Virendra Gahwai, Bilaspur. In a divorce case, the High Court’s division bench has said that if the wife’s behavior is not good even after the husband separates her from her parents, then it is mental cruelty. The court has accepted the divorce application and rejected the order of the family court and considered the husband entitled to divorce. The case was heard in the bench of High Court Justice Gautam Bhaduri and Justice Sanjay S Agarwal. Also read: Anwar Dhebar’s trouble increased, the court accepted the production warrant of UP Police, left for Meerut…
Let us tell you that a young man living in Kabirdham got married to a girl from there in February 2002. After marriage, they had two daughters. The husband alleges that his wife used to quarrel over small things and misbehave with the elderly parents, and also used to get angry and misbehave with the husband to get her way. After a few years, she started pressuring the husband to live separately from the in-laws.
Also read: Shameful…, MPs observed silence in Canadian Parliament in memory of Khalistani terrorist Nijjar…
After the social meeting, he started living with his wife and daughters at another place from December 2013, but even after living separately, his wife’s behavior did not change. Troubled by his wife’s behavior, the husband filed a complaint for divorce in the family court. In which it was said that he has been living separately with his wife and children since December 2013. The wife even filed a false case in the police station against his parents and brother who are government employees. Now his wife is living separately with her daughters, and is not even allowing him to meet them.
Also read: Assam Home Secretary shot himself, know why he took this suicidal step…
Without hearing the arguments of the husband, the family court dismissed the complaint on 15 February 2016 due to the absence of the wife. Then the husband challenged the order of the family court and appealed in the High Court. In which he said that he has been living separately from his wife for 10 years. He is entitled to divorce under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955. After hearing all the parties, the court has cancelled the order of the family court and considered the husband entitled to divorce.
Click here to read news from ChhattisgarhClick here to read news from Madhya PradeshClick here to read news from Uttar PradeshClick here to read news from DelhiClick here to read news from PunjabClick here to read news in EnglishClick here to read sports newsClick here to read entertainment news