News Analysis India

Tag: All India Muslim Personal Law Board

  • All India Muslim Personal Law Board Reacts To ASI Report On Gyanvapi; Says No… |

    LUCKNOW: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has refuted claims that the report of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which conducted a scientific survey of the contentious Gyanvapi mosque premises in Varanasi and submitted the survey report in the district court earlier, found evidence of a Hindu temple there. In a press statement, AIMPLB executive member Qasim Rasool Ilyas said that the report of the ASI is not “conclusive evidence” in this controversial case.

    “By doing this the opposition party has created a feeling of anarchy and insecurity in the society,” he added. Ilyas also accused the Hindu side of ‘insulting’ the court by releasing the ASI report in the media. “Hindu communal organizations have been misleading the public for many years regarding the Gyanvapi Masjid. The latest example of this is a report of the Archaeological Survey of India which they filed in the court and made available to the plaintiff and defendant only on the orders of the court. This report was for their study and preparation but by publishing it in the press, the opposition party has not only insulted the court but has also tried to mislead the simple people of the country,” he said.

    He also alleged that the Hindu side had tried its best to mislead the public and create unrest in the society months before when the survey team in its report had described the fountain present in the reservoir as Shivalinga. “A few months ago, when the survey team in its report had described the fountain present in the reservoir as Shivalinga, the opposition party had tried its best to mislead the public and create unrest in the society by publicizing it, even though experts It could not be investigated nor did the court give any decision on it,” he said.

    The AIMPLB, a leading organisation of Muslims in the country, is a non-government body constituted in 1973 to adopt suitable strategies for the protection and continued applicability of Muslim Personal Law in India, most importantly the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937. The Muslim side’s response came a day after the Hindu plaintiffs’ lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain claimed citing the ASI report that there was evidence to prove that the Gyanvapi mosque had been built after demolishing a Hindu temple in the 17th century.

    Jain claimed that ASI’s 800-page long report mention finding ancient scriptures in Kannada, Devanagari, and Telugu languages inside the mosque premises. The scriptures were about Rudra, Janardan and Vishweshwar, and that the pillars of the demolished temple were used to build the mosque. The Varanasi court had on Wednesday directed for handing over the hard certified copies of the ASI report to the lawyers of the rival sides. Both Hindu and Muslim parties had sought copies of the ASI survey report.

    ASI had submitted the report in two sealed covers last month in court. ASI, during the survey, started on August 4, used ground-penetrating radar and other scientific instruments to ascertain what lay beneath the surface of the Gyanvapi mosque premises. The team also surveyed the inner and outer walls, the cellar and other parts of the premises barring the ‘wuzukhana’ (the place where Muslims perform ablution before proceeding to offer prayers).

    The ASI report on the Gyanvapi mosque complex revealed that a pre-existing structure appeared to have been destroyed in the 17th century, and “part of it was modified and reused,” adding that based on scientific studies, it can be said that there “existed a large Hindu temple prior to the construction of the existing structure.”

    The ASI also said the “western wall of the existing structure is the remaining part of a pre-existing Hindu temple”. “The Arabic-Persian inscription found inside a room mentions that the mosque was built in the 20th regnal year of Aurangzeb (1676-77 CE). Hence, the pre-existing structure appears to have been destroyed in the 17th century, during the reign of Aurangzeb, and part of it was modified and reused in the existing structure. Based on scientific studies/survey carried out, study of architectural remains, exposed features and artefacts, inscriptions, art and sculptures, it can be said that there existed a Hindu temple prior to the construction of the existing structure,” the ASI said in its report.

    “Based on the scientific studies and observations on central chamber and main entrance of the pre-existing structure in existing structure, western chamber and western wall, reuse of pillars and pilasters of pre-existing structure in the existing structure, inscriptions on the existing structure, Arabic and Persian inscription on the loose stone, sculptural remains in cellars, etc. it can be said that there existed a large Hindu temple, prior to the construction of the existing structure,” the report further said.

    “In compliance of the order of the District Court, Varanasi, dated July 21, 2023, affirmed by the High Court of Allahabad by order dated August 3, 2023, and the Supreme Court of India by order dated August 4, 2023, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) carried out a scientific investigation and survey in a 2150.5-square-meter area fenced with steel grills in and around the existing structure (excluding the areas sealed by the orders of the Supreme Court). All the objects which were noticed during the scientific investigation or survey in the complex were duly documented. These objects include inscriptions, sculptures, coins, architectural fragments, pottery, and objects of terracotta, stone, metal, and glass,” the report said.

    The ASI further noted that during the present survey, a total of 34 inscriptions were recorded and 32 stampages were taken. The ASI in its survey mentioned that pillars from earlier temples were reused while making cellars in the eastern part of the platform. “A series of cellars were also constructed to the east to create additional space and a large platform in front of the mosque for accommodating a large number of people for prayers. Pillars from earlier temples were reused while making cellars in the eastern part of the platform. A pillar decorated with bells, niches for keeping lamps on all four sides, and bearing an inscription of Samvat 1669 is reused in cellar N2,” it said.

    “Sculptures of Hindu deities and carved architectural members were found buried under the dumped soil in cellar S2,” it added. The survey of the Gyanvapi mosque premises began after the Allahabad High Court rejected the petition filed by Muslim litigants seeking a stay on the Varanasi court’s order for a scientific survey by the ASI. 

  • Babri Masjid demolition case: AIMPLB to move SC against CBI court acquittal of 32 accused

    By PTI

    AYODHYA: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) will move the Supreme Court against a CBI special court acquittal of all the 32 accused in the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition case, an official of the board said on Wednesday.

    The CBI court had on September 30, 2020 acquitted the accused including former deputy prime minister L K Advani in the case after which two Ayodhya residents — Haji Mahboob and Syed Akhlaq — moved a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court.

    A two-judge bench of the High Court rejected the revision petition on November 9 this year, saying the appellants had no locus to challenge the judgment as they were not victims of the case.

    AIMPLB executive member and spokesperson Syed Qasil Rasool Ilyas said the board has now decided to move the Supreme Court against the acquittal.

    “We are certainly going to approach the Supreme Court as the apex court in the Ayodhya Verdict itself has accepted that the demolition of Babri Masjid was a criminal act,” he told PTI.

    “The five-judge Supreme Court bench that delivered the historic Ayodhya verdict had termed the Babri Masjid destruction a serious violation of the rule of law and the accused are still out of the reach of Law,” he added.

    He said appellants Haji Mahboob and Syed Akhlaq were CBI witnesses and their houses were attacked and burnt on December 6, 1992 by a mob that was gathered by the accused.

    He said Mahboob and Akhlaq lived in the close vicinity of Babri Masjid.

    Mahboob and Akhlaq had moved the High Court on January 8, 2021 against the CBI Court judgement.

    While rejecting the petition, the High Court said in its order, “In view of the foregoing discussion, this Court is of the opinion that the instant criminal appeal filed on behalf of the appellants under Section 372 Cr.P.C., under the facts and circumstances of the case, is liable to be dismissed on the ground of non-availability of the locus of the appellants to challenge the impugned judgment and order dated September, 30, 2020 passed by the trial Court, hence the same is, accordingly, dismissed.”

    AYODHYA: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) will move the Supreme Court against a CBI special court acquittal of all the 32 accused in the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition case, an official of the board said on Wednesday.

    The CBI court had on September 30, 2020 acquitted the accused including former deputy prime minister L K Advani in the case after which two Ayodhya residents — Haji Mahboob and Syed Akhlaq — moved a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court.

    A two-judge bench of the High Court rejected the revision petition on November 9 this year, saying the appellants had no locus to challenge the judgment as they were not victims of the case.

    AIMPLB executive member and spokesperson Syed Qasil Rasool Ilyas said the board has now decided to move the Supreme Court against the acquittal.

    “We are certainly going to approach the Supreme Court as the apex court in the Ayodhya Verdict itself has accepted that the demolition of Babri Masjid was a criminal act,” he told PTI.

    “The five-judge Supreme Court bench that delivered the historic Ayodhya verdict had termed the Babri Masjid destruction a serious violation of the rule of law and the accused are still out of the reach of Law,” he added.

    He said appellants Haji Mahboob and Syed Akhlaq were CBI witnesses and their houses were attacked and burnt on December 6, 1992 by a mob that was gathered by the accused.

    He said Mahboob and Akhlaq lived in the close vicinity of Babri Masjid.

    Mahboob and Akhlaq had moved the High Court on January 8, 2021 against the CBI Court judgement.

    While rejecting the petition, the High Court said in its order, “In view of the foregoing discussion, this Court is of the opinion that the instant criminal appeal filed on behalf of the appellants under Section 372 Cr.P.C., under the facts and circumstances of the case, is liable to be dismissed on the ground of non-availability of the locus of the appellants to challenge the impugned judgment and order dated September, 30, 2020 passed by the trial Court, hence the same is, accordingly, dismissed.”

  • AIMPLB alleges bias against madrassas in BJP-ruled states

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has expressed concern over the alleged targeting of madrassas by the BJP-led central and state governments and asked why same rules do not apply for other religious institutions such as mutts, gurukuls and dharmshalas.

    In a statement, AIMPLB general secretary Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani alleged that the governments of a party, which is influenced by the RSS, at the Centre and in some states were having a negative approach towards minorities, especially the Muslim community.

    “When a party influenced by a certain thought comes to power, it is expected that its approach will be unbiased and within the frame of our Constitution,” he said.

    Rahmani said Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself has spoken in parliament and other places about the importance of law and order but various state governments where the BJP is in power, their attitude is the opposite.

    “The way in which BJP governments in Assam and UP have been after the madrassas over very small violations and are targeting the madrassas by closing, bulldozing them and even harassing people working in the madrasas and masjids by alleging that they were terrorists without any reason,” he said, according to a statement issued on Thursday.

    Also, prominent people coming from outside the country have to face bans and restrictions, which is a gross violation of the Constitution, he said.

    “If bulldozing buildings is the only option for any violation then why don’t they take a similar approach for gurukuls, mutts and dharmshalas as they do in the case of madrassas and mosques,” Rahmani asked.

    It seems that the government is doing things at its own will and not following what is written in the Constitution, he alleged.

    The Muslim Personal Law Board condemns such a biased approach and requests governments to follow what is written in the Constitution and practise it with patience, he added.

    The statement came after the Uttar Pradesh government on Wednesday announced a survey of unrecognised madrassas in the state to gather information about the number of teachers, curriculum, and basic facilities available there, among others.

    Meanwhile, the Assam government’s ongoing drive to demolish madrassas for their connection to alleged “‘jihadi activities” has drawn sharp criticism from the Opposition, which has termed the exercise as “totally illegal” and targeted at “one partcular community”.

    Three madrassas have been demolished by the BJP government within the last one month in different parts of the state after arresting their teachers, who were found to be allegedly involved in “jihadi” activities.

    However, on each occasion the official reason for bringing down the structures are related to faulty construction or violation of land norms instead of any link with jihadi activities.

    It is only the political leaders from the ruling dispensation who usually give statements in the media that the madrassas have been demolished for allegedly carrying out jihadi activities from their premises.

    The administration bulldozed madrassas at Moirabari in Morigaon district on August 4, at Dhakaliapara in Barpeta on August 29 and at Jogighopa in Bongaigaon on August 31.

    “The Moirabari madrassa was demolished after a notice was sent to it saying that the building was small and the electricity connection was illegal. The one at Dhakaliapara one was demolished as it was on government land,” All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya secretary Abdul Kadir told PTI.

    The two-storeyed residential madrassa at Jogighopa was razed to the ground for violating disaster norms and the authorities asked the boarders to vacate the premises at 10 pm the previous night, he claimed.

    “We have been cooperating with the law enforcing agencies if someone is found doing something wrong. But that does not mean that the entire institution is at fault. What is the point in demolishing an educational centre?” asked Kadir.

    From April 1 last year, 610 state-run madrassas in Assam were converted into upper primary, high and higher secondary schools with no change of status, pay, allowances and service conditions for the teaching and non-teaching staff.

    Following it, the State Madrassa Education Board, Assam was dissolved and the last Assam High Madrassa examination by the Board of Secondary Education, Assam (SEBA) for Class 10 students took place in 2022.

    At present, there are about 1,000 private madrassas, which are run according to the guidelines and syllabus of the All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya (AATMQ).

    AATMQ offers general courses till class eight and theology thereafter.

    From this year those wishing to study general courses for classes 9 and 10 in madrassas will be able to appear for the exams under an open schooling system with its support.

    Meanwhile, a senior official of the SEBA said that about 10 private madrassas have approached it for converting those into general schools, which was done after following the due process.

    Opposition senior Congress leader Rakibul Hussain hit out at the Himanta Biswa Sarma government for the demolitions, “It is unconstitutional to destroy the madrassas.

    The chief minister said that the suspected jihadis entered Assam or started their activities within the last three year. If so, then only the BJP has to be blamed as they are in power since 2016.”

    He also alleged that Sarma is making contradictory statements as he had praised the madrassas as centres of spiritualism during his days in the Congress, but is now blaming them for anti-social activities.

    Opposition All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) said that the Assam government is “totally wrong” in bulldozing the educational centres on the pretext of curbing jihadi activities.

    “If there were something wrong, then rectify those. After all these madrassas are imparting education. Demolishing the madrassas is an expression of hatred against one particular community,” AIUDF MLA Ashraful Hussain said.

    He also said that Assam state Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, headed by AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal, and AATMQ are considering approaching the court against the demolition of the madrassas.

    CPI(M) state secretary Suprakash Talukdar said the party is totally against the demolition of madrassas as arresting a suspect is not the final step of the justice delivery system.

    “The government is breaking all laws. Who is responsible for demolishing a centre of education? Who will pay for its costs? These are usually constructed with public donations,” he said.

    “The government has become more intolerant. We have also seen a lot of cases against the alleged jihadi elements. But what is the fate of those cases? Were those accused convicted?” he asked.

    More than 40 people with suspected links to jihadi elements, including Bangladeshi nationals, have been arrested in the state since March this year.

    NEW DELHI: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has expressed concern over the alleged targeting of madrassas by the BJP-led central and state governments and asked why same rules do not apply for other religious institutions such as mutts, gurukuls and dharmshalas.

    In a statement, AIMPLB general secretary Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani alleged that the governments of a party, which is influenced by the RSS, at the Centre and in some states were having a negative approach towards minorities, especially the Muslim community.

    “When a party influenced by a certain thought comes to power, it is expected that its approach will be unbiased and within the frame of our Constitution,” he said.

    Rahmani said Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself has spoken in parliament and other places about the importance of law and order but various state governments where the BJP is in power, their attitude is the opposite.

    “The way in which BJP governments in Assam and UP have been after the madrassas over very small violations and are targeting the madrassas by closing, bulldozing them and even harassing people working in the madrasas and masjids by alleging that they were terrorists without any reason,” he said, according to a statement issued on Thursday.

    Also, prominent people coming from outside the country have to face bans and restrictions, which is a gross violation of the Constitution, he said.

    “If bulldozing buildings is the only option for any violation then why don’t they take a similar approach for gurukuls, mutts and dharmshalas as they do in the case of madrassas and mosques,” Rahmani asked.

    It seems that the government is doing things at its own will and not following what is written in the Constitution, he alleged.

    The Muslim Personal Law Board condemns such a biased approach and requests governments to follow what is written in the Constitution and practise it with patience, he added.

    The statement came after the Uttar Pradesh government on Wednesday announced a survey of unrecognised madrassas in the state to gather information about the number of teachers, curriculum, and basic facilities available there, among others.

    Meanwhile, the Assam government’s ongoing drive to demolish madrassas for their connection to alleged “‘jihadi activities” has drawn sharp criticism from the Opposition, which has termed the exercise as “totally illegal” and targeted at “one partcular community”.

    Three madrassas have been demolished by the BJP government within the last one month in different parts of the state after arresting their teachers, who were found to be allegedly involved in “jihadi” activities.

    However, on each occasion the official reason for bringing down the structures are related to faulty construction or violation of land norms instead of any link with jihadi activities.

    It is only the political leaders from the ruling dispensation who usually give statements in the media that the madrassas have been demolished for allegedly carrying out jihadi activities from their premises.

    The administration bulldozed madrassas at Moirabari in Morigaon district on August 4, at Dhakaliapara in Barpeta on August 29 and at Jogighopa in Bongaigaon on August 31.

    “The Moirabari madrassa was demolished after a notice was sent to it saying that the building was small and the electricity connection was illegal. The one at Dhakaliapara one was demolished as it was on government land,” All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya secretary Abdul Kadir told PTI.

    The two-storeyed residential madrassa at Jogighopa was razed to the ground for violating disaster norms and the authorities asked the boarders to vacate the premises at 10 pm the previous night, he claimed.

    “We have been cooperating with the law enforcing agencies if someone is found doing something wrong. But that does not mean that the entire institution is at fault. What is the point in demolishing an educational centre?” asked Kadir.

    From April 1 last year, 610 state-run madrassas in Assam were converted into upper primary, high and higher secondary schools with no change of status, pay, allowances and service conditions for the teaching and non-teaching staff.

    Following it, the State Madrassa Education Board, Assam was dissolved and the last Assam High Madrassa examination by the Board of Secondary Education, Assam (SEBA) for Class 10 students took place in 2022.

    At present, there are about 1,000 private madrassas, which are run according to the guidelines and syllabus of the All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya (AATMQ).

    AATMQ offers general courses till class eight and theology thereafter.

    From this year those wishing to study general courses for classes 9 and 10 in madrassas will be able to appear for the exams under an open schooling system with its support.

    Meanwhile, a senior official of the SEBA said that about 10 private madrassas have approached it for converting those into general schools, which was done after following the due process.

    Opposition senior Congress leader Rakibul Hussain hit out at the Himanta Biswa Sarma government for the demolitions, “It is unconstitutional to destroy the madrassas.

    The chief minister said that the suspected jihadis entered Assam or started their activities within the last three year. If so, then only the BJP has to be blamed as they are in power since 2016.”

    He also alleged that Sarma is making contradictory statements as he had praised the madrassas as centres of spiritualism during his days in the Congress, but is now blaming them for anti-social activities.

    Opposition All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) said that the Assam government is “totally wrong” in bulldozing the educational centres on the pretext of curbing jihadi activities.

    “If there were something wrong, then rectify those. After all these madrassas are imparting education. Demolishing the madrassas is an expression of hatred against one particular community,” AIUDF MLA Ashraful Hussain said.

    He also said that Assam state Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, headed by AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal, and AATMQ are considering approaching the court against the demolition of the madrassas.

    CPI(M) state secretary Suprakash Talukdar said the party is totally against the demolition of madrassas as arresting a suspect is not the final step of the justice delivery system.

    “The government is breaking all laws. Who is responsible for demolishing a centre of education? Who will pay for its costs? These are usually constructed with public donations,” he said.

    “The government has become more intolerant. We have also seen a lot of cases against the alleged jihadi elements. But what is the fate of those cases? Were those accused convicted?” he asked.

    More than 40 people with suspected links to jihadi elements, including Bangladeshi nationals, have been arrested in the state since March this year.

  • Prophet remark fallout: Don’t go to TV debates, Muslim personal law board tells Islamic scholars

    By Online Desk

    The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Friday appealed to Muslim scholars and Ulemas (Maulvis) not to participate in TV channel debates.

    “By participating in programs, they are not able to do any service to Islam and Muslims, but indirectly insult and ridicule Islam and Muslims,” the Muslim body said in an advisory.

    The @AIMPLB_Official has appealed to Islamic Scholars/Ulemas and Muslim Intellectuals not to participate in TV Channel debates. pic.twitter.com/ASgjUuDUG3
    — Muslim Spaces (@MuslimSpaces) June 10, 2022
    AIMPLB said that the Muslim Scholars and Ulemas should boycott those channels whose only objective is to ridicule Islam and Muslims. “If we boycott their programmes, not only their TRPs will fall but they will also miserably fail in their objectives,” AIMPLB said.

    The Muslim body added that participation in the TV debates does not serve Islam and Muslims. Rather, it indirectly insults and ridicules the sect.

    “The purpose of these programme is never to reach a conclusion through constructive debate. They invite a Muslim scholar only to prove their ‘fairness’ and our scholars and ulemas fall prey to their conspiracies,” the board said.

  • Uniform Civil Code not suitable for multi-religious country like India: AIMPLB

    The Muslim board said the UCC was antithetical to the fundamental right to practice religion as enshrined in the Constitution.

  • Muslim body launches campaign to prevent dowry, asks clerics to not solemnise such weddings

    Express News Service
    NEW DELHI: Nearly a month after a 23-year-old woman died by suicide allegedly due to dowry harassment, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has directed clerics to not solemnise weddings where such demands are made by the groom’s family. The campaign has already started in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Telangana, Madhya Pradesh, and Karnataka and will soon be launched in all other states and Union Territories too, the prominent Muslim body said.

    “It has been decided where there is a forced dealing of dowry in marriage, Ulama and Qazis would not participate in that marriage. This initiative is necessary for the protection of the daughters,” the AIMPLB said.

    The Social Reform Committee of AIMPLB has launched a campaign to make Marriages simple, easy & prevent unnecessary ceremonies & customs, especially Demands of dowry & oppression on daughters & daughter in laws. @MaulanaUmrain, d Secretary of the Board, is heading d campaign.(1/3)
    — All India Muslim Personal Law Board (@AIMPLB_Official) March 21, 2021

    The Muslim body also called upon the community to make marriages simple, convenient and easy. “Muslims should not hold marriage ceremonies in big hotels and expensive wedding halls. In the same way, avoid the customary dowry, barat and other rituals and save yourself and others. Treat your wives well, and achieve success and prosperity by adopting Islamic teachings,” said Maulana Muhammad Rabe Hasani Nadvi, President of AIMPLB.

    Secretary of the Board Maulana Umrain Mahfuz Rahmani said that the campaign is aimed at urging the community to make marriages simple, easy and prevent unnecessary ceremonies and customs, especially demands of dowry that lead to oppression of daughters and daughters-in-law. “This campaign has been started in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Telangana, Madhya Pradesh, and Karnataka by holding meetings with scholars and social workers of these states. The campaign will start in other states too in a few days, insha’Allah,” the Muslim body stated.

    The development comes days after a woman from Ahmedabad died by suicide due to drowning in Sabarmati river. Before jumping into the river, the woman made a video in which she asked her father to drop the case of domestic violence against her husband and in-laws. It was later revealed that her husband and in-laws used to abuse her physically for dowry. The video caused a lot of stir in the society and her husband was later arrested.

  • Editorial: Conspiracy to construct the Islamic Republic of India by Congress now for securing power by secession-ism and fundamentalism

    Rahul Gandhi was born in Christian family in Italy. There is Vatican City right there. This is the reason that Rahul Gandhi is with the hand of Christian missionaries. At the time of the Gujarat assembly election, the Christian cleric had given a fatwa that the Nationalist Party BJP should not be voted. Similarly, during the Karnataka assembly elections, the Christian Archbishop had issued a fatwa that the BJP should not be voted.

    Similarly, the fundamentalists and separatists are also in the hands of the Congress. The Congress is a supporter of the Hurriyat. With the help of Pakistan, he is looking at the power of unleashing India and trying to grab power.

    Under the conspiracy, today Congress has supported the conspiracy the establishment of the Shariat Courts to set up separate courts for Muslims, and the fundamentalist Muslim Personal Law Board has supported the Congress.

    Actress Koina Mitra has given the people who advocate Sharia law!

    The All India Muslim Personal Law Board is now planning to open Darul-kaja-ie Shariat court in all the districts of the country to resolve issues according to Islamic laws. This proposal will be presented in the meeting of the Muslim Personal Law Board in Delhi on July 15 for discussion. The Law Board is considered to be the largest organization of Muslims in the country.

    On the other hand, against the ruling of the Muslim Law Board from BJP to SP, they are standing against this decision. BJP spokesperson Meenakshi Lekhi also blamed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board on this matter. “You can discuss religious matters, but the judiciary is important in this country. Sharia courts have no place in the villages and districts of the country. The courts of the country work under the law. Our country is not the Islamic Republic of India. ”

    This is the case – it is significant that the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) had said that it would consider increasing lawyers to introduce lawyers, judges and common people to Shariah law.

    Since Rahul Gandhi has been the President of the Congress since then, he has been forming the form of openly polynomial Brahmin and dividing Hindus and becoming the biggest supporter of radicalism and separatism. Following the policy of divide and rule like the British, they have dreamed of becoming the Yen-Ken-Rukt Prime Minister.

    We hope that they will definitely dream of becoming Prime Minister, but do not try to dissolve the unity of India.