Reports indicate that Pakistan’s military establishment is reportedly planning a significant crackdown on former Prime Minister Imran Khan due to his persistent defiance. Despite multiple attempts at negotiation and offers of safe passage abroad, Khan has refused to concede, leading to growing frustration within the army. The military is increasingly concerned by Khan’s substantial public support and is exploring options, including potentially banning his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), or even initiating treason charges.
The army is attempting to portray Khan as a national security risk, suggesting his past knowledge of sensitive state assets could be misused. Claims of mental instability are also being floated to undermine his credibility regarding national secrets. This strategic messaging aims to justify potential punitive actions against the former premier.
Furthermore, the military is reportedly attributing the resurgence of the Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) and strained relations with the Afghan Taliban, which have led to significant losses, to policies enacted during Khan’s tenure. The army claims that his government facilitated the return and settlement of TTP militants, contributing to a nearly 500% surge in terror attacks.
While the establishment views Khan as an intractable figure, analysts caution that drastic measures like treason trials or party bans could provoke widespread public unrest. Khan’s legacy as a World Cup-winning cricketer and his popular appeal present a significant challenge to the army’s plans. Any move against him risks igniting large-scale public demonstrations that could prove difficult to control.
Despite internal disagreements, the establishment appears determined to proceed against Khan, citing increased international pressure and historical grievances, including Khan’s accusations of US involvement in his ouster and perceived damage to ties with China over the CPEC project. A case is reportedly being built against him, focusing on his alleged role in reviving the TTP, mismanagement of foreign policy, and concerns about his mental state and potential to leak state secrets.