Posting on X, Sarma minced no words: ‘No need for me to learn about democracy, public debate, or manners—certainly not from A.M. Singhvi. Civility flees the room when Singhvi enters.’

Sarma reframed the dispute, calling out what he sees as a vicious smear campaign against his apolitical wife. He alleged that national TV was weaponized with fabricated foreign documents to defame her, far removed from legitimate political exchange.

Expressing unwavering faith in the judiciary, he said, ‘Courts will eventually address this outrage—punishing those who used falsehoods to malign a woman and manipulate elections.’

He accused Singhvi of cherry-picking battles: ‘It’s simple to rant in my absence. That’s not engagement; it’s deliberate avoidance of open dialogue.’

Sarma wrapped up with a resolute vow: ‘Merely the start. Truth prevails.’

The backdrop involves Supreme Court granting anticipatory bail to Congress’s Pawan Kheda for comments linked to Rinki Bhuyan Sarma. The bench, led by Justices Maheshwari and Chandurkar, imposed safeguards.

Singhvi had lambasted Sarma’s involvement, citing court remarks on unbecoming public rhetoric that erodes democratic standards. He stressed safeguarding disagreement and speech freedoms.

This latest clash has ratcheted up BJP-Congress animosity in Assam. With accusations flying thick and fast, the episode highlights risks of personal vendettas spilling into politics.

Legal experts predict prolonged scrutiny, as Sarma’s response galvanizes his base while exposing fault lines in opposition tactics. The ‘Satyameva Jayate’ sign-off echoes a broader narrative of resilience against perceived injustices.

Firing salvos at D.K. Shivakumar, who holds dual roles as Deputy CM and state Congress chief, Ashoka called it unfortunate that ambitious politicians defend ‘anti-national’ figures just to climb the power ladder. He recalled Shivakumar’s past statements downplaying the blast as a BJP ploy to overshadow a Bengaluru data breach scandal, questioning premature terror tags without investigation.

The court ruling, Ashoka emphasized, validates the incident’s gravity, shattering Congress’s narrative. ‘Leaders who label terrorists as brothers for votes are a danger to Karnataka,’ he thundered, accusing the party of consistent soft-pedaling on security threats.

Back in 2022, the explosion in an auto-rickshaw sent shockwaves, with Congress leaders quick to politicize it. Today’s conviction reignites the debate, positioning BJP to expose what it calls Congress’s ‘real agenda’ – prioritizing electoral math over public safety.

With elections on the horizon, this clash highlights stark ideological differences. BJP urges voters to see through the ‘tushthikaran’ (appeasement) strategy, while Congress remains silent so far, leaving the opposition to dominate the narrative on this sensitive issue.

The controversy stems from Wadettiwar’s cryptic words: ‘What goes around comes around. From the highest office, he harassed nations worldwide, seeking dominance and enslaving the globe, while devastating our own country.’ BJP interprets this as a sinister nod to violence, reminiscent of Trump’s brush with death.

Kesavan revisited Wadettiwar’s history of controversies, including his past skepticism over 26/11 narratives involving Hemant Karkare’s sacrifice and Kasab’s guilt. ‘Congress routinely undermines our fight against terror,’ he charged, accusing the party of Pakistan appeasement.

Turning the spotlight on Congress bosses, Kesavan demanded accountability from Sonia and Rahul Gandhi. ‘Their silence emboldens such toxicity,’ he asserted. This episode fits into BJP’s broader narrative of Congress indulging in hate-mongering politics.

As the video goes viral, it has sparked nationwide outrage, with netizens and BJP supporters rallying against what they call ‘anti-national rhetoric.’ Political analysts predict this will fuel BJP’s campaign, portraying Congress as reckless. With stakes high, expect more fireworks in the coming days.

Citing a fresh US report, Gupta questioned the Congress-Pakistan nexus. ‘The same document maligns RAW. Does the opposition believe every word in it, including the hits on our spy agency?’ he challenged, calling it evidence of a deeper malaise.

He criticized the opposition for habitually siding with adversaries during national crises. ‘Opposition isn’t about blanket rejection; it’s about national duty,’ Gupta stated firmly.

On LPG woes, he lauded the Modi government’s resilience. Global oil shocks haven’t rattled India thanks to proactive measures. ‘Prices remain controlled – that’s policy success in action,’ he said.

The surge in LPG demand to 88 lakh from 50 lakh was opposition-orchestrated chaos, Gupta claimed, but authorities restored order promptly. ‘We safeguard citizens; they play games.’

Recalling Congress’s dark past – cash bundles in Parliament during 2008 vote-buying and Bofors – Gupta highlighted the clean governance under BJP. ‘This is the real divide: corruption versus integrity. The public hasn’t forgotten Congress’s legacy.’

Gupta’s words underscore escalating political tensions ahead of key electoral battles.

Emphasizing BJP’s commitment, Ravi stated, “Our foreign policy is built to advance India’s interests, never for political mileage. We think of the country first, always have and always will.”

Addressing reactions to Khamenei’s death, Ravi expressed bewilderment at the public displays of sorrow in India. “Why are people mourning Khamenei here? What relevance does he hold for us? These mourners were silent when terrorists slaughtered innocents in Pahalgam. Some openly favored Sharia law over our Constitution—how can they be Indians?”

Responding to Sonia Gandhi’s call for Parliament to discuss Iran, Ravi invited open dialogue. “We’re open to debate, but Congress mustn’t evade it. Unlike them, BJP doesn’t exploit national matters for votes. Our loyalty lies solely with the nation’s good.”

On India-Israel relations, Ravi questioned Congress’s stance. “Strong bonds with Israel benefit India—why object? Congress politicizes international issues unacceptably. Israel is a true ally; their opposition makes no sense.”

Ravi’s pointed remarks reignite debates on how political rivalries influence India’s global positioning, urging a focus on strategic partnerships over domestic squabbles.

Singh vividly recalled the 2020 Delhi violence, timed suspiciously with Donald Trump’s India visit. ‘Umar Khalid set the stage to defame us globally,’ he said. Echoing this pattern, Rahul Gandhi reportedly engineered protests during the high-profile AI Summit attended by 20 world leaders. Singh questioned the venue choice: protests could have targeted domestic sites like Jantar Mantar, avoiding international fallout.

‘Whose DNA imprints on whom? Their actions scream anti-national intent,’ Singh fumed. Pivoting to positives, he lauded Israel’s unwavering support in tough times, from tech transfers to strategic aid, all nurtured under PM Modi’s visionary leadership.

Modi’s Instagram triumph—crossing 100 million followers as the world’s most-followed leader—exemplifies his mass appeal, Singh noted proudly. Addressing the Shimla police standoff during Youth Congress detentions, he urged judicial oversight: ‘Let the law take its course against wrongdoers.’

Singh wrapped up by contrasting ideologies: Rahul’s brand thrives on slander and foreign appeasement, while BJP’s ‘nation above all’ approach propels India towards self-sufficiency, robust defense, economic boom, and enhanced world respect.

Sapra turned the tables on BJP’s demands for Rahul’s apology following Youth Congress’s AI Summit demonstration. Labeling it ‘manufactured anger,’ he recalled their indifference to explicit threats against Rahul’s life. ‘Their hypocrisy exposes them as mere spectators damaging India’s reputation abroad,’ Sapra charged.

Defending the youth wing’s action as a model of peaceful democracy, Sapra pointed to historical precedents: Bhagat Singh’s bold stand in Parliament, BJP protests at Commonwealth Games. ‘Double standards define them—miracles if they protest, sins if we do. Our workers showed restraint, no destruction involved.’

He accused BJP of eroding India’s sovereignty, from Trump-forced ceasefires with Pakistan to trade announcements from Washington dictating India’s oil imports. ‘Eleven years of schemes: polarizing movies like Kashmir Files and Kerala tales to stoke divisions for votes.’

Invoking Gandhi’s iconic non-violent movement as national ethos, Sapra contrasted it with BJP’s drama. Even as US courts chide Trump, he persists with deal claims. Sapra’s words underscore Congress’s unyielding opposition to what he deems BJP’s image-tarnishing conspiracies.

Facts have swiftly unraveled Gandhi’s story. Publisher Penguin Enterprises clarified unequivocally that no such title is in their catalog or slated for release. General Naravane echoed this, stating any purported copies floating around infringe on copyright.

Trivedi didn’t mince words, branding Gandhi’s conduct as a deliberate ploy to hoodwink the House and stoke controversy on national security. Recalling how the Leader of the House once called Gandhi an innocent child, Trivedi quipped he’s now acting like a sly manipulator weaving falsehoods.

Parliamentary chaos ensued as Gandhi tried quoting from the phantom book, prompting ruling party protests, MP suspensions, and a week-long stalemate in Lok Sabha. The government insists any draft is undergoing Defence Ministry scrutiny, countering opposition cries of suppression.

Complicating matters, Delhi Police registered an FIR against the leak of alleged manuscript portions. Trivedi slammed Congress for repeatedly lowering political standards by weaponizing defense matters. ‘Gandhi must apologize now that the truth is out—his claims stand exposed as fiction,’ he asserted.

This saga underscores deep rifts in India’s political landscape, where border heroism clashes with partisan blame games, leaving the nation questioning the maturity of its leaders.

Nadda, as Leader of the House, had cautioned Congress veterans against letting an ‘abodh balak’ – an unenlightened youngster – dictate party strategy in Lok Sabha. Trivedi broke it down: ‘Abodh’ derives from negating ‘bodh’ (knowledge), perfectly suiting one blind to House procedures.

He highlighted Gandhi’s folly in citing media clips as ‘substantial evidence,’ reminding that only tabling official records validates claims in Parliament. On military communications, Trivedi invoked the 1923 Official Secrets Act, stressing their classified nature precludes public airing.

To bolster his case, Trivedi unearthed a 1962 archival gem: Nehru’s desperate cable to Kennedy seeking US bombers and personnel, declassified in 2010 by the JFK Library. Ambassador BK Nehru’s memoir reveals his emotional turmoil handing over the missive, a family insider’s account of national humiliation.

‘Chacha ji’s capitulation, narrated by his own kin,’ Trivedi quipped. The Rajya Sabha flare-up saw Nadda’s address rile Kharge, who demanded retraction. Trivedi’s intervention transforms a parliamentary barb into a broader indictment of Congress legacy, fueling debates on leadership competence and historical accountability in Indian politics.

Sarma lambasted Gogoi, pointing to his ‘questionable’ remarks that allegedly echo Pakistani narratives. This isn’t the first time; the CM has consistently highlighted these red flags, fueling a bitter partisan clash. The BJP insists the inquiry safeguards public interest and national integrity.

Gogoi fired back, dismissing the allegations as politically motivated smears designed to overshadow real issues like development and administration. The Congress party alleges misuse of official probes to target opposition voices, especially with elections looming.

Formed amid public outcry, the SIT has navigated a storm of support from BJP allies and skepticism from critics questioning its impartiality. Sarma’s announcement positions the government as open and accountable, promising that the report’s disclosure will let the truth emerge unfiltered. Assam’s political arena braces for potential fireworks as February 8 approaches.