|
| |
Tags:
Newsanalysis Anti Hindu Redical Shilpa Grey Star Coin Rs two
Jeruslaem cross Soft nation ‘Western Indian culture Secular
media journalist Marriage bureau Parrelel court Fatwa Whip HIV
AIDS Guddy Big B Brother UNICEF Condom Sexual abuse Hollywood
USA Nithari Renuka;
|
|
If
so called seculars call -Hindu Radical- then why can others
not call -Anti-Hindu Radical? Have they liberty of expression
and others slaves? Violent attack on the Star office has no
excuse. It should never be happened. But we should not be
blind to see other side of coin.
One may be with the coin of Rs two with the mark of Jerusalem
Cross. Is this reason to be blind?
After Terrorism now India is soft nation for sex in public. Why is
the import of Valentine day and other Western culture here?
Sixteen year girl of Surat with a youth of another religion took
shelter in the Star news office Mumbai and mob attacked. In another
corner there was sexy kiss hug in public to stop AIDS. Great
journalists bigger than Pulitzer teach tolerance to us. Where were
these tolerant when my web blog was hacked by Christian radical
and posted insulted matter in that? This is not the first
instance. List is very long. I leave it for future.
|
|
I
have just come to know TOI reported on April 17:
JAIPUR/GHAZIABAD:
Two complaints have been filed in separate courts in Rajasthan and
Uttar Pradesh today against actress Shilpa Shetty and Hollywood
star Richard Gere accusing them of indulging in an "obscene act"
during an AIDS awareness programme
Any type of violence should be condemned. In the same way evoking
the sentiments of people through print or electronic media should
also be condemned. It is good that Home Minister became immediate
attentive on the incident and needed immediate Acton on the
attackers. It would be better if he showed his unwillingness on
the minor girl company with a youth of another religion against the
wishes of her parents in the office of the channel. Was there any
conspiracy to evoke the sentiments of both religious communities?
Why name of Surat came in this? Why did they select Mumbai a safe
place which is in the target of terrorists?
So
called secular media should not behave like Al-Qaeda and Taliban
Are electronic channels marriage bureau? Is giving a minor girl
with boy of another religion for marriage purpose not offense?
State home Minister Jaiswal do not say a single word on this. Is
marriage of minor allowed legally?
When more than 17 of Hindu org and few American websites were
blocked then what did so called secular journalists? The reasoning
was given that ‘not doing so, for blocking further train blasting
in Mumbai. Why did government spread hate like this madly argument
against Hindus. Being a Hindu may be sin for so called renowned
dynasty but not for all Hindus. They can’t be made fool all the
time. Tears on attack at star channel is good. Attack should be
condemned. But what they have to say of website blocking? Why
freedom of fake secular media is partial? Are they Mahatma Gandhi
to be impartial between Nehru and Subhash Chandra Bose?
Why are channels tried to run parallel court as naxalites run?
Why does media not comment on the whip-fatwa of the political
parties in parliament? Is this freedom of expression?
Are there not rules and regulations in media by their employers?
Why rules adopted by Sindhi samaj are fatwas?
Why a section of media insults Sindhi samaj? If journalists have
guide lines (fatwa) of their employers then why do they object on
Sindhi samaj? Why do they beat others by their fake secular
journalistic stick?
Hanging ‘kanth langot’ does not mean every one becomes
intellectual. Leaders want publicity. So few of them may be as
wetted cat. Journalists want employment for handsome money. For
many journalism is a noble profession. Money is not all for them.
Media should not be in the hands of some families only.
Anti-Indian foreign elements funding few section of media. There
was a time when journalist opposed this and yellow journalism.
Public is not on sale. Still there are renowned journalists and
media who are doing with their best for the unity of India and for
the sake of Indianess.
I recall an incident. I was publishing a Hindi Weekly in my young
age. In my absence my sub editor published news titled “Rajatalab
banam daloli (Rajatalab ward allies red light area’. Whole
residents of the ward wanted to attack my office. So at the time
of publishing or scanning news, every one should be careful. That
sub editor is now a renowned saint of Chhattisgarh.
The actors Shilpa and Grey were in Delhi on April 15 to urge
Indian truckers, the most vulnerable section of society, to keep
off the dreaded HIV/AIDS. Big Brother return Shilpa shetty now has
become a great preacher as Mahatma Gandhi to teach India. Hear
the great actress preacher: “If protecting Indian culture and
tradition means burning our effigies please go ahead and carry on
with your protests. But, our culture also teaches us to imbibe 'Atithi
Devo Bhava' (the guest is god).”
Why did Shilpa being a guest actor, dishonor Guddy in Big Brother
on racism? Why Guddy was not God for her at that time. Guddy said
some thing by tongue. Was that great crime then the Grey did with
her in the public? She has liberty to do any thing in four walls.
What is the definition of dignity and honor” But if any one have
no honor then what is the value for him/her for honor and dignity.
Honor of our womon should not be auctioned in public.
In her home she can do whatever she likes. No one dare to ask who
does what in her room. Under the garment every one is nude but it
does not mean we walk and talk in public in the same position. Any
one shows vulnerable in public then public have right to behave on
that in the same way. Shilpa should registered a case against her
female fellow Robertson’s who claimed that Fiennes, 44, not only
had unprotected sex with her on board the flight from Darwin to
Mumbai, but followed it up with a rendezvous are threatening to
overshadow Fiennes’s reputation as a respected and intellectual
actor.
The programme
titled Seena Taan Ke was organised to reach out to hundreds
The Program was aimed at highlighting the importance of safe sex
to the truckers.
It is argued that HIV doesn't spread by a kiss on the cheek. Then
it is also open fact that sex with condom keep safe from AIDS.
Then why was sex not happened before the truckers?
Don’t be anger
on me and read the following.
UNICEF
ambassador on HIV/AIDS did unprotected sex in sky and land both:
As reported at ‘Expressindia.com’:
The hot story that British tabloids are screaming about was set not just
several miles high in the sky but on the ground in Mumbai as well. Ralph
Fiennes, British film star and UNICEF ambassador who was on an HIV/AIDS
mission to India late last month, invited Lisa Robertson, a Quantas
stewardess to his hotel room in Mumbai as soon as she checked into
Mumbai’s Grand Hyatt, reported The Daily Mail
Robertson’s claims
that Fiennes, 44, not only had unprotected sex with her on board the
flight from Darwin to Mumbai, but followed it up with a rendezvous are
threatening to overshadow Fiennes’s reputation as a respected and
intellectual actor. The irony is, Fiennes was traveling to India to
raise HIV awareness and to help promote safe sex.
“No Condom, No
Sex”
As reported on Jan
11, Hollywood star Richard Gere cheered on thousands of Indian
prostitutes dancing to raunchy Bollywood songs and urged them to refuse
sex without condoms to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS. "No condom, no
sex. No condom, no sex. No condom, no sex," Gere hollered into a
microphone as about 10,000 prostitutes gathered at a dusty Mumbai
fairground joined him in chorus. This is good for 100% prostitutes.
First
recognized cases of AIDS occurred in the USA
The origin of AIDS
and HIV has puzzled scientists ever since the illness first came to
light in the early 1980s in America. For over twenty years it has been
the subject of fierce debate and the cause of countless arguments, with
everything from a promiscuous flight attendant to a suspect vaccine
program being blamed. So what is the truth? Just where did AIDS come
from?
Condoms in Class
VII school bags
As reported by TOI on
Dec 3, 2004: Andhra Pradesh Endowments Minister M Satyanarayana Rao
insists he's dead serious when he says condoms ought to be distributed
with textbooks to students of Class VII and above.
Do Shilapa learn
to preach from Renuka Chaudhary?
Renuka Chaudhary is
most fast in the cabinet of Manmohan Singh. She is in the good book of
Sonia Gandhi and waiting for promotion. Less than a week she got report
on Nithari serial killing from her appointed committee. UPA Government
in whole unable to collect the data on OBC but Renuka Chaudhary has
capacity to gather every kind of data.
A
study earlier this week revealed that two-thirds of children in India
are physically abused while more than half have faced some form of
sexual abuse.
The study -- which questioned almost 12,500 children and parents across
13 of India's 29 states -- found that half the cases of sexual abuse
were committed by persons known to the child or in a position of trust
and responsibility.
"I think the study is like heaving a sigh of relief because it's
something that parents knew but they wouldn't voice as the culture
doesn't permit this," Chowdhury, India's minister for women and child
development, said in an interview.
"Sex
education does not mean you are encouraging sex which is how it's
interpreted," she said. "Sex education is insurance for your child. It
will protect your child.
So
Children should take condom and do sex whenever whatever day and night
they like. Big B is safe in Nishabd and Prof Matuknath Chaudhary is safe
with her girl student. And politicians‘ money is safe in Swiss banks. Am
I wrong?
I
recall an incident. In past I was in Mumbai. There was a reputed college
near Juhu beach. Sweeper found there condoms in the bathrooms. Should
government gives economic aid according to the condom used in the
institutions? Think again and again to keep fingers in your head hairs
and tickle there.
By Premendra Agrawal
agrawalpremendra@hotmail.com |