Tensions flared in Indian politics as Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, the fiery former BJP parliamentarian from Bhopal, launched a pointed attack on Rahul Gandhi’s credentials. Citing Chanakya’s teachings, she boldly stated that no son of a foreign-born mother can claim true nationalism or leadership suitability for the nation.
During an interview, Thakur elaborated on her stance: ‘Chanakya, the great strategist of our heritage, made it clear—and it’s undeniable—that such a lineage disqualifies one from patriotism and governance.’ The comment, laced with historical reference, was a thinly veiled swipe at Gandhi, whose mother Sonia hails from Italy.
Samajwadi Party spokesperson Fakhrul Hasan Chand responded with disdain, rejecting the notion of patriotism being certified by Thakur. ‘Does anyone require her stamp of approval? Her camp doesn’t get to define patriotism for India. Our people need no such validation from these quarters,’ he retorted sharply.
Turning to substantive matters, Chand highlighted the real crises plaguing the country. He called out unemployment ravaging the youth, skyrocketing inflation, and vulnerabilities in women’s protection. ‘Forget temple-mosque squabbles; they don’t shape our future. Parties must tackle jobs, price hikes, and safety. True advancement comes when youth have work, costs drop, and families feel secure,’ he argued.
The exchange highlights a familiar pattern in polarized discourse, where personal barbs often eclipse urgent reforms. With elections looming, such controversies may energize bases but risk alienating moderate voters seeking solutions over slurs.
