader to desist from making such comments as his party is not even part of the alliance.

    When asked about the Maharashtra Congress leaders’ comments and its state unit chief Nana Patole also questioning Raut if he is the spokesperson of Pawar, the Shiv Sena leader replied, “Maybe. Sharad Pawar is a leader of the country. All know what Sharad Pawar or Uddhav Thackeray are.”

    Raut said one need not be part of the UPA to speak about it.

    “The issue of the UPA is not of a state, but a national one. So the people from the state should not talk about it,” he added.

    The Rajya Sabha member said that discussion needs to be held on strengthening the alliance of the opposition parties if they are to take on the BJP.

    “If the (Congress) leaders in Maharashtra are not getting this, then they need to study… they are our colleagues, but they should understand.

    “We will give a reply if Sonia Gandhi or Rahul Gandhi are to speak on this issue. But they are not speaking. They are also analysing this (the situation),” he added.

    The Parliamentarian also said that Maharashtra Congress leaders should also make it clear whether they think the UPA should not be strengthened.

    “Sonia Gandhi is leading the UPA. She has led it in an excellent manner for 17 years. But considering the future politics, the issue needs to be discussed,” he said.

  • No development in 10 years, Mamata took Bengal back to 19th century, says Rajnath

    By PTI
    JOYPUR: Accusing Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of “taking back Bengal to the 19th century, with no development work undertaken in the past 10 years”, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Thursday said the TMC dispensation, just like its predecessor, the Left Front, has wronged the people of the state.

    Singh, who addressed a series of public meetings in Purulia, Bankura and South 24 Parganas districts, took at dig at the TMC’s khela hobe (game will be played) slogan, and said Bengal, now on, will witness only work and development.

    Alleging that the TMC supremo delivers speeches encouraging acts of violence and aggression, the union minister said, “Unke bhashan mein bhi hingsha hote hai. woh kehti hai ke isko mar bhagao, usko bartan se pit pit kar bhagao (During her speeches, she talks of violence. she asks people to beat up and oust a few, hit others with utensils).”

    He wondered if the chief minister “seeks to divide the country” by repeatedly terming people who have come from other states as outsiders.

    Stressing that the Bharatiya Jan Sangh, which later became the BJP, was established by Syama Prasad Mookerjee — a son of Bengal — Singh said, “Will any brother from this state be considered an outsider in Uttar Pradesh? All people born on the soil of India are brothers to each other.”

    Claiming that the TMC dispensation has done nothing for the people of Bengal, Singh said, “How is it possible that those belonging to one party (BJP) are outsiders, while you, having ruined Bengal, are an insider? The CM, instead of undertaking development work, makes thoughtless remarks.

    “Neither ‘Maa nor mati or manush’ (mother, motherland, and people) feel safe in the state.”

    ‘Maa, Mati, manush’ is another slogan that was coined by the TMC during 2009 general election.

    Singh further accused Banerjee of not fulfilling her promise of putting an end to water crisis in Purulia.

    “Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on his part, has promised piped water availablility in every household of the country by the end of 2024,” the defence minister stated.

    Drawing parallels between the BJP and former India cricket captain Saurav Ganguly, he said just like the stylish southpaw, who hit a sixer whenever he stepped out of the crease, people have placed the saffron party across the crease during the Lok Sabha polls by giving it 18 seats in West Bengal.

    No one can now stop us from hitting a sixer,” he said.

    Maintaining that the BJP government at the Centre has never discriminated against the people of the state, as often alleged by the TMC, the senior saffron party leader said, “The Congress-led UPA government at the Centre had given Rs 1.32 lakh crore to Bengal under the 13th Finance Commission, while the Modi government allotted Rs 4.48 lakh crore to the state under the 14th Finance Commission.”

    Noting that more than 150 saffron camp workers have been killed in West Bengal, the senir BJP leader said that it is the responsibility of the state’s chief minister to ensure the safety and security of its people, no matter which party they bore allegiance to.

    “Bomb-making factories are openly being run in Bengal. If the same had happened in Uttar Pradesh (of which he was once the chief minister), the matter would have been dealt with sternly.”

    “The BJP, if allowed to form government in Bengal, will make security arrangements not just for saffron camp workers, but also those belonging to the Congress, Left and the TMC,” he said, exuding confidence that his party will bag more than 200 seats in the state.

    Emphasising that the BJP is not a party that creates enmity between people, he said, the TMC supremo has been trying to divide the people of Bengal on religious lines.

    “The BJP will not practice discrimination on the basis of religion. It would rather punish anyone creating trouble or indulging in such crimes. Now no one will be able to stop Durga Puja celebrations or Saraswati Puja in Bengal,” he said.

    Controversy had erupted in 2017 at a school in Tehatta, Nadia district, over celebration of Saraswati puja, with one section of students apparently trying to stop another group from observing the festival.

    In that very year, the West Bengal government had imposed curbs on Durga idol immersion, as the occasion coincided with Muharram, but the high court later eased the restrictions.

    Insisting that the country has become stronger under the Narendra Modi dispensation, the Defence Minister said that the Indian Army “stood firm” during a face-off with China in Ladakh, referring to the incursions by the Chinese PLA and the disengagement of the armies thereafter.

    He also said that the country has taught Pakistan a lesson with airstrikes on terror bases to eliminate ultras, following attacks in Uri and Pulwama in Jammu and Kashmir.

    “Modiji has a 56-inch chest. If you want to see a strong India, you have to bring the BJP government to power in Bengal as well,” he said.

  • Mamata reduced Bengal to state of penury: Adityanath hits out at Bengal CM

    By PTI
    KOLKATA: BJP leader Yogi Adityanath Thursday said that West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has reduced the state to extreme penury with no intention of developing it but “promoting goons and extortionists”.

    Speaking at three public rallies in Sagar assembly constituency in South 24 Parganas, Chandrakona in West Midnapore and Nandigram in East Midnapore here, Adityanath said that Bengal once upon a time was the most advanced and progressive state in the country.

    “Bengal was once an advanced state and progressive too. But first the Congress, then the Communists and now the Trinamool Congress have destroyed the industrial development of the state and allowed corruption to blossom unbound,” he said.

    He said the count down has begun and after 35 days BJP will form the government in Bengal.

    “The people of West Bengal are yearning for jobs and development. People will be benefitted by the development which will take place then”.

    The Uttar Pradesh chief minister said the soil of Bengal has produced great patriots like Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore, Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay and Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.

    Referring to Syama Prasad Mukherjee, the founder of Bharatiya Jana Sangh, Adityanath said he raised his voice against Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir which has been scrapped by the BJP-led government at the Centre fulfilling his dream.

    He said the saffron party leader Suvendu Adhikari, once a follower of Banerjee had shown courage to leave TMC and join BJP with the vision to create a prosperous state.

    Hitting out at TMC, Adityanath said it had “successfully produced goons and extortionists who have destroyed the development of the state”.

    He claimed that in the last ten years under Mamata Banerjee’s chief ministership, people did not get money in their hands though funds had been sent by the Centre like after Cyclone Amphan.

    “Prime Minister Narendra Modi had given Rs 1000 crore to the state just after Amphan cyclone. That money never went to the hands of the people but was taken away by TMC leaders,” he said.

    Adityanath said people of UP have received benefits of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana, the PM Ujjwala scheme, Ayushman Bharat and farmers under Kisan Samman Nidhi scheme.

    “Then why the people of West Bengal will be deprived of these benefits ? This shows TMC is not bothered about the development of the state,” he added.

    He said once the state gets the government by the party (BJP) that is in power at the Centre, then benefits will flow to the people of the state.

    Commenting on Mamata Banerjee’s opposition to ‘Jai Sri Ram’ slogan of BJP, Adityanath said there was a government in UP which also disliked it like her.

    “But the people of UP overthrew the government and brought BJP into power”.

    Taking a dig at the TMC supremo, he said she is only keen to protect the infiltrators and has always encouraged the politics of appeasement to preserve her vote bank.

    “If BJP is given a chance to come to power in West Bengal, infiltration will be stopped”, he said.

    Adityanath said India is fighting terrorism under the leadership of Modi.

    “Earlier, Pakistan used to enter Indian territory and launch attacks. But, now Indian jawans are launching surgical strikes destroying terrorists camps in that country”, he added.

  • Bengal polls: Parties bank on identity politics, promise of industrialisation in high-profile Nandigram seat

    By PTI
    NANDIGRAM: Identity politics and industrialisation have emerged as poll planks in West Bengal’s high-profile Nandigram seat, where Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee will contest her former lieutenant and BJP candidate Suvendu Adhikari.

    In a constituency where 30 per cent minority votes can influence the results, both the BJP and TMC are also engaged in competitive Hindutva to woo the majority community.

    The obscure agrarian region in Purba Medinipur district had shaken the foundation of the mighty Left Front regime through the anti-land acquisition movement in 2007 that had ultimately catapulted the TMC to power in 2011.

    The then two prominent faces of the stir, Banerjee and Adhikari, will now contest each other in the second of the eight-phase elections on April 1.

    The CPI(M), with its young candidate Minakshi Mukherjee, is seeking to regain its ground lost to the BJP.

    Apart from communal polarisation, the constituency is also witnessing the ‘insider-outsider’ debate but here, Banerjee, who has used the plank to label BJP as a ‘party of outsiders’, is facing the flak as Adhikari is projecting himself as a ‘Bhoomiputra’ (son of soil) and the TMC chief as an outsider from Kolkata.

    Banerjee, who lives in Kalighat area of the metropolis, has left her Bhowanipore constituency in the city to battle her former cabinet minister in Nandigram.

    To counter the ‘outsider’ label, Banerjee has branded her former confidante Adhikari as ‘Mir Jafar’, a commander of Bengal’s last independent nawab Siraj ud-Daula who had betrayed the ruler at the Battle of Plassey leading to the East India Company’s victory.

    Ironically, political parties of all hues are now promising industrialisation in the region, that had tooth- and-nail opposed a chemical hub in the area proposed by the Left Front, so that people don’t have to migrate to other places for employment.

    Parties other than the TMC and BJP, however, feel that the electoral tussle in Nandigram has become a prestige issue and personal fight for both Adhikari and Banerjee over the legacy of the anti-land acquisition movement.

    “Nandigram had never before witnessed such communal polarisation as is being seen during the electoral contest between Banerjee and Adhikari, in which minority votes will play a key role,” local SUCI (C) Bhabani Prasad Das said.

    Two contrasting murals on a mud wall — one of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ slogan and the other of Adhikari dressed as Mir Jafar bowing before the BJP — sums up the political mood in the constituency.

    An Islamic cleric said Muslims will vote wisely as the choice is tough.

    “On one hand, Suvendu has been one of our own for many years, while on the other, Mamata di had stood by us like a rock during the movement days. The choice will be tough,” he said.

    For Adhikari, the electoral battle is that of political survival as defeat will likely stunt his growth in his new party, while victory will establish him as one of the tallest leaders in the state and push him ahead in the race for the chief minister’s post if BJP attains a majority in the 294-member assembly.

    For Banerjee, who is running for a third term as the chief minister, victory is essential not only to lead the government but also to keep her party together in the face of an unprecedented exodus.

    Nandigram has 2,57,299 voters, of whom 1,33,323 are males and 1,23,975 females.

    The assembly segment comprises two blocks — Nandigram I and Nandigram II — with the first having 35 per minority population and the second almost 15 per cent.

    Adhikari has claimed that Banerjee is fighting the polls from the seat as she believes the TMC will pocket the entire monitory vote share.

    “Out of 2,57,299 voters, around 68,000 are from the minority community. She thinks people of the minority community will vote for her. But I firmly believe that Hindus, who are against her brand of appeasement politics, will vote for me,” he had said.

    With identity politics taking centre-stage in the Nandigram election campaign, Banerjee has been using ‘soft Hindutva’ to counter Adhikari’s aggressive Hindutva campaign.

    Confident of bagging the major chunk of the minority votes, especially after Abbas Siddiqui’s Indian Secular Front (ISF) decided against contesting the seat and leaving it for alliance partner CPI(M), the feisty TMC boss is now trying to woo a section of the Hindus as well.

    From visiting 12 temples to reciting Sanskrit slokas to asserting her Brahmin identity, Banerjee has pulled all the stops to reach out to the electorate of Nandigram, especially to the majority community, as the party is now apprehensive of a Hindu consolidation in favour of the BJP.

    Apart from harping on her ‘Bangla Nijer Meyeke Chai’ (Bengal wants its daughter) poll slogan to shed the ‘outsider’ tag labelled on her by Adhikari, Banerjee is also flaunting her Brahmin identity.

    “Both Hindus and Muslims are with the TMC. We don’t need any certificate from the BJP on secularism or Hinduism. We don’t believe in dividing communities,” local party leader Swadesh Das said.

    With the cultivation of paddy and vegetables and pisciculture generating only around Rs 5,000-Rs 6,000 monthly income, almost every family has a migrant worker in Kolkata or other parts of the country.

    Unemployment and the hardships faced during the coronavirus-induced lockdown last year have prompted the locals to demand industrialisation, which they had opposed 14 years ago.

    “We want industry in Nandigram. Our children work in other states, stay there for months. Industrialisation of the area would be beneficial for all of us,” Krishnendu Mondal, the elder brother of Bharat Mondal killed during the anti-land acquisition movement here in 2007, said.

    Political parties have also adjusted their electoral promises, sensing the change in demands of the locals.

    While Banerjee has vowed to make Nandigram a “model area” by implementing several development projects including a university, Adhikari has pledged to usher in a new era of industrial growth.

    The CPI(M), which is fighting a lone battle to prove its relevance in the area it had dominated for decades, alleged that both Adhikari and Banerjee are misleading the people of Nandigram to serve their political interests.

    “When we wanted to bring industry in Nandigram, the TMC had opposed it and misled the people. Now, when people want industry, it is bringing up the issue of communal polarisation,” CPI(M) candidate Minakshi Mukherjee said.

    Mukherjee, the 34-year old firebrand orator and DYFI state president, said the Congress-Left-ISF alliance if voted to power will take people along and work towards industrialisation of the area.

    Nandigram was a CPI bastion from the 1950s to 2007, when the Left Front government’s attempt to industrialise the area backfired.

    Since 2008, Nandigram has been a TMC bastion, with party candidate Firoja Bibi winning the seat twice, in a by-election and again in 2011.

    Banerjee had nominated Adhikari in the seat in 2016 and he won by bagging near 68 per cent of the votes.

    However, with the Left and Congress pushed to the margins of the state politics, BJP has made slow and steady inroads into the area riding on anti-incumbency and identity politics.

    Communal polarisation was first witnessed in the area when the saffron camp managed to take out a massive Ram Navami rally in 2015 and many TMC supporters had even taken part in the programme.

    Riding on the Left’s declining vote share and grievances of the Hindus, the BJP made deep inroads into the area.

    The saffron party’s meteoric rise was noticed in the 2016 byelection to the Tamluk Lok Sabha seat, under which Nandigram assembly constituency falls, when it secured the second position by bagging 1,96,450 votes.

    The BJP further consolidated its position in 2019, bagging nearly 37 per cent of votes and coming runners-up.

    It is to be seen whether the BJP can improve its Lok Sabha result with the influential Adhikari family by its side.

    TMC’s Kanthi MP Sisir Adhikari also recently joined the BJP.

    “This time the fight is between the present TMC and the turncoat TMC. There is no BJP or CPI(M),” Bhaswati Jana said.

    SUCI(C)’s Manoj Kumar Das and four other independent candidates are also in the fray.

  • Woman in saree flaunting her leg not reflection of Bengali culture: Dilip Ghosh justifies ‘bermudas’ comment

    By PTI
    KHARAGPUR: Justifying his controversial comment on Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, West Bengal BJP president Dilip Ghosh said on Thursday that a woman in a saree flaunting her leg is not a reflection of the Bengali culture.

    Addressing an election rally in Purulia on Tuesday, Ghosh had targetted Banerjee over her injured leg, saying that if she has to display her “broken leg” for votes, she can very well wear Bermuda shorts, which help people see it clearly.

    Asked about the comment, Ghosh told reporters, “Being a woman chief minister we certainly expect from her some decency that goes well with the culture and tradition of Bengal, and with the values of a Bengali woman.”

    “However, here we can see a saree-clad woman who is flaunting her leg frequently. Do you consider this as a reflection of the culture of Bengal? I have protested against this (at the meeting),” he said.

    Reacting to Ghosh’s justification, the Trinamool Congress said the BJP president has gone on to defend the insult he meted out to the “daughter of Bengal” and the people will punish the “misogyny”.

    “Be it saree clad women or those wearing ripped jeans, Bengal won’t forgive!” it tweeted.

    State minister Chandrima Bhattacharya said that women of Bengal won’t give a single vote to people of such mindset.

    Actor-turned-politician Nusrat Jahan said, “Misogyny and the need to control women as per the wishes of men is so deeply embedded in BJP leaders that it’s a matter of national concern now.”

    The BJP state president has earlier been in the midst of controversies for his comments, which ranged from claims that the milk of “desi” cows milk has gold content to demands that Balakot-like surgical strikes be carried out on Jadavpur University to drive out Communists.

    The chief minister has been campaigning for the elections on a wheelchair with her left leg plastered after she was injured in an incident in Nandigram soon after filing her nomination papers on March 10.

    She had alleged that the BJP hatched a conspiracy to prevent her from campaigning by organising the “attack”, a charge rubbished by the opposition party.

  • High-pitched campign for first phase poll in Assam ends

    By PTI
    GUWAHATI: The high-pitched campaign for the first phase of poll in Assam in 47 assembly constituencies slated for March 27 came to an end on Thursday evening.

    The poll on Saturday will decide the fate of 264 candidates.

    Implementation of the Citizenship Amednment Act, 2019 was the central issue in the state, which was rocked by violence and protests against it, but BJP, which had steered the central legislation in Parliament maintained a studied silence on it.

    The issue did not find place in the campaigning by the party nor in its manifesto.

    However, party president J P Nadda’s comment that it is an act of Parliament and will be implemented saw protests across the state by political parties students union AASU.

    The Congress on the other hand assured that if voted to power, it will bring a legislation in the assembly so that the act is not implemented in Assam.

    The hectic campaigning for the first phase was marked by poll meetings by several national leaders of the ruling BJP and the opposition Congress, who criss crossed the state to garner support for their respective parties.

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi had led the campaign brigade for BJP and its alliance partner, the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP).

    The other BJP leaders who wooed the voters in Assam were BJP President J P Nadda, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and Union Agriculture Minister Narendra Tomar, who is also partys state in-charge.

    The others leaders from outside to hold campaign rallies were Textile and Handloom Minister Smriti Iraniand chief ministers Yogi Adityanath and Shivraj Singh Chouhan.

    Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal and BJP state unit President Ranjeet Kumar Dass and North East Democratic Alliance convenor and state minister Himanta Biswa Sarma campaigned in the constituencies which are spread across upper and central Assam.

    The highlight of the opposition Congress campaign was the visit of its top leaders Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra in the tea belt, besides Chhatisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel, who is in charge of the partys campaign in Assam.

    Other leaders who campaigned for Congress included former Maharashtra chief minister Ashok Chavan, AICC general secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala and Gaurav Gogoi, the chairman of the mannifesto committee.

    The BJP in its vampign spoke against the alliance between Congress and ther saying it would lead to increase in infiltration, a critical issu in the state.

    The increased infiltration will lead to threats to the land, language, identity and culture of the state’s indigenous population, it insisted.

    The Congress in its campaign presented its Five guarantees’.

    These are five lakh government jobs to youths in five years, 200 units of free electricity for every household, increasing the daily wages of the tea garden workers to Rs 365 and Rs 2000 per month to homemakers, besides the legislation against the implementation of the CAA.

    The newly floated political parties Assam Jatiya Parishad and Raijor Dal relied mostly on door-to-door campaigns and street corner meetings.

    With ‘Rongali Bihu’, the popular spring festival of the Assamese about a fortnight away, supporters of the political parties were seen dancing the ‘jhumur’, the folk dance of the tea tribes or swaying to their election songs which have become particularly popular among the voters.

    Prominent among those whose fates will be decided in the first phase are Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal, Speaker Hitendra Nath Goswami, ministers Atul Bora, Keshab Mahanta, Ranjit Dutta, Naba Kumar Doley, Sanjoy Kishan and Nazir Hussain.

    The others are Assam Pradesh Congress Committee President Ripun Bora, Congress Legislature Party leader Debabrata Saikia, AICC secretary Bhupen Borah and former ministers of the party Bharat Narah, Pranatee Phukan and Rakibul Hussain.

    The fates of jailed Raijor Dal president Akhil Gogoi and Assam Jatiya Parishad president Lurinjyoti Gogoi along with his party general secretary Jagadish Bhuyan will also be decided in the first phase.

    BJP is contesting in 39 of the 47 seats while its alliance partner the AGP in 10, including two where it is in friendly contest against the saffron party.

    The Congress is contesting in 43 seats and its allies AIUDF, RJD, Anchalik Gana Morcha (as independent) and CPI-ML in one seat each.

    Assam Jatiya Parishad is contesting in 41 seats while the Raijor Dal is contesting in 19 seats as independents.

    A total of 78 independents are in the fray in the first phase.

    There are 23 women candidates in the fray in the first phase, Election Commission sources said.

  • Four Pakistans can be created if India’s 30 per cent Muslims united, says Trinamool ‘leader’

    By PTI
    NANOOR: A video clip, where a local leader, with a TMC poster in hand, is heard stating “four Pakistans can be created if India’s 30 per cent Muslims united”, has drawn major flak from the BJP, which sought to know if the ruling party in Bengal endorses such remarks.

    The TMC, however, has distanced itself from the comment, stating that Sheikh Alam, seen in the video, is not a member of the TMC, and the party doesn’t support what he said.

    The 30-second video, apparently shot at Nanoor in Birbhum, has gone viral on social media.

    Alam is heard saying in the clip, “We minorities constitute 30% (of the population). The rest make for 70%. They (BJP) think they will come to power (in Bengal) with the help of this 70%. If 30% of minorities unite, if India’s Muslims unite, four Pakistan can be created. Where will India’s 70% go?”

    Reacting to the clip, BJP national general secretary and the party’s Bengal minder, Kailash Vijayvargiya, said it exposes the TMC’s real intention.

    “This video brings out the truth about the TMC. This is a serious thing. How can someone staying in India claim that he will turn the country into Pakistan? We will never allow this to happen. Mamataji owes a reply to the people of the state and the country,” he said.

    Senior BJP leader Amit Malviya, in a tweet, wondered if Banerjee endorses Alam’s stance.

    “Yday, TMC leader Sheikh Alam, giving a speech in Basa para, Nanoor, in Birbhum AC said, if 30% Muslims in India come together, then 4 Pakistan can be formed. He obviously owes his allegiance to Mamata Banerjee. Does she endorse this position? Do we want a Bengal like that?” he tweeted.

    TMC Birbhum district president Anubrata Mandal, however, quickly clarified that Alam was not a leader of the state’s ruling camp.

    “Sheikh Alam is neither a member of the party nor is he a leader from Nanoor. We have no relation with him. We don’t support such statements. India is a secular country and will remain so,” he said.

    Sheikh, when approached by reporters, said his words have been misinterpreted.

    “I never said we want to build a Pakistan in India. I just wanted to convey that if the Muslims are threatened, then we, too, know how to care of ourselves,” he said.

  • BJP’s double standard on CAA exposed, party scared to raise issue in Assam: Baghel

    He said the BJP had been avoiding answers on unemployment, inflation, devastating floods, the plight of tea plantation workers and the thriving syndicate of smugglers.