Lakshika Sahu, Raipur. Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma said in the report released by the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council on the minority population that the minority community is flourishing only because of the tolerance of Hindus, we are also happy about it. But if the number of Hindus decreases, this is also a matter of concern, because decreasing the number of Hindus will bring anarchy in the country. Read this also: The government enumerated the benefits of converting Swami Atmanand School into ‘PMShri’…
Deputy Chief Minister and Home Minister of Chhattisgarh Vijay Sharma said on the changes in the demography of the country and the state that the change in demography is a big threat to the unity of India. He said that generally such increase in population does not happen, hence it is very important to consider the number of infiltrators there. It has to be clarified in which areas this is happening?
The Deputy Chief Minister said that change in demography is a big danger for any place. The tolerance of Hindus has been established in front of the whole world since ancient times. Due to the tolerance of Hindus, the entire minority community is flourishing here and we are happy about it, but it is also a matter of concern if the number of Hindus decreases. Reduction in the number of Hindus will bring anarchy in the country.
Read this also: America rejected Russian claims of interference in Indian elections, said this…
Vijay Sharma said that the proportion in which the number of Hindus is said to have decreased by 7.8 percent, then it is worth considering how many crores this number will be and the population that has increased has increased by almost 50 percent. So what a big deal this is! Normally the population cannot increase this much. Everyone has to understand the seriousness of this issue, otherwise India has already suffered the brunt of such partition. This change in demography is a big threat to India.
The Deputy Chief Minister said that in any normal process the population cannot increase so quickly. There are many things that are responsible for this. Therefore, it is meaningless to say why this is being said at the time of elections? Why should we not speak on this topic during elections? Whatever may be the topic, whether to speak or not to speak at the time of elections, it does not happen like this. Whatever is necessary should be said and there is no doubt about it.