In a significant escalation of tensions between the West Bengal government and central probe agencies, the Enforcement Directorate approached the Calcutta High Court, leveling serious charges against Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee for allegedly sabotaging the I-PAC raid investigation. The ED’s urgent plea highlights how the CM’s interventions have jeopardized a crucial money laundering inquiry.
Background to the case traces back to surprise ED operations targeting I-PAC offices and linked premises, uncovering a web of financial irregularities. The firm, known for its data-driven campaign management that propelled TMC to victories, is now under scanner for receiving unaccounted funds exceeding Rs 50 crore during the 2021 assembly elections.
ED submissions to the court detail specific instances where Banerjee’s public outbursts, including calls to ‘resist central overreach,’ have demoralized their teams and scared off informants. ‘Such overt political meddling undermines the rule of law,’ asserted the agency’s lawyer, seeking contempt proceedings and gag orders.
Responding swiftly, Mamata Banerjee addressed a mammoth rally, framing the ED action as ‘Modi government’s weaponization of institutions.’ TMC has mobilized its legal machinery, preparing to file caveats and counter-affidavits. The episode has reignited debates on cooperative federalism, with Bengal’s ruling party accusing Delhi of selective targeting.
Observers note this isn’t isolated; similar accusations flew during previous probes into coal scam and cattle trade rackets. With the court poised to intervene, stakeholders await clarity on whether political rhetoric crosses into obstruction territory. The coming days could redefine boundaries between criticism and interference in India’s complex law enforcement landscape.
