Tag: Anil Deshmukh corruption case

  • ‘Allegations against official serious’: CBI opposes bail plea in Delhi HC over corruption case

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: The CBI on Wednesday opposed in the Delhi High Court a plea by its official Abhishek Tiwari, seeking bail in connection with the alleged leak of the probe agency’s preliminary inquiry report in a corruption case against former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh, saying the allegations are serious and his release may become detrimental to a fair investigation.

    The CBI, in its reply to Tiwari’s bail plea, said as an officer of the agency, his duty was to detect and bring to justice those who were involved in corrupt practices but he himself has been found accused of the corrupt practices.

    “The offence is thus very serious and as the petitioner (Tiwari) has the clout and knowledge regarding practices of investigation, the release of the petitioner may become detrimental to a fair and proper investigation. The offence herein is a case of corruption and more so of the fence eating the crops,” it said.

    Justice Yogesh Khanna listed the matter for further hearing on October 5.

    The CBI had registered a case against its sub-inspector Tiwari, Nagpur-based advocate Anand Daga, who was working as a lawyer for Deshmukh, and others on various allegations, including illegal gratification.

    Daga was arrested for allegedly trying to subvert the Bombay High Court-directed preliminary enquiry against Deshmukh. According to the plea, Tiwari was detained on August 30, arrested on September 1, and is in judicial custody since September 6.

    He has challenged a special CBI court’s September 8 order which had rejected his bail application. The CBI, in its reply, said the present is a case of commission of the offence to prevent an investigation into another serious offence by illegal means.

    “The present offence is committed by a police officer and a lawyer, both of whom are obliged to protect and preserve the sanctity of the legal system in India. For the same rationale to which the courts have treated custodial deaths to be the worst form of crime (as committed by those who are obliged to protect lives), the present offence must be treated as an extremely serious one for the reason of its commission and the persons who have committed it. In our criminal jurisprudence if a lawyer and the police are permitted to make ‘arrangements’ and are then let off lightly, the entire criminal jurisprudence will collapse,” it said.

    The agency said that the investigation of the case is at a preliminary stage and huge electronic evidence has been recovered during various searches and the data has been extracted which may likely point to a larger conspiracy.

    It said that release of Tiwari at this juncture would be highly counter-productive to the fair investigation and may derail the probe.

    It added that the investigation is at an initial stage and there is a likelihood that if the accused is released on bail, he may tamper with the evidence and influence witnesses, and may abscond which would be detrimental to the investigation.

    Tiwari, in his bail plea filed through advocates Meenesh Dubey and Abdhesh Chaudhary, claimed that “the petitioner is a victim of circumstances in as much as he has been made a scapegoat and victimised by his senior in the CBI in order to put undue pressure for reason best known to them whereas, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is not involved in the alleged offence as put forth in the present criminal case”.

    The official said he has a clean and spotless service record and it was because of his integrity and uprightness that he was recommended by his seniors to the ongoing investigation relating to the former home minister of Maharashtra along with other officers.

    He alleged that he had not been allowed to perform his duty in a fearless manner for last more than one year and was always subjected to harassment and mental torture. The trial court had rejected the bail pleas of Tiwari and Daga, saying that the investigation was still inconclusive.

    A report of the preliminary enquiry (PE) purportedly giving clean chit to Deshmukh was leaked earlier causing embarrassment to the agency. The CBI started a probe into the leakage in which it emerged that findings of the PE were influenced.

    “Attempts by Anil Deshmukh’s team were in contempt of the Bombay High Court which had directed that all concerned should fully cooperate with the CBI while conducting the PE. In this case, it has appeared that Deshmukh’s team tried to subvert the PE,” the CBI had said.

    The CBI had started a PE on the orders of the Bombay High Court which had issued the direction while hearing public interest litigation on allegations of corruption against Deshmukh.

    In the FIR, the CBI had booked Deshmukh and others unidentified under IPC sections related to criminal conspiracy and sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act for “attempt to obtain undue advantage for the improper and dishonest performance of public duty”.

    Allegations against Deshmukh had surfaced after the removal of Mumbai Police Commissioner Param Bir Singh.

    He was removed after the alleged role of policeman Sachin Waze surfaced in the case of an explosive-laden SUV which was found parked outside the residence of industrialist Mukesh Ambani. Waze was arrested by the NIA.

    The FIR alleged that Deshmukh “and others” exercised undue influence over the transfer and posting of officials.

  • Param Bir Singh fined Rs 25,000 for not appearing before probe panel

    By ANI

    MUMBAI: An inquiry commission headed by retired Bombay High Court judge, Justice KU Chandiwal has imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on former Mumbai police commissioner Param Bir Singh for not appearing before it on Wednesday.

    It was the third time former Mumbai police commissioner has not appeared before the inquiry commission.

    The committee will convene for the next hearing on August 30.

    Meanwhile, former Maharashtra home minister Anil Deshmukh’s lawyer Advocate Anita Shekhar Castellino has requested the commission to issue a warrant against Singh for not appearing.

    The Justice Chandiwal committee was constituted by the Maharashtra government to look into the allegations of corruption levelled by Param Bir Singh against the state’s ex-home minister Anil Deshmukh.

    On August 13, a lookout notice was issued against former Mumbai Police Commissioner Param Bir Singh in an alleged extortion case.

    On July 23, a case of alleged extortion was registered against Param Bir Singh at Kopari Police Station in Thane city Police Commissionerate. This was then the second case of extortion in which Parambir Singh has been named.

    On July 28, Mumbai Police formed a seven-member Special Investigation Team headed by a Deputy Commissioner of Police-level officer to probe the corruption charges against the former Mumbai Police Commissioner and five others named in the case.

    Param Bir Singh, in his letter to Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, had earlier alleged that Deshmukh had indulged in “malpractices” and asked suspended Mumbai Police officer Sachin Waze to collect Rs 100 crores every month.

    Waze was arrested in March in connection with the National Investigation Agency’s (NIA) probe into the case of recovery of an explosives-laden SUV near Mukesh Ambani’s house in Mumbai and the subsequent murder of Thane businessman Mansukh Hiran.

    The case against the former Home Minister was registered on May 11. Earlier in April, the CBI had conducted raids at four premises of Deshmukh after registering an FIR against him in connection with the case.

    An FIR was filed based on Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (Public servant taking gratification other than legal remuneration in respect of an official act) and criminal conspiracy (IPC 120 B). During the searches, the CBI recovered incriminating documents and digital devices, sources had confirmed. 

  • Atrocities case not to pressurise ex-CP Param Bir Singh to withdraw complaint against Deshmukh: Cop to HC

    By PTI
    MUMBAI: Inspector Bhimrao Ghadge filed an affidavit in the Bombay High Court on Thursday, saying his case under the Atrocities Act lodged against former Mumbai police chief Param Bir Singh was not to pressurise him to withdraw his complaint against ex-Maharashtra minister Anil Deshmukh.

    Ghadge filed the affidavit through his advocate S B Talekar, opposing Singh’s petition seeking to quash the FIR registered against the former Mumbai police commissioner.

    The inspector alleged that Singh has defamed the police force by indulging in corrupt practices during his entire service career.

    Last week, a vacation bench of the HC posted Singh’s petition for hearing on May 21.

    The Maharashtra government had then assured the court that it would not arrest Singh till May 21.

    Singh in his petition filed earlier this month claimed he was being targeted by the Maharashtra government with false criminal cases as a backlash of a letter he wrote in March this year to Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, in which he levelled corruption allegations against Deshmukh.

    Ghadge in his affidavit termed Singh’s claim as “imaginary, concocted and fictional”.

    “I vehemently deny that the complaint was lodged by me and the FIR was registered by the police in an attempt to pressurise the petitioner (Singh) to withdraw the complaint letter dated March 20, 2021 written by him to the Chief Minister of Maharashtra,” Ghadge said in the affidavit.

    The attempt to link the complaint lodged by Ghadge with the letter written by Singh to the chief minister is baseless, the affidavit said.

    Ghadge also termed as false Singh’s claims that state Director General of Police Sanjay Pandey had conveyed to him that cases were being lodged against him (Singh) following his corruption complaint against NCP leader Deshmukh.

    “The petitioner cannot improve his case or discredit the complaint lodged by merely alleging malafides against Anil Deshmukh, former home minister of Maharashtra, or Sanjay Pandey, Director General of Police of Maharashtra,” the affidavit said.

    It further said Ghadge lodged his first complaint against Singh in January 2016, but at that time the case was not probed and hence, he lodged another complaint this year.

    Ghadge further claimed that when he refused to follow Singh’s directives in a few investigations, the latter implicated him in false and frivolous complaints.

    “The petitioner (Singh) has not only assassinated my character but has also subjected me to humiliation, indignity and mental torture by falsely implicating me in five criminal cases only because I had refused to obey his illegal orders and join hands with him in his corrupt practices,” Ghadge said in the affidavit.

    The FIR was based on a complaint filed by Ghadge, who is posted at Akola in Maharashtra.

    In his complaint, Ghadge had made a series of allegations of corruption againstSinghand other officers, in the period whenSinghwas posted with the Thane police.

    The Akola police had registered a Zero FIR (mode of lodging FIR in any police station irrespective of the offence committed in that area or any other area) and it was later transferred to the Thane police for investigation.

    Ghadge, who was posted in the Thane Police Commissionerate during 2015-2018, had alleged that Singh pressured him to drop the names of some persons from a case and when he refused to do so,Singhembroiled him in false cases.

    The case has been lodged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code for criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence and sections of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.